StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtualization Platform
  5. Proxmox VE vs VMware vSphere

Proxmox VE vs VMware vSphere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Stacks608
Followers550
Votes30
Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE
Stacks352
Followers334
Votes41

Proxmox VE vs VMware vSphere: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Proxmox VE and VMware vSphere are two popular virtualization platforms used by hosting providers and IT departments to create and manage virtualized environments. Although they share similarities in terms of virtualization features, there are key differences that set them apart.

1. Ease of Use: Proxmox VE offers a user-friendly web interface, making it easy for administrators to manage virtual machines, storage, and networking. On the other hand, VMware vSphere provides a robust and feature-rich interface, but it has a steeper learning curve compared to Proxmox VE.

2. Cost: Proxmox VE is an open-source solution and is available free of charge. It offers a comprehensive set of features without any licensing fees. On the contrary, VMware vSphere is a commercial product that requires purchasing licenses for advanced features, which can increase the overall cost significantly.

3. Scalability: Proxmox VE supports clustering, allowing administrators to create high availability setups with shared storage. It also has a built-in feature for live migration of virtual machines between hosts. VMware vSphere excels in terms of scalability, offering advanced features like vMotion for live migration, Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS), and High Availability (HA), making it the preferred choice for large-scale virtualization environments.

4. Hypervisor Support: Proxmox VE uses the open-source Linux-based KVM hypervisor as its default virtualization technology. It also supports container virtualization using LXC. On the other hand, VMware vSphere utilizes its proprietary ESXi hypervisor, which is known for its performance, stability, and robustness. VMware vSphere is also compatible with a wide range of guest operating systems.

5. Integration with Cloud Services: Proxmox VE integrates well with various cloud storage providers, allowing users to easily back up and restore virtual machines to cloud storage. It also provides built-in features for creating and managing containerized applications. While VMware vSphere offers integration with VMware's own cloud platform, it may require additional configurations and licensing to fully utilize cloud services.

6. Vendor Support: Proxmox VE provides community-based support through forums and online resources, as well as commercial support options for enterprise customers. VMware vSphere, being a commercial product, offers comprehensive technical support with direct access to VMware's support engineers. However, this level of support typically comes at an additional cost.

In summary, Proxmox VE offers a user-friendly interface, is cost-effective as an open-source solution, supports clustering and live migration, and is compatible with multiple hypervisors. On the other hand, VMware vSphere boasts advanced scalability features, a proprietary hypervisor, integration with VMware cloud services, and comprehensive vendor support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

Powerful Server Virtualization;Network Services;Efficient Storage;Consistent Automation;High Availability;Robust Security
-
Statistics
Stacks
608
Stacks
352
Followers
550
Followers
334
Votes
30
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Strong host isolation
  • 6
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Great VM management (HA,FT,...)
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Great Networking
Cons
  • 9
    Price
Pros
  • 9
    HA VM & LXC devices
  • 8
    Ease of use
  • 7
    Robust architecture
  • 6
    Avoid vendor lock-in
  • 6
    Free

What are some alternatives to VMware vSphere, Proxmox VE?

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Qemu

Qemu

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

VMware Fusion

VMware Fusion

It gives Mac users the power to run Windows on Mac along with hundreds of other operating systems side by side with Mac applications, without rebooting. It is simple enough for home users and powerful enough for IT professionals, developers and businesses.

Xen

Xen

It is a hypervisor using a microkernel design, providing services that allow multiple computer operating systems to execute on the same computer hardware concurrently. It was developed by the Linux Foundation and is supported by Intel.

VMware vSAN

VMware vSAN

It is enterprise-class, storage virtualization software that, when combined with vSphere, allows you to manage compute and storage with a single platform. You can reduce the cost and complexity of traditional storage and take the easiest path to hyperconverged infrastructure and hybrid cloud. Evolve to an integrated hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution with vSAN to improve business agility, all while speeding operations and lowering costs.

Oracle VM Server

Oracle VM Server

It is a zero license cost server virtualization and management solution that makes enterprise applications easier to deploy, manage, and support. Backed worldwide by affordable enterprise-quality support for both Oracle and non-Oracle environments, it reduces operations and support costs while increasing IT efficiency and agility.

Virtuozzo

Virtuozzo

It is an operating system-level server virtualization solution designed to centralize server management and consolidate workloads, which reduces overhead by reducing the number of physical servers required. Organizations use it for server consolidation, disaster recovery, and server workload agility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana