Underscore vs Vue.js

Overview

Underscore

Stacks1.9K

Followers589

Votes290

GitHub Stars27.4K

Forks5.5K

Vue.js

Stacks55.5K

Followers44.7K

Votes1.6K

GitHub Stars209.7K

Forks33.8K

Underscore vs Vue.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Underscore and Vue.js are both JavaScript libraries that offer various utility functions and tools for web development. However, they serve different purposes and have distinct features that set them apart. In this comparison, we will highlight six key differences between Underscore and Vue.js.

DOM Manipulation: Underscore does not provide built-in capability for manipulating the DOM (Document Object Model). It focuses more on providing utility functions for data manipulation and functional programming. On the other hand, Vue.js is a progressive JavaScript framework that enables efficient and reactive DOM handling. Vue.js offers a declarative approach to handle the DOM, allowing developers to bind data to the HTML dynamically.
Reactivity: Vue.js stands out with its reactivity system called "Vue Reactive". It automatically tracks and updates the changes made to the data, ensuring that the DOM stays in sync. Underscore, on the other hand, does not have built-in reactivity support. Developers need to handle manual updates when data changes occur.
Component-Based Development: Vue.js is specifically designed for building web applications using a component-based architecture. It provides components that encapsulate HTML, CSS, and JavaScript logic together, making the application more modular and reusable. Underscore, on the other hand, does not have native support for component-based development.
Virtual DOM: Vue.js utilizes a virtual DOM (Document Object Model) to efficiently update and render components. This approach provides better performance by reducing unnecessary DOM operations. Underscore does not have a virtual DOM implementation and directly manipulates the actual DOM elements.
Two-Way Data Binding: Vue.js offers two-way data binding, which means any changes to the data automatically reflect in the UI and vice versa. This feature simplifies the synchronization between data and UI elements. On the other hand, Underscore does not provide built-in two-way data binding.
Directives: Vue.js introduces directives, which are special attributes used to manipulate the DOM and apply behaviors to elements. Directives, such as v-model and v-for, enable developers to easily add interactive functionality to the HTML elements. Underscore does not have a directive system.

In Summary, Vue.js is a comprehensive JavaScript framework that provides features like reactivity, component-based development, virtual DOM, two-way data binding, and directives. Underscore, on the other hand, focuses more on utility functions for data manipulation and functional programming and does not provide these features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Underscore, Vue.js

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceon

Vue.js

React

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k

Comments

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

Decidedon

Vuetify

Vue.js

Nuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

@{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
@{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
@{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
@{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
@{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
@{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
@{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
@{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.

5.13M views5.13M

Comments

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Underscore	Vue.js
A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.	It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.
-	Reactivity; Components; Modularity; Animations; Routing; Stability; Extendable Data bindings; Plain JS object models; Build UI by composing components; Mix & matching small libraries
Statistics
GitHub Stars 27.4K	GitHub Stars 209.7K
GitHub Forks 5.5K	GitHub Forks 33.8K
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 55.5K
Followers 589	Followers 44.7K
Votes 290	Votes 1.6K
Pros & Cons
Pros 85 Utility 55 Simple 40 Functional programming 32 Fast 28 Open source	Pros 294 Simple and easy to start with 230 Good documentation 196 Components 131 Simple the best 100 Simplified AngularJS Cons 9 Less Common Place 5 YXMLvsHTML Markup 3 Don't support fragments 3 Only support programatically multiple root nodes

What are some alternatives to Underscore, Vue.js?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Related Comparisons

Underscore vs Vue.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

DOM Manipulation: Underscore does not provide built-in capability for manipulating the DOM (Document Object Model). It focuses more on providing utility functions for data manipulation and functional programming. On the other hand, Vue.js is a progressive JavaScript framework that enables efficient and reactive DOM handling. Vue.js offers a declarative approach to handle the DOM, allowing developers to bind data to the HTML dynamically.
Reactivity: Vue.js stands out with its reactivity system called "Vue Reactive". It automatically tracks and updates the changes made to the data, ensuring that the DOM stays in sync. Underscore, on the other hand, does not have built-in reactivity support. Developers need to handle manual updates when data changes occur.
Component-Based Development: Vue.js is specifically designed for building web applications using a component-based architecture. It provides components that encapsulate HTML, CSS, and JavaScript logic together, making the application more modular and reusable. Underscore, on the other hand, does not have native support for component-based development.
Virtual DOM: Vue.js utilizes a virtual DOM (Document Object Model) to efficiently update and render components. This approach provides better performance by reducing unnecessary DOM operations. Underscore does not have a virtual DOM implementation and directly manipulates the actual DOM elements.
Two-Way Data Binding: Vue.js offers two-way data binding, which means any changes to the data automatically reflect in the UI and vice versa. This feature simplifies the synchronization between data and UI elements. On the other hand, Underscore does not provide built-in two-way data binding.
Directives: Vue.js introduces directives, which are special attributes used to manipulate the DOM and apply behaviors to elements. Directives, such as v-model and v-for, enable developers to easily add interactive functionality to the HTML elements. Underscore does not have a directive system.

Underscore vs Vue.js

Overview

Underscore vs Vue.js: What are the differences?