StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. PrimeFaces vs React

PrimeFaces vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
PrimeFaces
PrimeFaces
Stacks111
Followers190
Votes4

PrimeFaces vs React: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Data Binding: PrimeFaces is a Java-based UI component framework that allows developers to bind data from model beans to the user interface components without writing extensive code. On the other hand, React is a JavaScript library that uses a virtual DOM and provides a unidirectional data flow, allowing developers to efficiently update and render components by manipulating the application state.

  2. 2. Performance: PrimeFaces is server-side rendering framework, which means that the server generates the HTML code and sends it to the client. React, on the other hand, is a client-side rendering framework that renders components on the client's browser. This difference in rendering approach can impact the performance of the application, as React can provide a faster and more responsive user interface.

  3. 3. Component Reusability: PrimeFaces provides a rich set of UI components that can be easily integrated into Java-based web applications, offering a high level of reusability. React, on the other hand, focuses on building reusable UI components using JavaScript, allowing developers to create modular and maintainable code.

  4. 4. Rendering Approach: PrimeFaces uses JSF (JavaServer Faces) as its underlying technology, which follows a server-side rendering approach. This means that the entire UI is rendered on the server and then sent to the client. React, on the other hand, uses a client-side rendering approach, where the UI component tree is built and updated on the client's browser.

  5. 5. Learning Curve: PrimeFaces requires knowledge of Java and JSF, making it suitable for Java developers who are already familiar with the technology stack. React, on the other hand, requires knowledge of JavaScript and its ecosystem, which may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to JavaScript.

  6. 6. Ecosystem and Community: PrimeFaces has a mature and active community, with a wide range of documentation, tutorials, and resources available for developers. React, on the other hand, is backed by Facebook, which has a large and vibrant developer community and a vast ecosystem of libraries and tools that can be leveraged to build React applications.

In Summary, PrimeFaces is a Java-based UI component framework with server-side rendering, while React is a JavaScript library with client-side rendering, offering differences in data binding, performance, component reusability, rendering approach, learning curve, and ecosystem/community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, PrimeFaces

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
PrimeFaces
PrimeFaces

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

It is a popular open source framework for JavaServer Faces featuring over 100 components, touch optimized mobilekit, client side validation, theme engine and more.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Touch optimized; Client side validation
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
111
Followers
147.0K
Followers
190
Votes
4.1K
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 2
    JEE Integration
  • 1
    Support Contract available
  • 1
    Nice Components
Cons
  • 1
    JSF
  • 1
    Some components have to be bought
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
Spring Boot
Spring Boot

What are some alternatives to React, PrimeFaces?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase