Rocket vs Spring

Overview

Spring

Stacks3.9K

Followers4.8K

Votes1.1K

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

Rocket

Stacks91

Followers176

Votes12

Rocket vs Spring: What are the differences?

Rocket and Spring are both popular frameworks used for developing web applications. Although they both serve the purpose of simplifying the development process, there are several key differences between them that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the main differences between Rocket and Spring.

Architecture: Rocket is a micro web framework written in Rust, while Spring is a full-fledged Java-based framework. Rocket follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, making it suitable for small to medium-sized applications. On the other hand, Spring provides a wide range of modules and is designed to handle enterprise-grade applications, offering features like dependency injection and aspect-oriented programming.
Language Compatibility: Rocket is designed specifically for the Rust programming language, making it the ideal choice for developers who prefer using Rust. Spring, on the other hand, is compatible with the Java programming language, but also supports other JVM languages like Kotlin and Groovy. This makes Spring more versatile in terms of language compatibility.
Community Support: Spring has been around for a longer time and has a larger community of developers compared to Rocket. This means that Spring has a vast ecosystem of libraries, plugins, and community support, making it easier to find solutions to issues and get assistance when needed. Rocket, although gaining popularity, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available.
Performance: Rocket, being built using the Rust programming language, offers excellent performance and low-level control over memory management. This makes Rocket a good choice for applications that require high performance and efficiency. Spring, being built on the Java Virtual Machine, may have a slightly lower performance compared to Rocket due to the overhead of the JVM.
Learning Curve: Rocket is known for its simplicity and ease of use, especially for developers familiar with Rust. The framework provides clear and concise APIs, making it relatively easy to learn and get started with. On the other hand, Spring has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and modules. It requires a good understanding of Java and its ecosystem, making it more suitable for experienced developers.
Integration: Spring provides seamless integration with other popular frameworks and technologies in the Java ecosystem, such as Hibernate for database access and the Spring Security framework for handling authentication and authorization. Rocket, being a lightweight framework, may require additional third-party libraries or custom implementations for integrating with other technologies.

In Summary, Rocket provides a lightweight and performant option for web development in Rust, while Spring offers a comprehensive and versatile framework for Java-based web applications with a larger community and extensive ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Spring, Rocket

Tushar

Jan 7, 2021

Needs adviceon

Spring

Spring Boot

Django

Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.

Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.

827k views827k

Comments

Anonymous

Dec 15, 2020

Needs adviceon

Spring

Java

Node.js

I am provided with the opportunity to learn one of these technologies during my training. I have prior experience with Spring and found it tough and still haven't figured out when to use what annotations among the thousands of annotations provided. On the other hand, I am very proficient in Java data structures and algorithms (custom comparators, etc.)

I have used Node.js and found it interesting, but I am wondering If I am taking the risk of choosing a framework that has a comparatively lesser scope in the future. One advantage I see with the node.js is the number of tutorials available and the ease with which I can code.

Please recommend which path to take. Is Spring learnable, or should I spend my energy on learning Node.js instead?

290k views290k

Comments

Kamrul

Aug 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

Django

Spring Boot

I am a graduate student working as a software engineer in a company. For my personal development, I want to learn web development. I have some experience in Springboot while I was in university. So I want to continue with spring-boot, but I heard about Django. I'm reaching out to the experts here to help me choose a future proof framework. Django or Spring Boot?

Thanks in Advance

502k views502k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring	Rocket
A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.	Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.
-	From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something; Boilerplate free; Easy to use; Extensible
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.1K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 38.8K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 3.9K	Stacks 91
Followers 4.8K	Followers 176
Votes 1.1K	Votes 12
Pros & Cons
Pros 230 Java 157 Open source 136 Great community 123 Very powerful 114 Enterprise Cons 15 Draws you into its own ecosystem and bloat 4 Poor documentation 3 Verbose configuration 3 Java 2 Java is more verbose language in compare to python	Pros 5 Easy to use 4 Uses all the rust features extensively 1 Django analog in rust 1 Provides nice abstractions 1 Inbuilt templating feature Cons 1 Only runs in nightly
Integrations
Java	Rust

What are some alternatives to Spring, Rocket?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Rocket vs Spring: What are the differences?

Architecture: Rocket is a micro web framework written in Rust, while Spring is a full-fledged Java-based framework. Rocket follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, making it suitable for small to medium-sized applications. On the other hand, Spring provides a wide range of modules and is designed to handle enterprise-grade applications, offering features like dependency injection and aspect-oriented programming.
Language Compatibility: Rocket is designed specifically for the Rust programming language, making it the ideal choice for developers who prefer using Rust. Spring, on the other hand, is compatible with the Java programming language, but also supports other JVM languages like Kotlin and Groovy. This makes Spring more versatile in terms of language compatibility.
Community Support: Spring has been around for a longer time and has a larger community of developers compared to Rocket. This means that Spring has a vast ecosystem of libraries, plugins, and community support, making it easier to find solutions to issues and get assistance when needed. Rocket, although gaining popularity, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available.
Performance: Rocket, being built using the Rust programming language, offers excellent performance and low-level control over memory management. This makes Rocket a good choice for applications that require high performance and efficiency. Spring, being built on the Java Virtual Machine, may have a slightly lower performance compared to Rocket due to the overhead of the JVM.
Learning Curve: Rocket is known for its simplicity and ease of use, especially for developers familiar with Rust. The framework provides clear and concise APIs, making it relatively easy to learn and get started with. On the other hand, Spring has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and modules. It requires a good understanding of Java and its ecosystem, making it more suitable for experienced developers.
Integration: Spring provides seamless integration with other popular frameworks and technologies in the Java ecosystem, such as Hibernate for database access and the Spring Security framework for handling authentication and authorization. Rocket, being a lightweight framework, may require additional third-party libraries or custom implementations for integrating with other technologies.

Rocket vs Spring

Overview