Redux Dynamic Modules vs Zustand: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Redux Dynamic Modules and Zustand

In this section, we will explore the key differences between Redux Dynamic Modules and Zustand.

1. State Management Approach: Redux Dynamic Modules follows a centralized store approach where the application state is managed in a single global store. On the other hand, Zustand provides a decentralized store approach where each component can have its own local state. This allows for more granular control over state management and can be beneficial for smaller applications or components that require localized state.

2. Overhead and Boilerplate: Redux Dynamic Modules requires a significant amount of setup and boilerplate code in order to define actions, reducers, and selectors. It also requires additional packages like redux-thunk or redux-saga for handling side effects. Meanwhile, Zustand has a much simpler and lightweight API which reduces the amount of setup and boilerplate code required, making it easier and quicker to implement.

3. Immutability and State Updates: Redux Dynamic Modules follows an immutable data pattern, where state updates are performed by creating a new copy of the state. This can sometimes result in performance overhead, especially for large state objects. Zustand, on the other hand, provides a mutable state approach where state updates are performed directly, without creating copies. This can lead to better performance in certain scenarios.

4. Async Actions and Side Effects: Redux Dynamic Modules requires the use of additional middleware (e.g., redux-thunk or redux-saga) to handle asynchronous actions and side effects. This adds complexity and additional code to manage these asynchronous operations. Zustand, on the other hand, provides a built-in mechanism to handle async actions and side effects, eliminating the need for additional middleware.

5. Developer Experience and Learning Curve: Redux Dynamic Modules has a steeper learning curve due to its complex concepts and required setup. It also relies heavily on actions, reducers, and selectors, which can be more difficult to understand and maintain for developers new to Redux. Zustand has a simpler and more intuitive API, making it easier to learn and use, especially for developers who are new to state management.

6. Ecosystem and Community Support: Redux Dynamic Modules has a mature ecosystem and a large community of developers, which means there are many third-party libraries, tools, and resources available. Conversely, Zustand is a relatively new library with a smaller community, which means the ecosystem and community support are not as extensive as Redux. However, Zustand is gaining popularity and has a growing community.

In Summary, Redux Dynamic Modules and Zustand differ in their state management approach, overhead and boilerplate, immutability vs. mutability, handling of async actions, developer experience, and ecosystem/community support.