StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Tools For Text Editors
  5. Rust-analyzer vs Spacemacs

Rust-analyzer vs Spacemacs

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spacemacs
Spacemacs
Stacks189
Followers200
Votes86
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks4.9K
Rust-analyzer
Rust-analyzer
Stacks64
Followers49
Votes0

Rust-analyzer vs Spacemacs: What are the differences?

Introduction:
Rust-analyzer and Spacemacs are two popular tools among developers for code editing and development. Below are the key differences between them.

1. **Language Support**: Rust-analyzer is specifically designed for Rust programming language, providing advanced type inference and error checking for Rust code. On the other hand, Spacemacs is a versatile text editor that supports multiple programming languages through various plugins and configurations.
2. **User Interface**: Rust-analyzer comes with a clean and minimalistic user interface optimized for Rust developers, offering tailored features and tools for efficient coding. Spacemacs, known for its powerful and customizable interface, provides a plethora of features and shortcuts for developers across different languages, which can be overwhelming for beginners.
3. **Integration**: Rust-analyzer seamlessly integrates with popular Rust development tools and build systems, enhancing the workflow and productivity for Rust programmers. Spacemacs, being an Emacs distribution, allows deep integration with various tools, frameworks, and utilities, providing a comprehensive development environment for a wide range of languages.
4. **Performance**: Rust-analyzer is known for its blazing fast performance, offering quick code analysis, autocomplete, and navigation for large Rust projects, ensuring responsive and efficient coding experience. Spacemacs, being an Emacs-based editor, may face performance issues with extensive plugins and packages, especially on low-spec systems.
5. **Learning Curve**: Rust-analyzer, being focused on one language, has a relatively lower learning curve for Rust developers, offering a simplified and Rust-specific development environment. On the contrary, Spacemacs has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features, configuration options, and interactions with Emacs, requiring time and effort to master.
6. **Community Support**: Rust-analyzer has a growing community of Rust developers and enthusiasts actively contributing to its development, providing timely updates, bug fixes, and enhancements tailored for Rust ecosystem. Spacemacs, benefiting from the vast Emacs community, offers a rich repository of community-maintained packages, themes, and configurations for a diverse range of programming languages and workflows.

In Summary, Rust-analyzer and Spacemacs differ in language support, user interface design, integration capabilities, performance, learning curve, and community support, catering to distinct preferences and requirements of developers in their coding journey. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Spacemacs
Spacemacs
Rust-analyzer
Rust-analyzer

Since version 0.101.0 and later Spacemacs totally abolishes the frontiers between Vim and Emacs. The user can now choose his/her preferred editing style and enjoy all the Spacemacs features. Even better, it is possible to dynamically switch between the two styles seamlessly which makes it possible for programmers with different styles to do seat pair programming using the same editor.

At its core, it is a library for semantic analysis of Rust code as it changes over time. It is a new "IDE backend" for the Rust programming language.

Batteries Included;Nice UI;Excellent ergonomics;Convenient and Mnemonic Key Bindings;Great Documentation
Compatible with any editor that supports LSP; Dedicated plugins for Vim, Emacs and VS Code; Syntax Highlighting; Punctuation-aware code completion
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
189
Stacks
64
Followers
200
Followers
49
Votes
86
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Advanced support for Vim key bindings
  • 12
    Discoverability
  • 10
    Never have to touch the mouse
  • 10
    Easy setup
  • 7
    Community-driven configuration
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Emacs
Emacs
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
Rust
Rust
Emacs
Emacs
Vim
Vim

What are some alternatives to Spacemacs, Rust-analyzer?

ReSharper

ReSharper

It is a popular developer productivity extension for Microsoft Visual Studio. It automates most of what can be automated in your coding routines. It finds compiler errors, runtime errors, redundancies, and code smells right as you type, suggesting intelligent corrections for them.

SpaceVim

SpaceVim

SpaceVim is a Modular configuration, a bundle of custom settings and plugins, for Vim. It got inspired by spacemacs.

Vim-Plug

Vim-Plug

A minimalist Vim plugin manager.

Kite

Kite

Your editor and web browser don't know anything about each other, which is why you end up continuously switching between them. Kite bridges that gap, bringing an internet-connected programming experience right alongside your editor.

GitSavvy

GitSavvy

Full git and GitHub integration with Sublime Text 3.

pathogen.vim

pathogen.vim

Manage your 'runtimepath' with ease. In practical terms, pathogen.vim makes it super easy to install plugins and runtime files in their own private directories.

GitHub Copilot

GitHub Copilot

It is an AI pair programmer that helps you write code faster and with less work. It draws context from comments and code, and suggests individual lines and whole functions instantly.

Atom-IDE

Atom-IDE

A collection of Atom UIs to support language services as part of Atom IDE, designed for use with packages built on top of atom-languageclient.

PostSharp

PostSharp

PostSharp enables developers to eradicate boilerplate by offloading repetitive work from humans to machines using aspects: special kinds of custom attributes that modify the behavior of code they are applied to.

Tabnine

Tabnine

Code Faster With Whole-Line & Full-Function Code Completions. Trusted by millions of developers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana