StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Network Monitoring
  5. Packetbeat vs WireEdit

Packetbeat vs WireEdit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Packetbeat
Packetbeat
Stacks15
Followers44
Votes4
WireEdit
WireEdit
Stacks0
Followers6
Votes0

Packetbeat vs WireEdit: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Data Source**: Packetbeat captures network traffic data for monitoring and analyzing, while WireEdit is a network protocol editing tool.
2. **Packet Parsing Capability**: Packetbeat can parse network packets and extract useful information, such as HTTP requests, DNS queries, etc., whereas WireEdit allows users to view and edit network packets at lower levels, including manipulating individual bits and bytes.
3. **Real-time Monitoring**: Packetbeat provides real-time monitoring of network traffic, enabling immediate insight into packet flows and communication patterns, unlike WireEdit, which focuses more on protocol analysis and editing.
4. **Integration**: Packetbeat is often integrated with ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) for data visualization and analysis, whereas WireEdit is a standalone tool for protocol manipulation and editing.
5. **Ease of Use**: Packetbeat is designed for ease of use with pre-built protocols and dashboards for monitoring specific services, while WireEdit offers more advanced capabilities for network packet manipulation but may have a steeper learning curve for beginners.
6. **Focus**: Packetbeat is primarily focused on network monitoring and analysis for troubleshooting and performance optimization, while WireEdit is geared towards network protocol editing and customization for specific use cases.

In Summary, Packetbeat and WireEdit differ in their core functionalities, with Packetbeat focusing on network monitoring and analysis, while WireEdit specializes in network protocol editing and manipulation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Packetbeat
Packetbeat
WireEdit
WireEdit

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

WireEdit is a desktop WYSIWYG packet editor. It lets you easily edit captured network packets in a simple point-and-click interface.

Packetbeat Statistics: Contains high-level views like the network topology, the application layer protocols repartition, the response times repartition, and others;Packetbeat Search: This page enables you to do full text searches over the indexed network messages;Packetbeat Query Analysis: This page demonstrates more advanced statistics like the top N slow SQL queries, the database throughput or the most common MySQL erro
Edit any packet at any layer from L1 to L7 with just a few mouse clicks. No hacking required. No need to look at Hex dumps.;WireEdit knows all mandatory/optional elements of a packet, their data types, encoding, inter-dependency, position offsets, value constraints, checksums, etc.;As you're editing WireEdit takes care of all the behind-the-scene details on the fly. No need to think about any of it.
Statistics
Stacks
15
Stacks
0
Followers
44
Followers
6
Votes
4
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Works well with ELK stack
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Packetbeat, WireEdit?

Riemann

Riemann

Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.

Observium

Observium

It is a low-maintenance auto-discovering network monitoring platform supporting a wide range of device types, platforms and operating systems

Beats

Beats

Beats is the platform for single-purpose data shippers. They send data from hundreds or thousands of machines and systems to Logstash or Elasticsearch.

Wireshark

Wireshark

It is the world’s foremost and widely-used network protocol analyzer. It lets you see what’s happening on your network at a microscopic level and is the de facto standard across many commercial and non-profit enterprises, government agencies, and educational institutions.

PRTG

PRTG

It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.

LibreNMS

LibreNMS

It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.

Tailscale

Tailscale

It connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Create a secure network between your servers, computers, and cloud instances. Even when separated by firewalls or subnets, Tailscale just works. It makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Nagios XI

Nagios XI

It is the most powerful and trusted network monitoring software on the market. It extends on proven, enterprise-class Open Source components to deliver the best network, server and application monitoring solution for today's demanding organizational requirements.

Snort

Snort

It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.

Pi-hole

Pi-hole

It is a DNS sinkhole that protects your devices from unwanted content, without installing any client-side software. You can run it in a container, or deploy it directly to a supported operating system via our automated installer.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana