Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

SpaCy

215
291
+ 1
14
Stanza

7
30
+ 1
0
Add tool

SpaCy vs Stanza: What are the differences?

  1. Licensing: SpaCy and Stanza have different licensing models. SpaCy is released under the MIT license, which allows users to freely use, modify, and distribute the software. On the other hand, Stanza is released under the Apache 2.0 license, which also permits users to use, modify, and distribute the software, but it includes additional requirements such as giving credit to the original authors and including the license agreement.
  2. Language Support: Both SpaCy and Stanza support a wide range of languages. However, SpaCy initially focused on English language processing and has gradually added support for other languages. Stanza, on the other hand, is built with multilingual support in mind from the start, offering a larger number of languages out-of-the-box.
  3. Dependency Parsing: SpaCy and Stanza provide different approaches to dependency parsing. SpaCy uses a statistical model based on transition-based parsing algorithms, which are fast and accurate but can struggle with certain linguistic phenomena. Stanza, in contrast, uses a neural network-based method called graph-based parsing, which captures long-range dependencies and performs well on various languages and sentence structures.
  4. Pretrained Models: SpaCy and Stanza offer pretrained models for various NLP tasks. However, SpaCy's pretrained models are generally smaller in size and faster to load compared to Stanza's models. This makes SpaCy a good choice for cases where efficiency is crucial, while Stanza's larger models can be advantageous for tasks that require more advanced linguistic analysis.
  5. Integration with Other Libraries: SpaCy and Stanza provide different levels of integration with other libraries and frameworks. SpaCy has a more extensive ecosystem of compatible libraries, such as scikit-learn and TensorFlow, making it easier to integrate with existing machine learning workflows. Stanza, on the other hand, offers seamless integration with the PyTorch ecosystem, which can be beneficial for users already working with PyTorch-based models and frameworks.
  6. Extension and Customization: Both SpaCy and Stanza allow users to extend and customize their functionalities. However, SpaCy has a more mature and user-friendly API for creating custom components, pipelines, and annotations. Stanza, on the other hand, provides more flexibility in terms of customization by allowing users to define their own neural network architectures and training procedures.

In Summary, SpaCy and Stanza differ in their licensing models, language support, dependency parsing approaches, pretrained models, integration with other libraries, and extension/customization capabilities.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of SpaCy
Pros of Stanza
  • 12
    Speed
  • 2
    No vendor lock-in
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of SpaCy
    Cons of Stanza
    • 1
      Requires creating a training set and managing training
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is SpaCy?

      It is a library for advanced Natural Language Processing in Python and Cython. It's built on the very latest research, and was designed from day one to be used in real products. It comes with pre-trained statistical models and word vectors, and currently supports tokenization for 49+ languages.

      What is Stanza?

      It is a Python natural language analysis package. It contains tools, which can be used in a pipeline, to convert a string containing human language text into lists of sentences and words, to generate base forms of those words, their parts of speech and morphological features, to give a syntactic structure dependency parse, and to recognize named entities. The toolkit is designed to be parallel among more than 70 languages, using the Universal Dependencies formalism.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      Jobs that mention SpaCy and Stanza as a desired skillset
      What companies use SpaCy?
      What companies use Stanza?
      See which teams inside your own company are using SpaCy or Stanza.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with SpaCy?
      What tools integrate with Stanza?
      What are some alternatives to SpaCy and Stanza?
      NLTK
      It is a suite of libraries and programs for symbolic and statistical natural language processing for English written in the Python programming language.
      Gensim
      It is a Python library for topic modelling, document indexing and similarity retrieval with large corpora. Target audience is the natural language processing (NLP) and information retrieval (IR) community.
      Amazon Comprehend
      Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing (NLP) service that uses machine learning to discover insights from text. Amazon Comprehend provides Keyphrase Extraction, Sentiment Analysis, Entity Recognition, Topic Modeling, and Language Detection APIs so you can easily integrate natural language processing into your applications.
      TensorFlow
      TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.
      Flair
      Flair allows you to apply our state-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) models to your text, such as named entity recognition (NER), part-of-speech tagging (PoS), sense disambiguation and classification.
      See all alternatives