Spring Framework vs Tapestry

Overview

Spring Framework

Stacks6.5K

Followers886

Votes0

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

Tapestry

Stacks12

Followers11

Votes0

GitHub Stars128

Forks94

Spring Framework vs Tapestry: What are the differences?

Component Model: Spring Framework uses a traditional POJO-based development model where business logic is implemented in plain Java objects configured by XML or annotations. Tapestry, on the other hand, utilizes a component-oriented approach where reusable components with associated templates and logic are built and assembled, allowing for greater flexibility and reusability in web application development.
Inversion of Control (IoC): Spring Framework heavily relies on Inversion of Control (IoC) and Dependency Injection (DI) principles to manage component dependencies and object creation. Tapestry also employs IoC to a certain extent, but it focuses more on convention over configuration, where default behaviors are assumed unless configured explicitly, providing a simpler and more concise development experience.
Template Engine: Spring Framework does not have an integrated template engine and typically relies on third-party solutions like Thymeleaf or FreeMarker for view rendering. In contrast, Tapestry comes with its own powerful templating engine that allows developers to create dynamic web pages easily with its component-based architecture, reducing the need for additional dependencies.
Data Binding: Tapestry provides robust data binding capabilities out of the box, allowing developers to bind form fields directly to Java bean properties and handle data validation seamlessly. Spring Framework also supports data binding through its Spring MVC module, but Tapestry's data binding features are more integrated and streamlined, simplifying the development of form-based interactions in web applications.
Scalability: Spring Framework is known for its extensive ecosystem of libraries, tools, and integrations, making it suitable for building large-scale enterprise applications with complex requirements. Although Tapestry offers a powerful component-based model, it may have limitations in scalability and performance compared to Spring due to its more opinionated approach and smaller community support for enterprise-level solutions.
Learning Curve: Spring Framework has a steeper learning curve compared to Tapestry, especially for beginners or developers new to the framework. This is mainly due to the vast array of features and configurations available in Spring, which can be overwhelming for inexperienced users. In contrast, Tapestry's focus on simplicity and convention makes it easier to get started with, making it a preferred choice for rapid prototyping or smaller web applications.

In Summary, the key differences between Spring Framework and Tapestry lie in their component model, IoC implementation, template engine, data binding capabilities, scalability, and learning curve, with each framework offering unique advantages and considerations for web application development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Spring Framework, Tapestry

juan9222

Jul 25, 2020

Needs advice

Hi there, I'm deciding the technology to use in my project.

I need to build software that has:

Login
Register
Main View (access to a user account, News, General Info, Business hours, software, and parts section).
Account Preferences.
Web Shop for Parts (Support, Download Sections, Ticket System).

The most critical functionality is a WebSocket that connects between a car that sends real-time data through serial communication, and a server performs diagnosis on the car and sends the results back to the user.

616k views616k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Framework	Tapestry
It provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform. The framework's core features can be used by any Java application, but there are extensions for building web applications on top of the Java EE platform.	It is an open-source framework for creating dynamic, robust, highly scalable web applications in Java. It involves creating HTML templates using plain HTML, and adding a small java class for each.
Lightweight; Dependency Injection; Transaction Management	Pure Java and Polyglot; Convention over Configuration; Highly Productive; Scalable; Testable
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.1K	GitHub Stars 128
GitHub Forks 38.8K	GitHub Forks 94
Stacks 6.5K	Stacks 12
Followers 886	Followers 11
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
AngularJS MySQL NetBeans IDE Hibernate IntelliJ IDEA	Java JavaScript HTML5 Scala Groovy

What are some alternatives to Spring Framework, Tapestry?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Spring Framework vs Tapestry: What are the differences?

Component Model: Spring Framework uses a traditional POJO-based development model where business logic is implemented in plain Java objects configured by XML or annotations. Tapestry, on the other hand, utilizes a component-oriented approach where reusable components with associated templates and logic are built and assembled, allowing for greater flexibility and reusability in web application development.
Inversion of Control (IoC): Spring Framework heavily relies on Inversion of Control (IoC) and Dependency Injection (DI) principles to manage component dependencies and object creation. Tapestry also employs IoC to a certain extent, but it focuses more on convention over configuration, where default behaviors are assumed unless configured explicitly, providing a simpler and more concise development experience.
Template Engine: Spring Framework does not have an integrated template engine and typically relies on third-party solutions like Thymeleaf or FreeMarker for view rendering. In contrast, Tapestry comes with its own powerful templating engine that allows developers to create dynamic web pages easily with its component-based architecture, reducing the need for additional dependencies.
Data Binding: Tapestry provides robust data binding capabilities out of the box, allowing developers to bind form fields directly to Java bean properties and handle data validation seamlessly. Spring Framework also supports data binding through its Spring MVC module, but Tapestry's data binding features are more integrated and streamlined, simplifying the development of form-based interactions in web applications.
Scalability: Spring Framework is known for its extensive ecosystem of libraries, tools, and integrations, making it suitable for building large-scale enterprise applications with complex requirements. Although Tapestry offers a powerful component-based model, it may have limitations in scalability and performance compared to Spring due to its more opinionated approach and smaller community support for enterprise-level solutions.
Learning Curve: Spring Framework has a steeper learning curve compared to Tapestry, especially for beginners or developers new to the framework. This is mainly due to the vast array of features and configurations available in Spring, which can be overwhelming for inexperienced users. In contrast, Tapestry's focus on simplicity and convention makes it easier to get started with, making it a preferred choice for rapid prototyping or smaller web applications.

Spring Framework vs Tapestry

Overview