Spring MVC vs ZK

Overview

Stacks35

Followers48

Votes6

Spring MVC

Stacks479

Followers519

Votes0

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

Spring MVC vs ZK: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing Spring MVC to ZK, it's essential to understand the key differences between the two frameworks. Spring MVC is a popular web framework in the Java ecosystem, focusing on a model-view-controller architecture for building web applications. On the other hand, ZK is a Java web framework that emphasizes event-driven programming and provides a component-centric approach to web development.

Architecture: Spring MVC follows the traditional model-view-controller architecture, separating the application into three components: model, view, and controller. In contrast, ZK promotes an event-driven programming model where user interactions trigger events, leading to automatic updates on the client side without the need for manual DOM manipulation.
Component-based vs. Request-based: ZK is a component-based framework, where user interface components are reusable and encapsulate both behavior and presentation. In contrast, Spring MVC is request-based, focusing on handling HTTP requests and generating responses by mapping URLs to controller methods.
JavaScript Usage: ZK abstracts client-side JavaScript handling and allows developers to interact with components using Java on the server-side. In comparison, while Spring MVC can integrate with JavaScript libraries like jQuery, developers have more control over client-side scripting and behavior.
Rich Client-side Capabilities: ZK provides rich client-side capabilities out of the box, such as AJAX support, data binding, and client-server communication handling. Spring MVC, while capable of achieving similar functionality with additional libraries or tools, may require more manual configuration and setup.
Ease of Development: ZK's component-centric approach simplifies development by abstracting complex client-server interactions and providing a higher level of abstraction for UI components. In contrast, Spring MVC's flexibility allows for more customization, but developers may need to handle more low-level details related to request processing and handling.

In Summary, the key differences between Spring MVC and ZK lie in their architecture, programming model, client-side capabilities, and ease of development, with ZK emphasizing component-based development and rich client-side features, while Spring MVC offers more flexibility and control over the application flow and behavior.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

ZK	Spring MVC
It is renowned for "Ajax without JavaScript", enabling developers to build rich Web applications without any knowledge of Ajax and JavaScript. It is used for building enterprise web and mobile apps.	A Java framework that follows the Model-View-Controller design pattern and provides an elegant solution to use MVC in spring framework by the help of DispatcherServlet.
jQuery, Spring, JPA, Hibernate, JavaEE, Grails, Scala	Clear separation of roles; Customizable binding and validation; Adaptability; Flexibility
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 59.1K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 38.8K
Stacks 35	Stacks 479
Followers 48	Followers 519
Votes 6	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Java 1 Example packages 1 Open Source 1 Compatibility 1 Components	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Scala Spring Boot Spring Security jQuery Grails Java EE	AngularJS Bootstrap Spring Boot Hibernate

What are some alternatives to ZK, Spring MVC?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Spring MVC vs ZK: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Architecture: Spring MVC follows the traditional model-view-controller architecture, separating the application into three components: model, view, and controller. In contrast, ZK promotes an event-driven programming model where user interactions trigger events, leading to automatic updates on the client side without the need for manual DOM manipulation.
Component-based vs. Request-based: ZK is a component-based framework, where user interface components are reusable and encapsulate both behavior and presentation. In contrast, Spring MVC is request-based, focusing on handling HTTP requests and generating responses by mapping URLs to controller methods.
JavaScript Usage: ZK abstracts client-side JavaScript handling and allows developers to interact with components using Java on the server-side. In comparison, while Spring MVC can integrate with JavaScript libraries like jQuery, developers have more control over client-side scripting and behavior.
Rich Client-side Capabilities: ZK provides rich client-side capabilities out of the box, such as AJAX support, data binding, and client-server communication handling. Spring MVC, while capable of achieving similar functionality with additional libraries or tools, may require more manual configuration and setup.
Ease of Development: ZK's component-centric approach simplifies development by abstracting complex client-server interactions and providing a higher level of abstraction for UI components. In contrast, Spring MVC's flexibility allows for more customization, but developers may need to handle more low-level details related to request processing and handling.

Spring MVC vs ZK

Overview