StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtualization Platform
  5. VMware Fusion vs VMware vSphere

VMware Fusion vs VMware vSphere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Stacks608
Followers550
Votes30
VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Stacks84
Followers70
Votes0

VMware Fusion vs VMware vSphere: What are the differences?

Introduction

This article provides a comparison between VMware Fusion and VMware vSphere, highlighting the key differences between the two virtualization platforms.

  1. Installation and Usage: VMware Fusion is designed for individual Mac users who want to run virtual machines on their macOS devices. It allows users to create and run multiple virtual machines directly on their Mac computers. On the other hand, VMware vSphere is a comprehensive virtualization and cloud computing platform that is primarily used by businesses and organizations. It enables the creation and management of virtual infrastructures across multiple physical servers.

  2. Scalability: While VMware Fusion is limited to running virtual machines on a single macOS device, VMware vSphere offers much greater scalability. It allows for the creation of large-scale virtual infrastructures that can span multiple physical servers, providing organizations with the flexibility to scale their resources as needed.

  3. Management Features: VMware Fusion provides a user-friendly interface for managing virtual machines on a Mac computer. It offers features such as snapshotting, which allows users to save a virtual machine's state at a particular point in time. In contrast, VMware vSphere provides advanced management features like high availability, distributed resource scheduling, and live migration, which are essential for managing large-scale virtual infrastructures in an enterprise environment.

  4. Networking Capabilities: VMware Fusion offers basic networking capabilities, allowing users to connect their virtual machines to the host's network. VMware vSphere, on the other hand, provides advanced networking features like virtual switches, VLANs, and distributed switches, enabling organizations to build complex network topologies within their virtual infrastructures.

  5. Hardware Support: VMware Fusion is designed to run on Mac hardware and supports running a wide range of operating systems as guest virtual machines. VMware vSphere, on the other hand, is hardware-agnostic and can be installed on various server hardware platforms. It supports running multiple operating systems as guest virtual machines, providing flexibility for organizations with diverse hardware requirements.

  6. Availability and Pricing: VMware Fusion is available as a standalone product and can be purchased with a one-time license fee. It offers different editions with varying features and pricing options. On the other hand, VMware vSphere is available as a suite of products with different licensing and pricing models. It offers different editions tailored for different business needs, such as vSphere Standard, Advanced, Enterprise, and Enterprise Plus.

In summary, VMware Fusion is a virtualization platform for individual Mac users, offering basic virtual machine management features. VMware vSphere, on the other hand, is a comprehensive virtualization and cloud computing platform for businesses, providing advanced management and scalability features for large-scale virtual infrastructures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

It gives Mac users the power to run Windows on Mac along with hundreds of other operating systems side by side with Mac applications, without rebooting. It is simple enough for home users and powerful enough for IT professionals, developers and businesses.

Powerful Server Virtualization;Network Services;Efficient Storage;Consistent Automation;High Availability;Robust Security
-
Statistics
Stacks
608
Stacks
84
Followers
550
Followers
70
Votes
30
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Strong host isolation
  • 6
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Great VM management (HA,FT,...)
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Feature rich
Cons
  • 9
    Price
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to VMware vSphere, VMware Fusion?

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Qemu

Qemu

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

Xen

Xen

It is a hypervisor using a microkernel design, providing services that allow multiple computer operating systems to execute on the same computer hardware concurrently. It was developed by the Linux Foundation and is supported by Intel.

VMware vSAN

VMware vSAN

It is enterprise-class, storage virtualization software that, when combined with vSphere, allows you to manage compute and storage with a single platform. You can reduce the cost and complexity of traditional storage and take the easiest path to hyperconverged infrastructure and hybrid cloud. Evolve to an integrated hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution with vSAN to improve business agility, all while speeding operations and lowering costs.

Oracle VM Server

Oracle VM Server

It is a zero license cost server virtualization and management solution that makes enterprise applications easier to deploy, manage, and support. Backed worldwide by affordable enterprise-quality support for both Oracle and non-Oracle environments, it reduces operations and support costs while increasing IT efficiency and agility.

Virtuozzo

Virtuozzo

It is an operating system-level server virtualization solution designed to centralize server management and consolidate workloads, which reduces overhead by reducing the number of physical servers required. Organizations use it for server consolidation, disaster recovery, and server workload agility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana