PostgreSQL vs Sequel Pro

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

19.1K
14.8K
+ 1
3.4K
Sequel Pro
Sequel Pro

239
169
+ 1
63
Add tool

PostgreSQL vs Sequel Pro: What are the differences?

Developers describe PostgreSQL as "A powerful, open source object-relational database system". PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions. On the other hand, Sequel Pro is detailed as "MySQL database management for Mac OS X". Sequel Pro is a fast, easy-to-use Mac database management application for working with MySQL databases.

PostgreSQL and Sequel Pro are primarily classified as "Databases" and "Database" tools respectively.

"Relational database" is the primary reason why developers consider PostgreSQL over the competitors, whereas "Free" was stated as the key factor in picking Sequel Pro.

PostgreSQL and Sequel Pro are both open source tools. It seems that Sequel Pro with 6.73K GitHub stars and 589 forks on GitHub has more adoption than PostgreSQL with 5.44K GitHub stars and 1.8K GitHub forks.

Uber Technologies, Spotify, and Netflix are some of the popular companies that use PostgreSQL, whereas Sequel Pro is used by Movielala, Algorithmia, and Punchh. PostgreSQL has a broader approval, being mentioned in 2741 company stacks & 2176 developers stacks; compared to Sequel Pro, which is listed in 46 company stacks and 23 developer stacks.

What is PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

What is Sequel Pro?

Sequel Pro is a fast, easy-to-use Mac database management application for working with MySQL databases.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose PostgreSQL?
Why do developers choose Sequel Pro?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use PostgreSQL?
    What companies use Sequel Pro?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with PostgreSQL?
    What tools integrate with Sequel Pro?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to PostgreSQL and Sequel Pro?
    MySQL
    The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
    MariaDB
    Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.
    Oracle
    Oracle Database is an RDBMS. An RDBMS that implements object-oriented features such as user-defined types, inheritance, and polymorphism is called an object-relational database management system (ORDBMS). Oracle Database has extended the relational model to an object-relational model, making it possible to store complex business models in a relational database.
    MongoDB
    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
    SQLite
    SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about PostgreSQL and Sequel Pro
    Anton Sidelnikov
    Anton Sidelnikov
    Backend Developer at Beamery · | 8 upvotes · 9.5K views
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL
    MongoDB
    MongoDB

    In my opinion PostgreSQL is totally over MongoDB - not only works with structured data & SQL & strict types, but also has excellent support for unstructured data as separate data type (you can store arbitrary JSONs - and they may be also queryable, depending on one of format's you may choose). Both writes & reads are much faster, then in Mongo. So you can get best on Document NoSQL & SQL in single database..

    Formal downside of PostgreSQL is clustering scalability. There's not simple way to build distributed a cluster. However, two points:

    1) You will need much more time before you need to actually scale due to PG's efficiency. And if you follow database-per-service pattern, maybe you won't need ever, cause dealing few billion records on single machine is an option for PG.

    2) When you need to - you do it in a way you need, including as a part of app's logic (e.g. sharding by key, or PG-based clustering solution with strict model), scalability will be very transparent, much more obvious than Mongo's "cluster just works (but then fails)" replication.

    See more
    Yonas Beshawred
    Yonas Beshawred
    CEO at StackShare · | 9 upvotes · 34.5K views
    atStackShareStackShare
    MemCachier
    MemCachier
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL
    Rails
    Rails
    Amazon ElastiCache
    Amazon ElastiCache
    Heroku
    Heroku
    Memcached
    Memcached
    #Caching
    #RailsCaching

    We decided to use MemCachier as our Memcached provider because we were seeing some serious PostgreSQL performance issues with query-heavy pages on the site. We use MemCachier for all Rails caching and pretty aggressively too for the logged out experience (fully cached pages for the most part). We really need to move to Amazon ElastiCache as soon as possible so we can stop paying so much. The only reason we're not moving is because there are some restrictions on the network side due to our main app being hosted on Heroku.

    #Caching #RailsCaching

    See more
    John Kodumal
    John Kodumal
    CTO at LaunchDarkly · | 15 upvotes · 265.7K views
    atLaunchDarklyLaunchDarkly
    Amazon RDS
    Amazon RDS
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL
    TimescaleDB
    TimescaleDB
    Patroni
    Patroni
    Consul
    Consul
    Amazon ElastiCache
    Amazon ElastiCache
    Amazon EC2
    Amazon EC2
    Redis
    Redis
    Amazon Kinesis
    Amazon Kinesis
    Kafka
    Kafka

    As we've evolved or added additional infrastructure to our stack, we've biased towards managed services. Most new backing stores are Amazon RDS instances now. We do use self-managed PostgreSQL with TimescaleDB for time-series data—this is made HA with the use of Patroni and Consul.

    We also use managed Amazon ElastiCache instances instead of spinning up Amazon EC2 instances to run Redis workloads, as well as shifting to Amazon Kinesis instead of Kafka.

    See more
    Joshua Dean Küpper
    Joshua Dean Küpper
    CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 5 upvotes · 83.4K views
    atScrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt)Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
    MariaDB
    MariaDB
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL
    GitLab
    GitLab
    Sentry
    Sentry

    We primarily use MariaDB but use PostgreSQL as a part of GitLab , Sentry and @Nextcloud , which (initially) forced us to use it anyways. While this isn't much of a decision – because we didn't have one (ha ha) – we learned to love the perks and advantages of PostgreSQL anyways. PostgreSQLs extension system makes it even more flexible than a lot of the other SQL-based DBs (that only offer stored procedures) and the additional JOIN options, the enhanced role management and the different authentication options came in really handy, when doing manual maintenance on the databases.

    See more
    Alex A
    Alex A
    Founder at PRIZ Guru · | 6 upvotes · 8.6K views
    atPRIZ GuruPRIZ Guru
    MySQL
    MySQL
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL

    One of our battles at the very beginning of the road was choosing the right database. In fact, our first prototype was built on MySQL and back then nothing else was even under a consideration (don't ask me why). At some point, I was working on a project which was running on PostgreSQL and it is only then I understood the full power of it. We have over a billion of records in production instance, and we are able to optimize it to run fast and reliable. Well, now my default DB is PostgreSQL :)

    See more
    Tim Nolet
    Tim Nolet
    Founder, Engineer & Dishwasher at Checkly · | 8 upvotes · 68.8K views
    atChecklyHQChecklyHQ
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL
    Heroku
    Heroku
    Node.js
    Node.js
    MongoDB
    MongoDB
    Amazon DynamoDB
    Amazon DynamoDB

    PostgreSQL Heroku Node.js MongoDB Amazon DynamoDB

    When I started building Checkly, one of the first things on the agenda was how to actually structure our SaaS database model: think accounts, users, subscriptions etc. Weirdly, there is not a lot of information on this on the "blogopshere" (cringe...). After research and some false starts with MongoDB and Amazon DynamoDB we ended up with PostgreSQL and a schema consisting of just four tables that form the backbone of all generic "Saasy" stuff almost any B2B SaaS bumps into.

    In a nutshell:cPostgreSQL Heroku Node.js MongoDB Amazon DynamoDB

    When I started building Checkly, one of the first things on the agenda was how to actually structure our SaaS database model: think accounts, users, subscriptions etc. Weirdly, there is not a lot of information on this on the "blogopshere" (cringe...). After research and some false starts with MongoDB and Amazon DynamoDB we ended up with PostgreSQL and a schema consisting of just four tables that form the backbone of all generic "Saasy" stuff almost any B2B SaaS bumps into.

    In a nutshell:

    • We use Postgres on Heroku.
    • We use a "one database, on schema" approach for partitioning customer data.
    • We use an accounts, memberships and users table to create a many-to-many relation between users and accounts.
    • We completely decouple prices, payments and the exact ingredients for a customer's plan.

    All the details including a database schema diagram are in the linked blog post.

    See more
    Łukasz Korecki
    Łukasz Korecki
    CTO & Co-founder at EnjoyHQ · | 12 upvotes · 83.1K views
    atEnjoyHQEnjoyHQ
    RethinkDB
    RethinkDB
    MongoDB
    MongoDB
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL

    We initially chose RethinkDB because of the schema-less document store features, and better durability resilience/story than MongoDB In the end, it didn't work out quite as we expected: there's plenty of scalability issues, it's near impossible to run analytical workloads and small community makes working with Rethink a challenge. We're in process of migrating all our workloads to PostgreSQL and hopefully, we will be able to decommission our RethinkDB deployment soon.

    See more
    Mauro Bennici
    Mauro Bennici
    CTO at You Are My GUide · | 7 upvotes · 24K views
    atYou Are My GUideYou Are My GUide
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL
    TimescaleDB
    TimescaleDB
    MongoDB
    MongoDB

    PostgreSQL plus TimescaleDB allow us to concentrate the business effort on how to analyze valuable data instead of manage them on IT side. We are now able to ingest thousand of social shares "managed" data without compromise the scalability of the system or the time query. TimescaleDB is transparent to PostgreSQL , so we continue to use the same SQL syntax without any changes. At the same time, because we need to manage few document objects we dismissed the MongoDB cluster.

    See more
    Tor Hagemann
    Tor Hagemann
    at Socotra · | 2 upvotes · 2.2K views
    atSocotraSocotra
    MySQL
    MySQL
    PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL
    Amazon DynamoDB
    Amazon DynamoDB

    Much of our data model is relational, which makes MySQL or PostgreSQL (and family) fit the API's we need to build, in order to meet the needs of our customers.

    Sometimes the flexibility of a NoSQL store like Amazon DynamoDB is very useful, but the lack of consistency really impacts usability and performance long-term, compared with viable alternatives. At our current scale, we've seen huge benefits from moving some of our tables out of Dynamo and doing more in SQL.

    There will always be use cases for NoSQL and key-values stores, but if your model is well understood in your business/industry: relational databases are the way to go after finding product-market fit. Always understand the trade-offs (and a few intimate details) of any data store before you add to your company's stack!

    See more