StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. State Management Library
  5. Preact vs Redux.js

Preact vs Redux.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Redux
Redux
Stacks32.0K
Followers23.6K
Votes674
Preact
Preact
Stacks1.1K
Followers292
Votes28

Preact vs Redux.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Preact and Redux.js are both popular tools used in web development. While Preact is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces, Redux.js is a predictable state container for JavaScript apps. While they both serve different purposes, there are key differences between them that distinguish their functionalities and usage.

  1. Architecture and Purpose: Preact focuses on providing a fast and lightweight alternative to React, providing a smaller footprint while maintaining React's core functionality. It is suitable for small to medium-sized applications where performance and size are crucial. On the other hand, Redux.js is designed to manage the state of the application and provide a predictable way to update and access the state across different components. It is commonly used in larger applications that require complex state management.

  2. State Management: Preact has its own built-in state management system, allowing components to have their own local state. It follows the traditional React approach of component-based state management. Redux.js, on the other hand, implements a global state tree, where the state of the entire application is stored in a centralized store. Components can access and modify the state using actions and reducers, providing a more predictable and maintainable way of managing state.

  3. Size: Preact is significantly smaller in size compared to Redux.js. Since Preact is a library focusing on just the view layer, it has a smaller footprint and can be easily added to existing projects. Redux.js, being a state management library, has a larger bundle size due to the additional functionality it provides for managing application state.

  4. Learning Curve: Preact has a relatively smaller learning curve for developers familiar with React. It has a similar API to React, making it easier for React developers to transition to Preact. Redux.js, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its concepts like actions, reducers, and the Redux store. It requires a good understanding of functional programming and state management principles.

  5. Compatibility and Ecosystem: Preact is designed to be highly compatible with existing React applications. It can work with most React libraries and tools without any major modifications. Redux.js has a rich ecosystem of middleware, devtools, and extensions that enhance its functionality. It has a large community and extensive documentation, making it easier to find support and resources.

  6. Use Case: Preact is ideal for lightweight applications and progressive web apps that prioritize performance and size. It is a good choice when the application needs a smaller bundle size or when migrating existing React applications to a smaller alternative. Redux.js is suitable for applications with complex state management requirements and scalable architectures. It is often used in larger applications with hundreds or thousands of components and a need for centralized state management.

In summary, Preact and Redux.js differ in their architecture, purpose, state management approach, size, learning curve, compatibility, and use case. Preact focuses on providing a smaller alternative to React with a lightweight footprint, perfect for smaller applications, while Redux.js specializes in managing application state, making it suitable for larger and complex projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Redux, Preact

Damiano
Damiano

Oct 27, 2019

Decided

Preact offers an API which is extremely similar to React's for less than 10% of its size (and createElement is renamed to h, which makes the overall bundle a lot smaller). Although it is less compatible with other libraries than the latter (and its ecosystem is nowhere as developed), this is generally not a problem as Preact exposes the preact/compat API, which can be used as an alias both for React and ReactDOM and allows for the use of libraries which would otherwise just be compatible with React.

25.6k views25.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Redux
Redux
Preact
Preact

It helps you write applications that behave consistently, run in different environments (client, server, and native), and are easy to test. t provides a great experience, such as live code editing combined with a time traveling debugger.

Preact is an attempt to recreate the core value proposition of React (or similar libraries like Mithril) using as little code as possible, with first-class support for ES2015. Currently the library is around 3kb (minified & gzipped).

Predictable state; Easy testing; Works with other view layers besides React
-
Statistics
Stacks
32.0K
Stacks
1.1K
Followers
23.6K
Followers
292
Votes
674
Votes
28
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 191
    State is predictable
  • 150
    Plays well with React and others
  • 126
    State stored in a single object tree
  • 79
    Hot reloading out of the box
  • 74
    Allows for time travel
Cons
  • 13
    Lots of boilerplate
  • 6
    Verbose
  • 5
    Design
  • 5
    Steep learning curve
  • 4
    Steeper learning curve than RxJs
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 5
    Drop-in replacement for React
  • 4
    Performance
  • 3
    Props/state passed to render
  • 1
    ES6 class components
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
React
React

What are some alternatives to Redux, Preact?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

MobX

MobX

MobX is a battle tested library that makes state management simple and scalable by transparently applying functional reactive programming (TFRP). React and MobX together are a powerful combination. React renders the application state by providing mechanisms to translate it into a tree of renderable components. MobX provides the mechanism to store and update the application state that React then uses.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase