StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Rome vs System.js

Rome vs System.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

System.js
System.js
Stacks28
Followers10
Votes2
GitHub Stars13.1K
Forks1.1K
Rome
Rome
Stacks26
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars23.6K
Forks650

System.js vs Rome : What are the differences?

Developers describe System.js as "Dynamic ES module loader". It is a Universal Module Loader for JavaScript. If you've used RequireJs or a CommonJs bundler in the past, you have probably created modules.Configurable module loader enabling dynamic ES module workflows in browsers and NodeJS. On the other hand, **Rome ** is detailed as "All in one JS toolchain (By Facebook)". It is an experimental JavaScript toolchain. It includes a compiler, linter, formatter, bundler, testing framework and more. It aims to be a comprehensive tool for anything related to the processing of JavaScript source code.

System.js and Rome are primarily classified as "JS Build Tools / JS Task Runners" and "Javascript Utilities & Libraries" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by System.js are:

  • Compatibility with Webpack
  • Polyfills for Older Browsers
  • Loader Extensions

On the other hand, Rome provides the following key features:

  • Open Source
  • Compiler
  • Linter

System.js and Rome are both open source tools. It seems that System.js with 10.5K GitHub stars and 941 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Rome with 7.96K GitHub stars and 254 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on System.js, Rome

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

System.js
System.js
Rome
Rome

It is a Universal Module Loader for JavaScript. If you've used RequireJs or a CommonJs bundler in the past, you have probably created modules.Configurable module loader enabling dynamic ES module workflows in browsers and NodeJS.

It is an experimental JavaScript toolchain. It includes a compiler, linter, formatter, bundler, testing framework and more. It aims to be a comprehensive tool for anything related to the processing of JavaScript source code.

Compatibility with Webpack;Polyfills for Older Browsers;Loader Extensions
Open Source; Compiler; Linter; Formatter; Bundler; Testing framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.1K
GitHub Stars
23.6K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
650
Stacks
28
Stacks
26
Followers
10
Followers
12
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Great plugin system
  • 1
    Loads anything trough AMD with the right plugin
No community feedback yet
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Node.js
Node.js
jQuery
jQuery
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to System.js, Rome ?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Webpack

Webpack

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Babel

Babel

Babel will turn your ES6+ code into ES5 friendly code, so you can start using it right now without waiting for browser support.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

rollup

rollup

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot