PDF.js vs SVG.js

Overview

PDF.js

Stacks241

Followers86

Votes0

GitHub Stars52.2K

Forks10.5K

SVG.js

Stacks14

Followers12

Votes0

GitHub Stars11.5K

Forks1.1K

PDF.js vs SVG.js: What are the differences?

File Format: PDF.js is primarily used for rendering PDF files, while SVG.js is used for creating and manipulating Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) files. PDF.js focuses on displaying PDF documents in a web browser, while SVG.js is more versatile in creating interactive vector graphics on the web.
Rendering: PDF.js renders PDF files as visual documents that closely resemble their printed counterparts, displaying text, images, and formatting accurately. In contrast, SVG.js renders vector graphics that are scalable and resolution-independent, making them ideal for responsive web design and animations.
Interactivity: SVG.js provides extensive interactivity features, allowing developers to create interactive elements within their SVG graphics such as animations, events, and user interactions. On the other hand, while PDF.js supports text selection, highlighting, and annotations, it offers limited interactivity compared to SVG.js.
Complexity: PDF.js is designed to handle the complex structure and layout of PDF documents, including handling multiple pages, embedded fonts, and complex formatting. SVG.js, on the other hand, focuses on creating simple and lightweight vector graphics, making it easier to work with for web developers.
Browser Support: PDF.js is supported by major web browsers and can render PDF files directly within the browser without the need for third-party plugins. In contrast, while SVG.js is also well-supported by browsers, it may require additional libraries or plugins for certain advanced features or older browser versions.
Use Cases: PDF.js is commonly used for displaying documents such as reports, manuals, or brochures that are traditionally distributed in PDF format. SVG.js, on the other hand, is widely used for creating visual elements on websites, such as icons, illustrations, animations, and interactive graphics.

In Summary, PDF.js is designed for rendering PDF documents with a focus on accurate representation and limited interactivity, while SVG.js is used for creating interactive and scalable vector graphics on the web.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

PDF.js	SVG.js
It is a Portable Document Format (PDF) viewer that is built with HTML5. It is community-driven and supported by Mozilla Labs. The goal is to create a general-purpose, web standards-based platform for parsing and rendering PDFs.	The lightweight library for manipulating and animating SVG. It has no dependencies and aims to be as small as possible.
General-purpose;Platform for parsing and rendering PDFs;Built with HTML5	Animations on size, position, transformations, color,... ; Painless extension thanks to the modular structure; Various useful plugins available; Unified api between shape types with move, size, center, ...; Binding events to elements; Full support for opacity masks and clipping paths; Text paths, even animated; Element groups; Dynamic gradients and patterns
Statistics
GitHub Stars 52.2K	GitHub Stars 11.5K
GitHub Forks 10.5K	GitHub Forks 1.1K
Stacks 241	Stacks 14
Followers 86	Followers 12
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
HTML5 JavaScript Firefox Google Chrome	JavaScript

What are some alternatives to PDF.js, SVG.js?

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Lodash

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Related Comparisons

PDF.js vs SVG.js: What are the differences?

File Format: PDF.js is primarily used for rendering PDF files, while SVG.js is used for creating and manipulating Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) files. PDF.js focuses on displaying PDF documents in a web browser, while SVG.js is more versatile in creating interactive vector graphics on the web.
Rendering: PDF.js renders PDF files as visual documents that closely resemble their printed counterparts, displaying text, images, and formatting accurately. In contrast, SVG.js renders vector graphics that are scalable and resolution-independent, making them ideal for responsive web design and animations.
Interactivity: SVG.js provides extensive interactivity features, allowing developers to create interactive elements within their SVG graphics such as animations, events, and user interactions. On the other hand, while PDF.js supports text selection, highlighting, and annotations, it offers limited interactivity compared to SVG.js.
Complexity: PDF.js is designed to handle the complex structure and layout of PDF documents, including handling multiple pages, embedded fonts, and complex formatting. SVG.js, on the other hand, focuses on creating simple and lightweight vector graphics, making it easier to work with for web developers.
Browser Support: PDF.js is supported by major web browsers and can render PDF files directly within the browser without the need for third-party plugins. In contrast, while SVG.js is also well-supported by browsers, it may require additional libraries or plugins for certain advanced features or older browser versions.
Use Cases: PDF.js is commonly used for displaying documents such as reports, manuals, or brochures that are traditionally distributed in PDF format. SVG.js, on the other hand, is widely used for creating visual elements on websites, such as icons, illustrations, animations, and interactive graphics.

PDF.js vs SVG.js

Overview