StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. StimulusReflex vs Vaadin

StimulusReflex vs Vaadin

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vaadin
Vaadin
Stacks198
Followers279
Votes36
GitHub Stars631
Forks81
StimulusReflex
StimulusReflex
Stacks11
Followers12
Votes8

StimulusReflex vs Vaadin: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between StimulusReflex and Vaadin

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Language Support**: StimulusReflex mainly operates with Ruby on Rails, while Vaadin typically uses Java or TypeScript for development.
2. **User Interface Components**: Vaadin provides a wide range of pre-built UI components, whereas StimulusReflex focuses on reactivity within single-page applications.
3. **Real-time Communication**: StimulusReflex uses WebSockets for real-time updates, while Vaadin utilizes server/client communication through HTTP requests.
4. **Learning Curve**: Vaadin may have a steeper learning curve due to its complex component hierarchy and server-side architecture compared to StimulusReflex's more straightforward approach.
5. **Community and Ecosystem**: Vaadin has a larger community and ecosystem with more resources and plugins available, while StimulusReflex might have a more limited support network.
6. **Deployment Options**: Vaadin allows for deployment to a wide variety of platforms, including cloud services, while StimulusReflex is primarily focused on Rails applications running on dedicated servers.

In Summary, StimulusReflex and Vaadin differ in language support, UI components, real-time communication, learning curve, community involvement, and deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vaadin
Vaadin
StimulusReflex
StimulusReflex

It is the fastest way to build web applications in Java. It automates the communication between your server and the browser and gives you a high-level component API for all Vaadin components

It is an exciting new way to build modern, reactive, real-time apps with Ruby on Rails. It eliminates the complexity imposed by full-stack frontend frameworks. And, it's fast. It works seamlessly with the Rails tooling you already know and love.

-
Server-rendered HTML, delivered in miliseconds over the wire via Websockets; ERB templates and partials, with first-class ViewComponent support; Russian doll caching and ActiveJob; StimulusJS and Turbolinks; Built with CableReady, our secret power-move
Statistics
GitHub Stars
631
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
81
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
198
Stacks
11
Followers
279
Followers
12
Votes
36
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Java
  • 7
    Compatibility
  • 6
    Open Source
  • 6
    Components
  • 3
    Performance
Cons
  • 3
    Paid for more features
Pros
  • 2
    Based on CableReady for dom diffing
  • 2
    Deklarative - no Javascript
  • 2
    Most simple extension of the MVC model
  • 2
    Reactive stateless frontends
Cons
  • 1
    Rails backend needed
Integrations
No integrations available
Rails
Rails

What are some alternatives to Vaadin, StimulusReflex?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase