StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Stimulus vs Vue.js

Stimulus vs Vue.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vue.js
Vue.js
Stacks55.5K
Followers44.7K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars209.7K
Forks33.8K
Stimulus
Stimulus
Stacks132
Followers106
Votes16

Stimulus vs Vue.js: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Stimulus and Vue.js are both JavaScript frameworks that are used for building user interfaces (UI) in web applications. While they have similarities, there are key differences between them that developers should consider when choosing which framework to use for their projects.

  1. Architecture and Scope: Stimulus is a lightweight framework that focuses on providing structure and interactivity to individual HTML elements on a page. It is designed to enhance server-rendered HTML and primarily targets traditional multi-page web applications. On the other hand, Vue.js is a full-featured framework that allows developers to build complex, single-page applications (SPAs) by providing tools for managing state, routing, and component-based UI development.

  2. Learning Curve and Complexity: Stimulus has a low learning curve and is easy to grasp for developers familiar with JavaScript and HTML. It follows a simple, declarative approach where you write HTML augmented with JavaScript code to manage behavior. Vue.js, while it also has a gentle learning curve, can be more complex due to its extensive feature set. It requires developers to understand concepts such as reactive data, components, and the Vue instance lifecycle.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: Stimulus has a smaller and less mature community compared to Vue.js. As a result, there are fewer resources, plugins, and third-party integrations available for Stimulus. Vue.js, on the other hand, has a large and active community, which translates into a rich ecosystem of libraries, tools, and plugins. This larger community also means that you are more likely to find community support and resources when using Vue.js.

  4. Performance and Scalability: Stimulus is designed to work efficiently without relying heavily on large JavaScript bundles. It is optimized for rendering and managing individual elements on a page. Vue.js, being a full-featured framework, brings additional complexity and a larger bundle size, which can affect initial page load times. However, Vue.js offers built-in optimizations and advanced techniques like lazy-loading components and asynchronous rendering to tackle performance issues and scale applications effectively.

  5. Reactivity Model: Stimulus does not provide a built-in reactivity system. Instead, it focuses on managing element states through JavaScript code. Whenever a state changes, developers must manually update the DOM elements to reflect those changes. In contrast, Vue.js offers a powerful reactivity system that automatically updates the DOM when the underlying data changes. This makes it easier to build reactive UIs and reduces the amount of manual DOM manipulation required.

  6. Browser Support: Stimulus works well in modern web browsers and has limited support for older browsers. Vue.js, being a more comprehensive framework, has broader browser compatibility due to its built-in polyfills and support for older JavaScript features. This wider compatibility can be an advantage for projects that need to target a wide range of browsers.

In summary, Stimulus is a lightweight and straightforward framework that focuses on individual element interactivity in traditional web applications. Vue.js, on the other hand, is a full-featured framework with a larger community, more extensive feature set, and better scalability for building complex single-page applications. The choice between the two depends on the project requirements, complexity, and the developer's familiarity with the framework.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Vue.js, Stimulus

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Simon
Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

DecidedonVuetifyVuetifyVue.jsVue.jsNuxt.jsNuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

  • @{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
  • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
  • @{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
  • @{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
  • @{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
  • @{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
  • @{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
  • @{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
  • @{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

  • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
  • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
  • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
  • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
  • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
  • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
5.13M views5.13M
Comments
Kamaleshwar
Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

It was easier to find people who've worked on React than Vue. Angular did not have this problem, but seemed way too bloated compared to React. Angular also brings in restrictions working within their MVC framework. React on the other hand only handles the view/rendering part and rest of the control is left to the developers. React has a very active community, support and has lots of ready-to-use plugins/libraries available.

683k views683k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Vue.js
Vue.js
Stimulus
Stimulus

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Stimulus is a JavaScript framework with modest ambitions. It doesn't seek to take over your entire front-end—in fact, it's not concerned with rendering HTML at all.

Reactivity; Components; Modularity; Animations; Routing; Stability; Extendable Data bindings; Plain JS object models; Build UI by composing components; Mix & matching small libraries
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
209.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
33.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
55.5K
Stacks
132
Followers
44.7K
Followers
106
Votes
1.6K
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 294
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 230
    Good documentation
  • 196
    Components
  • 131
    Simple the best
  • 100
    Simplified AngularJS
Cons
  • 9
    Less Common Place
  • 5
    YXMLvsHTML Markup
  • 3
    Don't support fragments
  • 3
    Only support programatically multiple root nodes
Pros
  • 5
    No Javascript on Backend
  • 5
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 4
    Balance between Front End and BackEnd
  • 2
    Easy way to add functionality to rails views
Cons
  • 2
    Steep learning curve
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Vue.js, Stimulus?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase