PHP-FPM vs Sidekiq

Overview

Sidekiq

Stacks1.2K

Followers632

Votes408

PHP-FPM

Stacks121

Followers119

Votes0

PHP-FPM vs Sidekiq: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between PHP-FPM and Sidekiq, two popular tools used in web development and server-side processes.

Architecture: PHP-FPM is a FastCGI process manager designed specifically for handling PHP scripts, while Sidekiq is a background job processing system that utilizes Ruby. PHP-FPM manages multiple instances of PHP scripts to improve performance and resource management, whereas Sidekiq processes asynchronous jobs that can be queued and executed in the background.
Language Support: PHP-FPM is tailored for PHP applications, ensuring optimal performance and compatibility with PHP-specific features and functions. On the other hand, Sidekiq is built for Ruby applications, providing seamless integration with Ruby frameworks and libraries. The choice between PHP-FPM and Sidekiq largely depends on the programming language used in the project.
Concurrency Model: PHP-FPM utilizes process-based concurrency where each PHP process handles a single request at a time. In contrast, Sidekiq employs thread-based concurrency, allowing multiple jobs to be processed concurrently within the same Ruby process. The concurrency model impacts scalability and efficiency in handling multiple requests or jobs simultaneously.
Community and Support: PHP-FPM benefits from the large PHP community and extensive support resources available online. Sidekiq, being based on Ruby, leverages the vibrant Ruby community for assistance, documentation, and plugin development. The level of community engagement and support can influence the ease of troubleshooting issues and adopting new features.
Memory Management: PHP-FPM uses a separate pool of PHP processes that are managed by the FastCGI process manager, optimizing memory consumption and performance for each PHP script. In comparison, Sidekiq manages memory more efficiently by using a shared memory pool within the Ruby process, reducing memory overhead and improving overall performance in processing background jobs.
Deployment Flexibility: PHP-FPM is commonly used with web servers like Nginx and Apache to serve PHP web applications, offering seamless integration and deployment options. In contrast, Sidekiq is typically integrated with Ruby on Rails applications to handle background job processing, providing a scalable solution for managing tasks asynchronously. The deployment flexibility of PHP-FPM and Sidekiq caters to different architectural requirements in web development projects.

In Summary, PHP-FPM and Sidekiq differ in their architecture, language support, concurrency model, community and support, memory management, and deployment flexibility, catering to distinct needs in web development and server-side processing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sidekiq	PHP-FPM
Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.	It is an alternative PHP FastCGI implementation with some additional features useful for sites of any size, especially busier sites. It includes Adaptive process spawning, Advanced process management with graceful stop/start, Emergency restart in case of accidental opcode cache destruction etc.
Statistics
Stacks 1.2K	Stacks 121
Followers 632	Followers 119
Votes 408	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 124 Simple 99 Efficient background processing 60 Scalability 37 Better then resque 26 Great documentation	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Sidekiq, PHP-FPM?

Beanstalkd

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

Hangfire

It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

Resque

Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.

delayed_job

Delayed_job (or DJ) encapsulates the common pattern of asynchronously executing longer tasks in the background. It is a direct extraction from Shopify where the job table is responsible for a multitude of core tasks.

Faktory

Redis -> Sidekiq == Faktory -> Faktory. Faktory is a server daemon which provides a simple API to produce and consume background jobs. Jobs are a small JSON hash with a few mandatory keys.

Kue

Kue is a feature rich priority job queue for node.js backed by redis. A key feature of Kue is its clean user-interface for viewing and managing queued, active, failed, and completed jobs.

Bull

The fastest, most reliable, Redis-based queue for Node. Carefully written for rock solid stability and atomicity.

Cron

Background-only application which launches and runs other applications, or opens documents, at specified dates and times.

Que

Que is a high-performance alternative to DelayedJob or QueueClassic that improves the reliability of your application by protecting your jobs with the same ACID guarantees as the rest of your data.

Goose

It is a simple, reliable & scalable background processing library for Clojure. It has a transparent design & cloud-native architecture.

Related Comparisons

PHP-FPM vs Sidekiq: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between PHP-FPM and Sidekiq, two popular tools used in web development and server-side processes.

Architecture: PHP-FPM is a FastCGI process manager designed specifically for handling PHP scripts, while Sidekiq is a background job processing system that utilizes Ruby. PHP-FPM manages multiple instances of PHP scripts to improve performance and resource management, whereas Sidekiq processes asynchronous jobs that can be queued and executed in the background.
Language Support: PHP-FPM is tailored for PHP applications, ensuring optimal performance and compatibility with PHP-specific features and functions. On the other hand, Sidekiq is built for Ruby applications, providing seamless integration with Ruby frameworks and libraries. The choice between PHP-FPM and Sidekiq largely depends on the programming language used in the project.
Concurrency Model: PHP-FPM utilizes process-based concurrency where each PHP process handles a single request at a time. In contrast, Sidekiq employs thread-based concurrency, allowing multiple jobs to be processed concurrently within the same Ruby process. The concurrency model impacts scalability and efficiency in handling multiple requests or jobs simultaneously.
Community and Support: PHP-FPM benefits from the large PHP community and extensive support resources available online. Sidekiq, being based on Ruby, leverages the vibrant Ruby community for assistance, documentation, and plugin development. The level of community engagement and support can influence the ease of troubleshooting issues and adopting new features.
Memory Management: PHP-FPM uses a separate pool of PHP processes that are managed by the FastCGI process manager, optimizing memory consumption and performance for each PHP script. In comparison, Sidekiq manages memory more efficiently by using a shared memory pool within the Ruby process, reducing memory overhead and improving overall performance in processing background jobs.
Deployment Flexibility: PHP-FPM is commonly used with web servers like Nginx and Apache to serve PHP web applications, offering seamless integration and deployment options. In contrast, Sidekiq is typically integrated with Ruby on Rails applications to handle background job processing, providing a scalable solution for managing tasks asynchronously. The deployment flexibility of PHP-FPM and Sidekiq caters to different architectural requirements in web development projects.

PHP-FPM vs Sidekiq

Overview

PHP-FPM vs Sidekiq: What are the differences?