StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Polymer vs React

Polymer vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Polymer
Polymer
Stacks557
Followers463
Votes122
GitHub Stars22.1K
Forks2.0K

Polymer vs React: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Polymer and React

Polymer and React are both popular JavaScript libraries used for building web applications. They offer different approaches and features, making them suitable for different use cases and preferences. Below are the key differences between Polymer and React:

  1. Architecture and Approach: Polymer follows a component-based architecture where UI elements are created as custom elements. It embraces the concept of Web Components, allowing developers to use reusable custom elements anywhere in their application. On the other hand, React follows a virtual DOM-based architecture. It provides a declarative approach where UI components are represented as JavaScript functions that return a tree of React elements.

  2. Performance: React is known for its efficient rendering algorithm and virtual DOM. It compares the virtual DOM with the real DOM, minimizing actual DOM manipulations. This approach results in better performance, especially for complex applications with frequent updates. Polymer, on the other hand, uses a more lightweight templating system that directly updates the DOM. While it can offer good performance for simpler applications, it may struggle with larger and more dynamic apps.

  3. Ecosystem and Community Support: React has a large and active community with a vast ecosystem of reusable components and libraries. It has gained significant popularity over the years, and many industry-proven tools and frameworks integrate well with React. Polymer, although having a dedicated community, is relatively smaller compared to React. This might result in fewer resources and support options when using Polymer.

  4. Learning Curve: React has a steeper learning curve compared to Polymer. React introduces its own concepts like JSX syntax, virtual DOM, and component lifecycle, which might require some time and effort to grasp. In contrast, Polymer follows standard web standards and uses HTML templates, making it more familiar and easier to learn for developers who already have experience with web development.

  5. Browser Support: Polymer has a wider browser support compared to React. It focuses on compatibility with older browsers and uses polyfills to bring the Web Components standards to those browsers that lack native support. React, on the other hand, is built with modern browser capabilities in mind and may not work or require additional configuration for older browsers.

  6. Interoperability: Polymer is designed to work well with other frameworks and libraries. It encourages the usage of Web Components, which can be used with any JavaScript framework. React, on the other hand, is more self-contained and provides solutions for many common web development needs out of the box. While it is possible to integrate React with other frameworks, it may require more effort and knowledge of the underlying compatibility considerations.

In summary, Polymer focuses on Web Components and embraces the concept of reusable custom elements, while React offers a virtual DOM-based architecture and a larger ecosystem. React has better performance, a larger community, and a steeper learning curve compared to Polymer.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Polymer

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Polymer
Polymer

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Polymer is a new type of library for the web, designed to leverage the existing browser infrastructure to provide the encapsulation and extendability currently only available in JS libraries. Polymer is based on a set of future technologies, including Shadow DOM, Custom Elements and Model Driven Views. Currently these technologies are implemented as polyfills or shims, but as browsers adopt these features natively, the platform code that drives Polymer evacipates, leaving only the value-adds.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
22.1K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
557
Followers
147.0K
Followers
463
Votes
4.1K
Votes
122
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 52
    Web components
  • 30
    Material design
  • 14
    HTML
  • 13
    Components
  • 5
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Last version is like 2 years ago? that's totally rad

What are some alternatives to React, Polymer?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase