StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Pouchdb vs SQLite

Pouchdb vs SQLite

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SQLite
SQLite
Stacks19.9K
Followers15.2K
Votes535
Pouchdb
Pouchdb
Stacks148
Followers242
Votes6
GitHub Stars17.5K
Forks1.5K

Pouchdb vs SQLite: What are the differences?

Introduction

PouchDB and SQLite are both databases that are commonly used for web and mobile applications. While they serve the same purpose of storing and managing data, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture and Platform: PouchDB is a client-side database that runs in the browser using JavaScript, while SQLite is a server-side database that runs on the server using SQL queries. PouchDB stores data in a JSON format, making it easy to work with in a web environment, while SQLite stores data in a relational database format, making it better suited for complex queries and data relationships.

  2. Offline Support: PouchDB is specifically designed for offline-first applications, enabling users to access and modify data even when they are not connected to the internet. It has built-in support for seamless synchronization with remote databases when the connection is restored. On the other hand, SQLite is primarily used in online applications and requires an internet connection to interact with the database.

  3. Scalability and Performance: PouchDB is more suitable for smaller applications as it operates within the limitations of the client's browser. It has a smaller storage capacity and may not perform as efficiently with large datasets or complex queries. SQLite, on the other hand, is designed for larger applications and can handle significant amounts of data and complex queries with high performance.

  4. Development and Deployment: PouchDB is easy to set up and integrate into web applications, requiring minimal configuration and dependencies. It is platform-independent, making it compatible with different operating systems and browsers. SQLite requires more setup and configuration, as it needs to be installed on the server and managed separately. It is primarily used in server-side development and requires knowledge of SQL query language.

  5. Data Persistency and Reliability: PouchDB is known for its replication capabilities, allowing data to be replicated across multiple devices and easily synced. It provides automatic conflict resolution, ensuring consistency in data across devices. SQLite, on the other hand, does not have built-in replication features and requires manual intervention or additional tools to synchronize data between devices.

  6. Community and Support: PouchDB has a robust open-source community with active contributions and support from developers worldwide. It has extensive documentation and frequent updates, making it easy to find resources and solutions to problems. SQLite also has a large community, but its focus is primarily on server-side development and SQL-related topics. It may have fewer resources available specifically for web and mobile development use cases.

In summary, PouchDB is a lightweight, browser-based, and offline-first database with seamless synchronization capabilities, while SQLite is a more robust server-side database designed for larger applications with complex queries and greater scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on SQLite, Pouchdb

Dimelo
Dimelo

Nov 5, 2020

Needs adviceonSQLiteSQLiteMySQLMySQLPostgreSQLPostgreSQL

I need to add a DBMS to my stack, but I don't know which. I'm tempted to learn SQLite since it would be useful to me with its focus on local access without concurrency. However, doing so feels like I would be defeating the purpose of trying to expand my skill set since it seems like most enterprise applications have the opposite requirements.

To be able to apply what I learn to more projects, what should I try to learn? MySQL? PostgreSQL? Something else? Is there a comfortable middle ground between high applicability and ease of use?

670k views670k
Comments
Stephen
Stephen

Senior DevOps Engineer at Vital Beats

Nov 9, 2020

Review

A question you might want to think about is "What kind of experience do I want to gain, by using a DBMS?". If your aim is to have experience with SQL and any related libraries and frameworks for your language of choice (python, I think?), then it kind of doesn't matter too much which you pick so much. As others have said, SQLite would offer you the ability to very easily get started, and would give you a reasonably standard (if a little basic) SQL dialect to work with.

If your aim is actually to have a bit of "operational" experience, in terms of things like what command line tools might be available as standard for the DBMS, understanding how the DBMS handles multiple databases, when to use multiple schemas vs multiple databases, some basic privilege management etc. Then I would recommend PostgreSQL. SQLite's simplicity actually avoids most of these experiences, which is not helpful to you if that is what you hope to learn. MySQL has a few "quirks" to how it manages things like multiple databases, which may lead you to making less good decisions if you tried to take your experience over to different DBMS, especially in bigger enterprise roles. PostgreSQL is kind of a happy middle ground here, with the ability to start PostgreSQL servers via docker or docker-compose making the actual day-to-day management pretty easy, while still giving you experience of the kinds of considerations I have listed above.

At Vital Beats we make use of PostgreSQL, largely because it offers us a happy balance between good management and backup of data, and good standard command line tools, which is essential for us where we are deploying our solutions within Kubernetes / docker, and so more graphical tools are not always appropriate for us. PostgreSQL is also pretty universally supported in terms of language libraries and frameworks, without having to make compromises on how we want to store and layout our data.

316k views316k
Comments
Jasmine
Jasmine

Feb 12, 2021

Decided

Backend:

  • Considering that our main app functionality involves data processing, we chose Python as the programming language because it offers many powerful math libraries for data-related tasks. We will use Flask for the server due to its good integration with Python. We will use a relational database because it has good performance and we are mostly dealing with CSV files that have a fixed structure. We originally chose SQLite, but after realizing the limitations of file-based databases, we decided to switch to PostgreSQL, which has better compatibility with our hosting service, Heroku.
175k views175k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

SQLite
SQLite
Pouchdb
Pouchdb

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

PouchDB enables applications to store data locally while offline, then synchronize it with CouchDB and compatible servers when the application is back online, keeping the user's data in sync no matter where they next login.

-
Cross browser compatibility; Lightweight; Easy to learn; Open source
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
17.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
19.9K
Stacks
148
Followers
15.2K
Followers
242
Votes
535
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 163
    Lightweight
  • 135
    Portable
  • 122
    Simple
  • 81
    Sql
  • 29
    Preinstalled on iOS and Android
Cons
  • 2
    Not for multi-process of multithreaded apps
  • 1
    Needs different binaries for each platform
Pros
  • 2
    Offline cache
  • 1
    Repication
  • 1
    Free
  • 1
    Very fast
  • 1
    JSON

What are some alternatives to SQLite, Pouchdb?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase