StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. ReactiveUI vs StimulusReflex

ReactiveUI vs StimulusReflex

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ReactiveUI
ReactiveUI
Stacks10
Followers10
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.4K
Forks1.1K
StimulusReflex
StimulusReflex
Stacks11
Followers12
Votes8

StimulusReflex vs ReactiveUI: What are the differences?

StimulusReflex: Build modern, reactive, real-time apps with Ruby on Rails. It is an exciting new way to build modern, reactive, real-time apps with Ruby on Rails It eliminates the complexity imposed by full-stack frontend frameworks. And, it's fast.

It works seamlessly with the Rails tooling you already know and love.; ReactiveUI: An advanced, composable, functional reactive model-view-viewmodel framework for all .NET platforms. It is an advanced, composable, functional reactive model-view-viewmodel framework for all .NET platforms that is inspired by functional reactive programming. It allows you to abstract mutable state away from your user interfaces, express the idea around a feature in one readable place and improve the testability of your application.

StimulusReflex and ReactiveUI belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by StimulusReflex are:

  • Server-rendered HTML, delivered in miliseconds over the wire via Websockets
  • ERB templates and partials, with first-class ViewComponent support
  • Russian doll caching and ActiveJob

On the other hand, ReactiveUI provides the following key features:

  • Declarative
  • Composable
  • Cross-platform

ReactiveUI is an open source tool with 5.8K GitHub stars and 993 GitHub forks. Here's a link to ReactiveUI's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ReactiveUI
ReactiveUI
StimulusReflex
StimulusReflex

It is an advanced, composable, functional reactive model-view-viewmodel framework for all .NET platforms that is inspired by functional reactive programming. It allows you to abstract mutable state away from your user interfaces, express the idea around a feature in one readable place and improve the testability of your application.

It is an exciting new way to build modern, reactive, real-time apps with Ruby on Rails. It eliminates the complexity imposed by full-stack frontend frameworks. And, it's fast. It works seamlessly with the Rails tooling you already know and love.

Declarative; Composable; Cross-platform; Scalable & Testable; Open-source
Server-rendered HTML, delivered in miliseconds over the wire via Websockets; ERB templates and partials, with first-class ViewComponent support; Russian doll caching and ActiveJob; StimulusJS and Turbolinks; Built with CableReady, our secret power-move
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
10
Stacks
11
Followers
10
Followers
12
Votes
0
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Reactive stateless frontends
  • 2
    Deklarative - no Javascript
  • 2
    Most simple extension of the MVC model
  • 2
    Based on CableReady for dom diffing
Cons
  • 1
    Rails backend needed
Integrations
.NET
.NET
Rails
Rails

What are some alternatives to ReactiveUI, StimulusReflex?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase