StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs Payara

Apache Tomcat vs Payara

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K
Payara
Payara
Stacks41
Followers73
Votes0
GitHub Stars903
Forks312

Apache Tomcat vs Payara: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Tomcat and Payara are both popular server containers for running Java applications. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two that distinguish them in terms of features and functionalities.

  1. Deployment: Apache Tomcat is a lightweight server container primarily designed for running Java servlets and JSPs. It focuses on providing a basic servlet container and requires additional configuration for advanced Java EE features. On the other hand, Payara is a full-featured application server built on top of GlassFish, offering a wide range of Java EE capabilities out-of-the-box, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications.

  2. Support and Maintenance: Apache Tomcat is an open-source project with a large community of contributors, providing continuous updates, bug fixes, and security patches. However, the level of support and maintenance may vary depending on the resources available within the community. Payara, on the other hand, is a commercially supported product with dedicated technical support, regular updates, and long-term support options, ensuring a higher level of reliability and stability.

  3. Administration and Monitoring: Apache Tomcat provides basic administration and monitoring capabilities through its web-based management interface. While it allows managing server resources and web applications, it may require additional setup for more advanced management tasks. Payara, on the other hand, offers an extensive administration and monitoring console with a user-friendly interface, providing advanced features such as cluster management, application profiling, and monitoring.

  4. Clustering and High Availability: In Apache Tomcat, setting up clustering and achieving high availability requires additional manual configuration, including load balancing and session replication. Payara, being a full-fledged application server, offers built-in clustering capabilities with easy configuration, automatic load balancing, and session failover, making it more suitable for scalable and highly available deployments.

  5. Microservices Support: Payara supports microservices architecture out-of-the-box by incorporating Eclipse MicroProfile, a set of specifications for building cloud-native applications. It provides features such as service discovery, fault tolerance, and health checks, enabling developers to quickly build and deploy microservices-based applications. Apache Tomcat, being a more lightweight servlet container, lacks built-in support for microservices and requires additional libraries and frameworks to implement similar functionality.

  6. Extensibility and Integration: Payara offers seamless integration with various frameworks, tools, and technologies from the Java EE ecosystem. It supports popular frameworks like Hibernate, CDI, and JPA, making it easier to develop and deploy enterprise applications. While Apache Tomcat can also be extended with various libraries and frameworks, it may require additional configuration and setup to integrate them seamlessly.

In summary, Apache Tomcat is a lightweight servlet container ideal for simple Java web applications, while Payara is a full-featured application server designed for complex enterprise applications, offering advanced features, commercial support, and microservices support out-of-the-box.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Tomcat, Payara

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Payara
Payara

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

It Server is a drop in replacement for GlassFish Server Open Source Edition with quarterly releases containing enhancements, bug fixes and patches.

-
Full Web Based Administration Console; Fully Scriptable Command Line Interface; Full REST-based Management Console; Fully Instrumented via JMX; Supports Rolling Upgrades of Java EE Applications
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Stars
903
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
312
Stacks
16.9K
Stacks
41
Followers
12.6K
Followers
73
Votes
201
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
CentOS
CentOS
Oracle
Oracle
Windows
Windows
Ubuntu
Ubuntu

What are some alternatives to Apache Tomcat, Payara?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase