StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. Pulse Secure vs Tink

Pulse Secure vs Tink

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pulse Secure
Pulse Secure
Stacks9
Followers15
Votes0
Tink
Tink
Stacks9
Followers8
Votes0

Pulse Secure vs Tink: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Licencing and Pricing: Pulse Secure typically offers its VPN solutions through a licensing model based on the number of concurrent users, while Tink provides its services through a usage-based pricing model, enabling customers to pay only for the resources they consume.
  2. Security Features: Pulse Secure emphasizes providing a comprehensive set of security features and compliance controls, including advanced encryption protocols and endpoint security, whereas Tink focuses on offering robust security measures, such as multi-factor authentication and client-side encryption, to ensure data protection.
  3. Integration Capabilities: Pulse Secure integrates seamlessly with a wide range of enterprise applications and services, facilitating interoperability within complex networking environments, whereas Tink prioritizes easy integration with popular cloud platforms and APIs to simplify deployment and management for users.
  4. Scalability and Performance: Pulse Secure is known for its high scalability, supporting thousands of concurrent users with minimal impact on performance, while Tink emphasizes optimizing performance for small to medium-sized businesses, focusing on efficiency and speed for a more streamlined user experience.
  5. Customer Support: Pulse Secure offers a dedicated support team and extensive documentation to assist customers with technical issues and troubleshooting, while Tink provides personalized support and guidance through its customer success program, ensuring a tailored and responsive customer service experience.
  6. Customization and Configuration: Pulse Secure allows for extensive customization and configuration options to meet specific user requirements and organizational needs, whereas Tink offers a user-friendly interface and simplified configuration settings for quick and easy deployment, catering to users with varying technical expertise.
In Summary, Pulse Secure and Tink differ in their licensing/pricing models, security features, integration capabilities, scalability/performance, customer support, and customization/configuration options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pulse Secure
Pulse Secure
Tink
Tink

Deliver easy, protected and available access to the data center and cloud with Pulse Secure products.

It is a multi-language, cross-platform, open source library that provides cryptographic APIs that are secure, easy to use correctly, and hard(er) to misuse.

Zero Trust, Secure Access Checklist; IoT Security Best Practices Guide
Multi-language; Cross-platform; Easy to use
Statistics
Stacks
9
Stacks
9
Followers
15
Followers
8
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Golang
Golang
Python
Python
Java
Java
Objective-C
Objective-C
C++
C++

What are some alternatives to Pulse Secure, Tink?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope