StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Vue.js vs vue-next

Vue.js vs vue-next

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vue.js
Vue.js
Stacks55.5K
Followers44.7K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars209.7K
Forks33.8K
vue-next
vue-next
Stacks12
Followers14
Votes0

Vue.js vs vue-next: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Vue.js and vue-next

Vue.js and vue-next are both JavaScript frameworks used for building user interfaces. They share many similarities but also have key differences that set them apart.

  1. Composition API: One of the major differences between Vue.js and vue-next is the introduction of the Composition API in vue-next. This new API allows developers to organize and reuse logic in a more flexible and modular way. It provides a more granular approach to creating components by allowing logic to be encapsulated in functions that can be easily reused and composed.

  2. Reactivity: Vue.js uses Object.defineProperty to achieve reactivity, which may have performance limitations. On the other hand, vue-next introduces a new reactivity system called the Proxy-based Reactivity. This new system provides better performance by using JavaScript Proxies instead of getter and setter functions.

  3. Smaller Size: Vue.js is already known for its small size compared to other frameworks like Angular or React. However, vue-next takes it even further and reduces the bundle size by leveraging tree shaking and improved compiler options. This makes vue-next more lightweight and faster to load.

  4. Faster Updates: Vue-next offers more efficient updates compared to Vue.js. It achieves this by optimizing the re-rendering mechanism and reducing unnecessary re-renders. This leads to improved overall performance and better user experience, especially in complex applications.

  5. Hooks-like Functions: Vue-next introduces hooks-like functions as part of the Composition API. Similar to React hooks, these functions provide a way to manage state and lifecycle in functional components, allowing developers to write more concise and reusable code.

  6. Transition Enhancements: While Vue.js already provides a powerful transition system, vue-next enhances it further by adding support for more advanced animations and transitions. It introduces new features like improved transition groups, dynamic transitions, and transition modes, providing more flexibility when working with animations.

In summary, vue-next introduces the Composition API, improves reactivity, reduces bundle size, offers faster updates, introduces hooks-like functions, and enhances the transition system compared to Vue.js. These differences make vue-next a more powerful and efficient framework for building user interfaces.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Vue.js, vue-next

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Simon
Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

DecidedonVuetifyVuetifyVue.jsVue.jsNuxt.jsNuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

  • @{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
  • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
  • @{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
  • @{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
  • @{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
  • @{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
  • @{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
  • @{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
  • @{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

  • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
  • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
  • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
  • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
  • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
  • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
5.13M views5.13M
Comments
Kamaleshwar
Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

It was easier to find people who've worked on React than Vue. Angular did not have this problem, but seemed way too bloated compared to React. Angular also brings in restrictions working within their MVC framework. React on the other hand only handles the view/rendering part and rest of the control is left to the developers. React has a very active community, support and has lots of ready-to-use plugins/libraries available.

683k views683k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Vue.js
Vue.js
vue-next
vue-next

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

It is the next major version of Vue. It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Reactivity; Components; Modularity; Animations; Routing; Stability; Extendable Data bindings; Plain JS object models; Build UI by composing components; Mix & matching small libraries
Next major version of Vue; Single-File Component support; Support for vue-router; Support for vuex; Support for vue-cli; Support for vue-test-utils
Statistics
GitHub Stars
209.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
33.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
55.5K
Stacks
12
Followers
44.7K
Followers
14
Votes
1.6K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 294
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 230
    Good documentation
  • 196
    Components
  • 131
    Simple the best
  • 100
    Simplified AngularJS
Cons
  • 9
    Less Common Place
  • 5
    YXMLvsHTML Markup
  • 3
    Only support programatically multiple root nodes
  • 3
    Don't support fragments
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Vue CLI
Vue CLI
vuex
vuex
Vue Router
Vue Router

What are some alternatives to Vue.js, vue-next?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase