StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. React on Rails vs Webpack

React on Rails vs Webpack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K
React on Rails
React on Rails
Stacks25
Followers54
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.2K
Forks639

React on Rails vs Webpack: What are the differences?

<React on Rails and Webpack are crucial tools in modern web development, each serving distinct purposes. React on Rails integrates React.js with Ruby on Rails, enhancing the development experience for Rails developers. On the other hand, Webpack is a module bundler primarily used for bundling JavaScript files for usage in a browser. Below are key differences between React on Rails and Webpack.>

  1. Integration: React on Rails seamlessly integrates with Ruby on Rails, providing a smooth development experience for building interactive and dynamic user interfaces. In contrast, Webpack is a standalone tool used for bundling assets, including JavaScript, CSS, and more, enabling efficient management of dependencies and resources.

  2. Purpose: The primary purpose of React on Rails is to combine the capabilities of React.js with the robustness of Ruby on Rails, allowing developers to create sophisticated web applications. On the other hand, Webpack focuses on bundling, transforming, and managing assets to improve performance and optimize loading times for web applications.

  3. Configuration: React on Rails simplifies the configuration process by streamlining the setup for integrating React components within a Rails application. Webpack, on the other hand, requires more extensive configuration to define entry points, loaders, plugins, and other settings for bundling assets efficiently.

  4. Ease of Use: React on Rails caters to developers familiar with Ruby on Rails, offering a more straightforward approach to incorporating React components within the Rails ecosystem. In contrast, Webpack may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its comprehensive configuration options and advanced features.

  5. Dependencies: React on Rails has fewer dependencies as it primarily focuses on integrating React.js with Ruby on Rails, leveraging the functionalities of both platforms. Webpack, on the other hand, relies on various plugins and loaders to handle diverse asset types and optimize the bundling process effectively.

  6. Community Support: React on Rails benefits from the strong communities of both React.js and Ruby on Rails, providing ample resources, libraries, and support for developers. Webpack also has a vast community that continuously develops plugins, loaders, and tools to enhance the bundling and optimization process for web projects.

In Summary, React on Rails streamlines the integration of React.js with Ruby on Rails for efficient web development, while Webpack serves as a powerful bundling tool for managing assets and optimizing performance in web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Webpack, React on Rails

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Webpack
Webpack
React on Rails
React on Rails

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Project Objective: To provide an opinionated and optimal framework for integrating Ruby on Rails with React via the Webpacker gem. React on Rails integrates Facebook's React front-end framework with Rails. React v0.14.x and greater is supported, with server rendering. Redux and React-Router are supported as well, also with server rendering, using execJS.

Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
server-side rendering; turbolinks compatibility; redux support; react-router support; webpacker support; internationalization
Statistics
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Stars
5.2K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
639
Stacks
45.0K
Stacks
25
Followers
28.1K
Followers
54
Votes
752
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    Spaghetti-Code out of the box
  • 2
    Loader architecture is quite a mess (unreliable/buggy)
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Webpack, React on Rails?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot