StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Passenger vs Uvicorn

Passenger vs Uvicorn

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Passenger
Passenger
Stacks1.4K
Followers298
Votes199
GitHub Stars5.1K
Forks557
Uvicorn
Uvicorn
Stacks168
Followers119
Votes0

Passenger vs Uvicorn: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Passenger and Uvicorn

Phusion Passenger and Uvicorn are both web servers commonly used in Python web development. Although they serve the same purpose, they have some key differences that set them apart. The differences are as follows:

  1. Concurrency Model: Passenger is based on a process-based concurrency model, where multiple instances of the application run in separate processes and can handle requests concurrently. On the other hand, Uvicorn is based on an asynchronous event-driven concurrency model using the ASGI specification, allowing it to handle multiple requests concurrently within a single process.

  2. Protocol Support: Passenger primarily focuses on supporting the HTTP and HTTPS protocols. It can handle HTTP/1.x and HTTP/2 requests, as well as WebSockets. Uvicorn, on the other hand, also supports the HTTP and HTTPS protocols but specifically targets the ASGI protocol, enabling seamless integration with ASGI-compliant frameworks and tools.

  3. Framework Compatibility: Passenger is designed to work with various web frameworks, including Ruby, Python, and Node.js frameworks. It provides easy integration with applications built on frameworks like Ruby on Rails, Sinatra, Django, Flask, etc. Uvicorn, however, is primarily focused on Python web frameworks and is optimized for ASGI-based frameworks such as Django, FastAPI, Starlette, etc.

  4. Configuration: Passenger offers a configuration file, typically written in Ruby or JSON, to define various server settings and options. It allows for fine-grained configuration and tuning of application-specific parameters. Uvicorn, on the other hand, uses command-line arguments or environment variables for configuration. This minimalist approach makes it easier to deploy and manage Uvicorn applications using standard tools and practices.

  5. Platform Support: Passenger supports a wide range of operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows. It integrates deeply with web servers like Apache and Nginx to provide additional features and scalability options. Uvicorn, being a pure-Python web server, is platform-agnostic and can run on any operating system that supports Python.

  6. Performance and Scalability: Passenger is known for its high performance and scalability, especially when used with a cluster setup and load balancers. It is optimized for handling a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. Uvicorn, leveraging asynchronous programming and event loops, also offers excellent performance and scalability, particularly for I/O-bound tasks like handling many concurrent requests or long-polling.

In summary, Passenger and Uvicorn differ in their concurrency models, protocol support, framework compatibility, configuration methods, platform support, and performance/scalability characteristics, making each of them suitable for specific use cases and preferences in Python web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Passenger
Passenger
Uvicorn
Uvicorn

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

It is a lightning-fast ASGI server, built on uvloop and httptools. Until recently Python has lacked a minimal low-level server/application interface for asyncio frameworks. The ASGI specification fills this gap, and means we're now able to start building a common set of tooling usable across all asyncio frameworks.

-
ASGI server implementation; Supports HTTP/1.1 and WebSockets; Support for HTTP/2 is planned
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
557
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
168
Followers
298
Followers
119
Votes
199
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 43
    Nginx integration
  • 36
    Great for rails
  • 21
    Fast web server
  • 19
    Free
  • 15
    Lightweight
Cons
  • 0
    Cost (some features require paid/pro)
No community feedback yet
Integrations
NGINX
NGINX
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Node.js
Node.js
Meteor
Meteor
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Passenger, Uvicorn?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase