StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Tornado vs Twisted

Tornado vs Twisted

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Tornado
Tornado
Stacks530
Followers409
Votes167
GitHub Stars22.3K
Forks5.5K
Twisted
Twisted
Stacks77
Followers89
Votes10
GitHub Stars5.9K
Forks1.2K

Tornado vs Twisted: What are the differences?

Introduction

Tornado and Twisted are both asynchronous Python frameworks used for building scalable and high-performance web applications. Although they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Event Loop Model: Tornado uses a single-threaded, non-blocking event loop model, while Twisted uses a cooperative multitasking model with multiple event loops. Tornado's event loop is based on an asynchronous I/O core that allows concurrent requests without the need for multiple threads or processes. On the other hand, Twisted relies on cooperative multitasking, which allows tasks to yield control voluntarily, making it suitable for highly concurrent applications.

  2. Web Server Capabilities: Tornado comes with a built-in web server, making it easier to set up and deploy applications. It provides a high-performance HTTP server that can handle a large number of concurrent connections. In contrast, Twisted provides a more generic networking framework and does not have a built-in web server by default. To create a web server using Twisted, additional components need to be added, such as Twisted Web or Klein.

  3. Application Design: Tornado follows a request-handler model where each request is handled by a separate handler class. It offers a simple and elegant way to handle HTTP requests and supports the use of decorators and mixins to extend functionality. Twisted, on the other hand, follows a callback-based design pattern, where callbacks are used to handle events and asynchronous operations. It provides a flexible and customizable approach to building applications but may require more coding effort compared to Tornado.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Tornado is known for its exceptional scalability and performance, thanks to its non-blocking event loop model. It can handle a large number of connections efficiently, making it suitable for high-traffic applications. Twisted also offers good performance, but its cooperative multitasking model may introduce more overhead in certain scenarios, especially when handling thousands of simultaneous connections.

  5. Ease of Use: Tornado aims to provide a more straightforward and beginner-friendly experience. Its API is designed to be intuitive and includes many helpful features out of the box, such as template rendering and authentication support. Twisted, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and requires a deeper understanding of the underlying concepts. It provides more flexibility and control but may require more effort to get started compared to Tornado.

  6. Community and Support: Tornado and Twisted have active and supportive communities, but Twisted has been around for longer and has a more mature ecosystem. Twisted has a vast range of third-party libraries and plugins available, allowing developers to leverage existing solutions. Tornado also has a growing community, but it may require more custom development for specific requirements not covered by its core functionality.

In Summary, Tornado and Twisted differ in their event loop models, web server capabilities, application design approaches, scalability and performance, ease of use, and community support. Choosing between the two frameworks depends on the requirements and preferences of the project at hand.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tornado
Tornado
Twisted
Twisted

By using non-blocking network I/O, Tornado can scale to tens of thousands of open connections, making it ideal for long polling, WebSockets, and other applications that require a long-lived connection to each user.

Twisted is an event-driven networking engine written in Python and licensed under the open source ​MIT license. Twisted runs on Python 2 and an ever growing subset also works with Python 3. Twisted also supports many common network protocols, including SMTP, POP3, IMAP, SSHv2, and DNS.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.3K
GitHub Stars
5.9K
GitHub Forks
5.5K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
530
Stacks
77
Followers
409
Followers
89
Votes
167
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 37
    Open source
  • 31
    So fast
  • 27
    Great for microservices architecture
  • 20
    Websockets
  • 17
    Simple
Cons
  • 2
    Event loop is complicated
Pros
  • 5
    Easy-to-understand concurrency
  • 3
    Twisted prevails
  • 1
    Solid, flexible, powerful
  • 1
    It works
Integrations
Python
Python
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Tornado, Twisted?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase