StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Selenium vs Squish

Selenium vs Squish

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K
Squish
Squish
Stacks1
Followers0
Votes0

Selenium vs Squish: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare and highlight the key differences between Selenium and Squish - two popular testing tools used for website automation. Both tools have their strengths and weaknesses, making it essential to understand their differences before choosing the right one for your project.

  1. Testing Frameworks: Selenium is an open-source testing framework that supports multiple programming languages such as Java, C#, and Python. On the other hand, Squish is a commercial testing framework that mainly focuses on GUI testing and supports scripting in languages like JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and Tcl.

  2. Platform Support: Selenium provides extensive platform support and can be used on multiple operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux. Additionally, Selenium supports various browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer. Conversely, Squish primarily focuses on supporting desktop application testing and has better platform support for Windows and Linux.

  3. Object Recognition: Selenium primarily relies on locating elements using locators like IDs, class names, XPath, or CSS selectors. Squish, on the other hand, offers an advanced object recognition system that allows testers to identify objects by their properties, appearance, and even textual content.

  4. Test Execution: Selenium executes tests directly in browsers, allowing it to precisely mimic user interactions. Squish, however, operates on a different level by using interprocess communication to communicate with the application under test. This approach allows Squish to control and monitor the application from the outside, making it well-suited for testing applications with complex interfaces.

  5. Support for Mobile Testing: Selenium provides support for mobile testing through its Selenium WebDriver and Appium, which allows testing on iOS and Android platforms. Squish, on the other hand, does not explicitly offer built-in support for mobile testing, focusing primarily on desktop application testing.

  6. Licensing and Cost: Selenium is an open-source tool released under the Apache License, making it free to use and modify. Squish, being a commercial tool, requires a licensing fee for its usage. The licensing cost for Squish can vary depending on factors like the number of users, applications, and platforms.

In summary, Selenium offers extensive platform support, an open-source nature, and excellent browser automation capabilities, making it a popular choice for web automation. On the other hand, Squish specializes in GUI testing, offers rich object recognition capabilities, and is suitable for complex applications, albeit at a commercial cost.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Selenium
Selenium
Squish
Squish

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Automated GUI Testing that works. Use Squish for the automation of your cross-platform GUI tests. Coco Code Coverage Tool: Analyze your Test Coverage

Statistics
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
8.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16.2K
Stacks
1
Followers
12.6K
Followers
0
Votes
527
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Selenium, Squish?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot