StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Payara vs Websphere

Payara vs Websphere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Websphere
Websphere
Stacks99
Followers92
Votes0
Payara
Payara
Stacks41
Followers73
Votes0
GitHub Stars903
Forks312

Payara vs Websphere: What are the differences?

Introduction:

This markdown provides a comparison between Payara and Websphere, highlighting the key differences between the two.

  1. License: Payara is an open-source application server derived from GlassFish, and it is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) version 2.1. On the other hand, Websphere is a commercial application server developed by IBM, and it requires a paid license for usage.

  2. Community Support: Payara benefits from a thriving and active community support, with regular updates, bug fixes, and frequent releases. It also offers a responsive online forum and mailing list. In contrast, Websphere has a more limited community support, with development primarily driven by IBM, which can result in slower updates and less frequent community contributions.

  3. Ease of Use: Payara provides a user-friendly interface and straightforward configuration, making it relatively easy to set up and manage. It offers simplified administration and deployment processes, as well as comprehensive documentation. Websphere, on the other hand, tends to have a steeper learning curve and can be more complex to configure and administer due to its extensive feature set and advanced capabilities.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Payara is designed for high performance and scalability, providing efficient resource management and horizontal scaling capabilities. It supports modern technologies like MicroProfile and Jakarta EE, optimizing performance for cloud-native applications. Websphere also offers scalability and performance features, but due to its enterprise nature, it can be more resource-intensive, making it better suited for larger environments.

  5. Integration and Interoperability: Payara supports various programming languages, frameworks, and technologies, offering a broad range of integration options. It also provides seamless interoperability with other platforms, containers, and databases. Websphere, being an IBM product, excels in integrating with other IBM products and technologies out of the box, but it may require additional configuration and effort when integrating with non-IBM tools.

  6. Cost: Payara, being open-source, is free to use, with no licensing costs involved. It offers enterprise-level features without the need for a substantial financial investment. Websphere, on the other hand, is a commercial product that requires a paid license, which can result in significant licensing costs, particularly for larger deployments.

In Summary, Payara is an open-source, community-driven application server with easy-to-use features, strong community support, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. Websphere, on the other hand, is a commercial product developed by IBM, providing enterprise-level integration capabilities and advanced features, but with a steeper learning curve and higher licensing costs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Websphere
Websphere
Payara
Payara

It is a highly scalable, secure and reliable Java EE runtime environment designed to host applications and microservices for any size organization. It supports the Java EE, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile standards-based programming models.

It Server is a drop in replacement for GlassFish Server Open Source Edition with quarterly releases containing enhancements, bug fixes and patches.

-
Full Web Based Administration Console; Fully Scriptable Command Line Interface; Full REST-based Management Console; Fully Instrumented via JMX; Supports Rolling Upgrades of Java EE Applications
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
903
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
312
Stacks
99
Stacks
41
Followers
92
Followers
73
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
CentOS
CentOS
Oracle
Oracle
Windows
Windows
Ubuntu
Ubuntu

What are some alternatives to Websphere, Payara?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase