Rocket vs Tornado

Overview

Tornado

Stacks530

Followers409

Votes167

GitHub Stars22.3K

Forks5.5K

Rocket

Stacks91

Followers176

Votes12

Rocket vs Tornado: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of web frameworks, Rocket and Tornado stand out as popular choices for building web applications due to their distinct features and functionalities.

Programming Language: Rocket is written in Rust, a systems programming language known for its speed and memory safety, while Tornado is written in Python, a high-level language emphasizing readability and simplicity.
Concurrency Model: Rocket utilizes asynchronous programming through Rust's async/await syntax to handle multiple tasks concurrently, offering efficient performance for handling I/O-bound operations, whereas Tornado uses a single-threaded, non-blocking event loop to achieve concurrency in Python applications.
Community Support: Rocket has a smaller community compared to Tornado, which has a wider user base and extensive documentation, making it easier for developers to find resources, tutorials, and support when using the framework.
Code Flexibility: Rocket provides a more static typing system with compile-time guarantees, ensuring code correctness and safety, whereas Tornado offers dynamic typing in Python, allowing for quick prototyping and flexibility in development.
Websocket Support: Tornado has built-in support for WebSockets, enabling real-time communication between the client and server, whereas Rocket requires additional libraries or dependencies to handle WebSocket connections.
Performance: Rocket, being written in Rust, is known for its high performance and memory efficiency, making it suitable for server-side applications that require speed and scalability, whereas although Tornado is fast in handling asynchronous I/O operations, it may not be as performant as Rust-based frameworks in certain use cases.

In Summary, Rocket and Tornado differ in programming language, concurrency model, community support, code flexibility, WebSocket support, and performance characteristics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tornado	Rocket
By using non-blocking network I/O, Tornado can scale to tens of thousands of open connections, making it ideal for long polling, WebSockets, and other applications that require a long-lived connection to each user.	Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.
-	From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something; Boilerplate free; Easy to use; Extensible
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 5.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 530	Stacks 91
Followers 409	Followers 176
Votes 167	Votes 12
Pros & Cons
Pros 37 Open source 31 So fast 27 Great for microservices architecture 20 Websockets 17 Simple Cons 2 Event loop is complicated	Pros 5 Easy to use 4 Uses all the rust features extensively 1 Inbuilt templating feature 1 Provides nice abstractions 1 Django analog in rust Cons 1 Only runs in nightly
Integrations
Python	Rust

What are some alternatives to Tornado, Rocket?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Rocket vs Tornado: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of web frameworks, Rocket and Tornado stand out as popular choices for building web applications due to their distinct features and functionalities.

Programming Language: Rocket is written in Rust, a systems programming language known for its speed and memory safety, while Tornado is written in Python, a high-level language emphasizing readability and simplicity.
Concurrency Model: Rocket utilizes asynchronous programming through Rust's async/await syntax to handle multiple tasks concurrently, offering efficient performance for handling I/O-bound operations, whereas Tornado uses a single-threaded, non-blocking event loop to achieve concurrency in Python applications.
Community Support: Rocket has a smaller community compared to Tornado, which has a wider user base and extensive documentation, making it easier for developers to find resources, tutorials, and support when using the framework.
Code Flexibility: Rocket provides a more static typing system with compile-time guarantees, ensuring code correctness and safety, whereas Tornado offers dynamic typing in Python, allowing for quick prototyping and flexibility in development.
Websocket Support: Tornado has built-in support for WebSockets, enabling real-time communication between the client and server, whereas Rocket requires additional libraries or dependencies to handle WebSocket connections.
Performance: Rocket, being written in Rust, is known for its high performance and memory efficiency, making it suitable for server-side applications that require speed and scalability, whereas although Tornado is fast in handling asynchronous I/O operations, it may not be as performant as Rust-based frameworks in certain use cases.

In Summary, Rocket and Tornado differ in programming language, concurrency model, community support, code flexibility, WebSocket support, and performance characteristics.