StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Concurrency Frameworks
  5. RxJS vs redux-saga

RxJS vs redux-saga

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RxJS
RxJS
Stacks4.4K
Followers638
Votes21
GitHub Stars19.4K
Forks2.1K
redux-saga
redux-saga
Stacks518
Followers348
Votes8
GitHub Stars22.5K
Forks2.0K

RxJS vs redux-saga: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between RxJS and redux-saga. Both RxJS and redux-saga are popular libraries used in JavaScript for managing asynchronous actions and state in applications. While they serve the same purpose, they differ in their approach and implementation.

  1. Integration: RxJS integrates directly with the application codebase, allowing developers to encapsulate asynchronous logic within the existing code. On the other hand, redux-saga acts as a middleware layer in Redux, providing a separate layer to handle side effects and asynchronous actions.

  2. Conceptual Approach: RxJS follows the reactive programming paradigm, which focuses on data streams and transformations using observable sequences. It provides a rich set of operators and allows developers to express complex asynchronous logic through a declarative approach. In contrast, redux-saga utilizes generator functions and provides a more imperative approach to managing side effects and asynchronous actions.

  3. Complexity: RxJS can be considered more complex to learn and understand, mainly due to its extensive set of operators, concepts like observables, and reactive programming concepts. Redux-saga, although it has its learning curve, offers a simpler and more sequential style of managing side effects.

  4. Debugging: Debugging RxJS code can be challenging as it involves manipulating streams of data and observing their transformations over time. Redux-saga, being based on generator functions, allows for easier debugging by stepping through the generator functions in a synchronous manner.

  5. Support for Time-based Operations: RxJS provides built-in support for handling time-based operations such as debouncing, throttling, and time windows. These capabilities make it suitable for scenarios like real-time data handling and event-driven applications. Redux-saga, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for time-based operations but can still be integrated with libraries like redux-saga-throttle-debounce for similar functionality.

  6. Compatibility: RxJS is a library that can be used independently in any JavaScript project, regardless of the framework or architecture. It can be used with or without Redux. In contrast, redux-saga is specifically designed for use with Redux and relies on its store and action concepts.

In summary, the key differences between RxJS and redux-saga lie in their integration approach, conceptual approach, complexity, debugging capabilities, support for time-based operations, and compatibility with different frameworks/architectures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

RxJS
RxJS
redux-saga
redux-saga

RxJS is a library for reactive programming using Observables, to make it easier to compose asynchronous or callback-based code. This project is a rewrite of Reactive-Extensions/RxJS with better performance, better modularity, better debuggable call stacks, while staying mostly backwards compatible, with some breaking changes that reduce the API surface.

An alternative side effect model for Redux apps

Statistics
GitHub Stars
19.4K
GitHub Stars
22.5K
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
4.4K
Stacks
518
Followers
638
Followers
348
Votes
21
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Easier async data chaining and combining
  • 3
    Steep learning curve, but offers predictable operations
  • 2
    Easier testing
  • 2
    Ability to build your own stream
  • 2
    Observable subjects
Cons
  • 3
    Steep learning curve
Pros
  • 7
    Easy to test
  • 1
    Easy to learn
Integrations
No integrations available
Redux
Redux
React
React

What are some alternatives to RxJS, redux-saga?

Redux

Redux

It helps you write applications that behave consistently, run in different environments (client, server, and native), and are easy to test. t provides a great experience, such as live code editing combined with a time traveling debugger.

MobX

MobX

MobX is a battle tested library that makes state management simple and scalable by transparently applying functional reactive programming (TFRP). React and MobX together are a powerful combination. React renders the application state by providing mechanisms to translate it into a tree of renderable components. MobX provides the mechanism to store and update the application state that React then uses.

Akka

Akka

Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.

Orleans

Orleans

Orleans is a framework that provides a straightforward approach to building distributed high-scale computing applications, without the need to learn and apply complex concurrency or other scaling patterns. It was created by Microsoft Research and designed for use in the cloud.

Zustand

Zustand

Small, fast and scaleable bearbones state-management solution. Has a comfy api based on hooks, that isn't boilerplatey or opinionated, but still just enough to be explicit and flux-like.

Effector

Effector

It is an effective multi-store state manager for Javascript apps, that allows you to manage data in complex applications.

Netty

Netty

Netty is a NIO client server framework which enables quick and easy development of network applications such as protocol servers and clients. It greatly simplifies and streamlines network programming such as TCP and UDP socket server.

Finagle

Finagle

Finagle is an extensible RPC system for the JVM, used to construct high-concurrency servers. Finagle implements uniform client and server APIs for several protocols, and is designed for high performance and concurrency.

vuex

vuex

Vuex is a state management pattern + library for Vue.js applications. It serves as a centralized store for all the components in an application, with rules ensuring that the state can only be mutated in a predictable fashion. It also integrates with Vue's official devtools extension to provide advanced features such as zero-config time-travel debugging and state snapshot export / import.

redux-thunk

redux-thunk

Redux Thunk middleware allows you to write action creators that return a function instead of an action. The thunk can be used to delay the dispatch of an action, or to dispatch only if a certain condition is met. The inner function receives the store methods dispatch and getState as parameters.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase