Raccoon vs pfSense

Overview

pfSense

Stacks109

Followers95

Votes0

Raccoon

Stacks1

Followers2

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.3K

Forks418

Raccoon vs pfSense: What are the differences?

Introduction: Raccoon and pfSense are both popular network security solutions that offer various features to protect networks from cyber threats. However, there are key differences between these two platforms that set them apart.

Usage: Raccoon is a lightweight, open-source VPN client that focuses solely on providing secure VPN connections for individual users. On the other hand, pfSense is a robust, open-source firewall and routing solution designed for use in enterprise-grade networks. While Raccoon is more suitable for personal use, pfSense is tailored for businesses and organizations with more complex network security requirements.
Community Support: pfSense has a larger and more active user community compared to Raccoon. This means that users of pfSense can benefit from a wealth of resources, forums, and user-generated content to troubleshoot issues, seek advice, and make the most of the platform's features. On the other hand, Raccoon may have limited community support available, which could pose challenges for users looking for assistance.
Customizability and Features: pfSense offers extensive customizability and a wide range of features including VPN support, captive portal, traffic shaping, and more. Users can configure pfSense to meet their specific network security needs and control every aspect of their network. On the other hand, Raccoon is more straightforward and may lack the advanced features and customization options provided by pfSense.
Scalability: pfSense is scalable and can be deployed in small to large-scale networks, making it suitable for a variety of network sizes. It can handle high traffic volumes and complex network architectures efficiently. In contrast, Raccoon is designed for individual users and may not be as scalable or as robust as pfSense when it comes to supporting larger networks with extensive security requirements.
Cost: Raccoon is a free and open-source software with no licensing fees, making it an affordable option for individual users looking for a reliable VPN client. On the other hand, pfSense offers a free community edition with limited support, but businesses and organizations may need to invest in the commercial support subscription for advanced features, support, and updates.
User Interface: pfSense offers a user-friendly web-based interface that allows users to manage and configure their network security settings with ease. The interface is intuitive and well-organized, making it accessible even for users with limited technical expertise. Raccoon, being a VPN client, may have a simpler interface focused on connecting to VPN servers rather than extensive network configuration options.

In Summary, Raccoon and pfSense differ in terms of usage, community support, customizability, scalability, cost, and user interface, catering to different user needs and network security requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

pfSense	Raccoon
It is an open source firewall/router computer software distribution based on FreeBSD. It is installed on a physical computer or a virtual machine to make a dedicated firewall/router for a network.	It is a tool made for reconnaissance and information gathering with an emphasis on simplicity. It will do everything from fetching DNS records, retrieving WHOIS information, obtaining TLS data, detecting WAF presence and up to threaded dir busting and subdomain enumeration. Every scan outputs to a corresponding file.
Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI); GeoIP blocking	DNS details; DNS visual mapping using DNS dumpster; WHOIS information; TLS Data - supported ciphers, TLS versions, certificate details and SANs; Port Scan; Services and scripts scan; URL fuzzing and dir/file detection; Subdomain enumeration - uses Google dorking, DNS dumpster queries, SAN discovery and bruteforce; Web application data retrieval: CMS detection, Web server info and X-Powered-By, robots.txt and sitemap extraction, Cookie inspection, Extracts all fuzzable URLs, Discovers HTML forms, Retrieves all Email addresses, Scans target for vulnerable S3 buckets and enumerates them for sensitive files; Detects known WAFs; Supports anonymous routing through Tor/Proxies; Uses asyncio for improved performance; Saves output to files - separates targets by folders and modules by files
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 3.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 418
Stacks 109	Stacks 1
Followers 95	Followers 2
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Squid OpenVPN OpenLDAP	macOS

What are some alternatives to pfSense, Raccoon?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Raccoon vs pfSense: What are the differences?

Usage: Raccoon is a lightweight, open-source VPN client that focuses solely on providing secure VPN connections for individual users. On the other hand, pfSense is a robust, open-source firewall and routing solution designed for use in enterprise-grade networks. While Raccoon is more suitable for personal use, pfSense is tailored for businesses and organizations with more complex network security requirements.
Community Support: pfSense has a larger and more active user community compared to Raccoon. This means that users of pfSense can benefit from a wealth of resources, forums, and user-generated content to troubleshoot issues, seek advice, and make the most of the platform's features. On the other hand, Raccoon may have limited community support available, which could pose challenges for users looking for assistance.
Customizability and Features: pfSense offers extensive customizability and a wide range of features including VPN support, captive portal, traffic shaping, and more. Users can configure pfSense to meet their specific network security needs and control every aspect of their network. On the other hand, Raccoon is more straightforward and may lack the advanced features and customization options provided by pfSense.
Scalability: pfSense is scalable and can be deployed in small to large-scale networks, making it suitable for a variety of network sizes. It can handle high traffic volumes and complex network architectures efficiently. In contrast, Raccoon is designed for individual users and may not be as scalable or as robust as pfSense when it comes to supporting larger networks with extensive security requirements.
Cost: Raccoon is a free and open-source software with no licensing fees, making it an affordable option for individual users looking for a reliable VPN client. On the other hand, pfSense offers a free community edition with limited support, but businesses and organizations may need to invest in the commercial support subscription for advanced features, support, and updates.
User Interface: pfSense offers a user-friendly web-based interface that allows users to manage and configure their network security settings with ease. The interface is intuitive and well-organized, making it accessible even for users with limited technical expertise. Raccoon, being a VPN client, may have a simpler interface focused on connecting to VPN servers rather than extensive network configuration options.

Raccoon vs pfSense

Overview