Pug vs Sass

Overview

Sass

Stacks44.8K

Followers32.2K

Votes3.0K

GitHub Stars15.3K

Forks2.2K

Pug

Stacks1.3K

Followers1.2K

Votes467

Pug vs Sass: What are the differences?

1. Syntax Difference: Pug, formerly known as Jade, is a templating engine that uses indentation-based syntax, similar to Python, whereas Sass is a stylesheet language that introduces new syntax elements like nesting, variables, mixins, and more, making it easier to write and manage CSS code efficiently.
2. File Extension Difference: Pug files have a ".pug" extension, while Sass files have a ".sass" or ".scss" extension. Pug files are used to create HTML templates, while Sass files are used to create CSS stylesheets.
3. Primary Purpose Difference: Pug is mainly used for generating dynamic HTML content, as it allows for the creation of reusable components and layouts. On the other hand, Sass is primarily used for enhancing the productivity of CSS development by adding features like variables, mixins, and functions to make the code more maintainable and reusable.
4. Output Difference: Pug compiles into HTML, which is rendered by the web browser, while Sass compiles into CSS, which is interpreted by the browser to determine the styling of HTML elements.
5. Code Structure Difference: Pug uses indentation for defining the structure of the HTML document, which enhances readability and reduces the amount of code needed. Sass implements nesting, allowing for hierarchical organization of styles, making it easier to manage and modify CSS properties.
6. Compatibility Difference: Pug requires a template engine or runtime compiler like JavaScript to interpret and render the code, which means it is not directly compatible with web browsers. On the other hand, Sass can be directly interpreted by web browsers, as it compiles into standard CSS code.

In summary, Pug is a templating engine used for generating dynamic HTML, with indentation-based syntax, while Sass is a stylesheet language that introduces new syntax elements like nesting and variables, enhancing the productivity of CSS development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Sass, Pug

Anonymous

CEO at ME!

Jun 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Sass

Stylus

PostCSS

Originally, I was going to start using @{Sass}|tool:1171| with Parcel, but then I learned about @{Stylus}|tool:1172|, which looked interesting because it can get the property values of something directly instead of through variables, and @{PostCSS}|tool:3339|, which looked interesting because you can customize your Pre/Post-processing. Which tool would you recommend?

547k views547k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sass	Pug
Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.	This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 15.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 44.8K	Stacks 1.3K
Followers 32.2K	Followers 1.2K
Votes 3.0K	Votes 467
Pros & Cons
Pros 613 Variables 594 Mixins 466 Nested rules 410 Maintainable 300 Functions Cons 6 Needs to be compiled	Pros 138 Elegant html 90 Great with nodejs 59 Very short syntax 59 Open source 54 Structured with indentation
Integrations
No integrations available	Node.js

What are some alternatives to Sass, Pug?

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Stylus

Stylus is a revolutionary new language, providing an efficient, dynamic, and expressive way to generate CSS. Supporting both an indented syntax and regular CSS style.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Slim Lang

Slim is a template language whose goal is to reduce the view syntax to the essential parts without becoming cryptic. It started as an exercise to see how much could be removed from a standard html template (<, >, closing tags, etc...). As more people took an interest in Slim, the functionality grew and so did the flexibility of the syntax.

PostCSS

PostCSS is a tool for transforming CSS with JS plugins. These plugins can support variables and mixins, transpile future CSS syntax, inline images, and more.

RactiveJS

Ractive was originally created at theguardian.com to produce news applications. Ractive takes your Mustache templates and transforms them into a lightweight representation of the DOM – then when your data changes, it intelligently updates the real DOM.

Bourbon

Bourbon is a library of pure sass mixins that are designed to be simple and easy to use. No configuration required. The mixins aim to be as vanilla as possible, meaning they should be as close to the original CSS syntax as possible.

EJS

It is a simple templating language that lets you generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. No religiousness about how to organize things. No reinvention of iteration and control-flow. It's just plain JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Pug vs Sass: What are the differences?

1. Syntax Difference: Pug, formerly known as Jade, is a templating engine that uses indentation-based syntax, similar to Python, whereas Sass is a stylesheet language that introduces new syntax elements like nesting, variables, mixins, and more, making it easier to write and manage CSS code efficiently.
2. File Extension Difference: Pug files have a ".pug" extension, while Sass files have a ".sass" or ".scss" extension. Pug files are used to create HTML templates, while Sass files are used to create CSS stylesheets.
3. Primary Purpose Difference: Pug is mainly used for generating dynamic HTML content, as it allows for the creation of reusable components and layouts. On the other hand, Sass is primarily used for enhancing the productivity of CSS development by adding features like variables, mixins, and functions to make the code more maintainable and reusable.
4. Output Difference: Pug compiles into HTML, which is rendered by the web browser, while Sass compiles into CSS, which is interpreted by the browser to determine the styling of HTML elements.
5. Code Structure Difference: Pug uses indentation for defining the structure of the HTML document, which enhances readability and reduces the amount of code needed. Sass implements nesting, allowing for hierarchical organization of styles, making it easier to manage and modify CSS properties.
6. Compatibility Difference: Pug requires a template engine or runtime compiler like JavaScript to interpret and render the code, which means it is not directly compatible with web browsers. On the other hand, Sass can be directly interpreted by web browsers, as it compiles into standard CSS code.

Pug vs Sass

Overview