Play vs UDash: What are the differences?
Play: The High Velocity Web Framework For Java and Scala. Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications; UDash: Scala and Scala.js Reactive Web Framework. A Scala.js framework for building beautiful and maintainable web applications.
Play and UDash are primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" and "Front-End Frameworks" tools respectively.
Play and UDash are both open source tools. It seems that Play with 11.2K GitHub stars and 3.77K forks on GitHub has more adoption than UDash with 348 GitHub stars and 28 GitHub forks.
What is Play?
What is UDash?
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using UDash?
What companies use UDash?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Play is a central framework/component/library (not sure what to call things these days) in Scala. We <3 Scala, and therefore we <3 Play.
Play is on of several frameworks we are prototyping and vetting for various public-facing websites, and may ultimately be the framework behind the main datapile.io website.
I used Play to build a configuration UI for the service, which let you create and manage the menus (a hierarchical tree of options and actions).