Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Play vs UDash: What are the differences?
Play: The High Velocity Web Framework For Java and Scala. Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications; UDash: Scala and Scala.js Reactive Web Framework. A Scala.js framework for building beautiful and maintainable web applications.
Play and UDash are primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" and "Front-End Frameworks" tools respectively.
Play and UDash are both open source tools. It seems that Play with 11.2K GitHub stars and 3.77K forks on GitHub has more adoption than UDash with 348 GitHub stars and 28 GitHub forks.
Pros of Play
- Scala81
- Web-friendly architecture55
- Built on akka55
- Stateless50
- High-scalable47
- Fast46
- Open source40
- Java34
- High velocity27
- Fun24
- Lightweight9
- Non-blocking io8
- Developer friendly6
- Simple template engine5
- Scalability4
- Pure love3
- Resource efficient2
Pros of UDash
- Shared scala code1
- Type-safe1
- Compiled to JS1
- Reactive Data Bindings1
- Type-safe RPC & REST1
- User Interface Components1
- Type-safe CSS1
- I18n1
- Generator1
- Backend independent1
- IDE support1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Play
- Evolves fast, keep up with releases3
- Unnecessarily complicated1