StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript Framework Components
  5. Storybook vs styled-components

Storybook vs styled-components

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

styled-components
styled-components
Stacks2.6K
Followers608
Votes12
GitHub Stars41.0K
Forks2.5K
Storybook
Storybook
Stacks1.9K
Followers643
Votes0
GitHub Stars88.6K
Forks9.8K

Storybook vs styled-components: What are the differences?

Storybook and styled-components are both popular tools used in front-end development to build and organize UI components. However, they serve different purposes and offer distinct features that set them apart from each other.
  1. Integration: Storybook is a development environment that allows developers to build and test UI components independently. It provides a platform for isolating components and viewing them in different states, making it easier to develop, test, and showcase components in isolation. On the other hand, styled-components is a CSS-in-JS library that enables writing component-specific CSS styles directly within JavaScript. It allows developers to create reusable styled components with scoped styling, making it easier to style and maintain components.

  2. Component Structure: Storybook focuses on organizing and documenting UI components, providing a structured way to build and showcase them. It offers a centralized library where developers can browse and document components, making it easier to reuse and maintain them. In contrast, styled-components focuses on enhancing the styling capabilities of components. It allows developers to define styles directly within components, making it easier to encapsulate and manage styles.

  3. Dependency: Storybook is a standalone tool that can be used with any front-end framework or library, making it framework-agnostic. It can be integrated with React, Angular, Vue, and other popular frameworks. On the other hand, styled-components is a specific library intended for use with React. It provides React components that allow styled styling directly within JSX syntax.

  4. Workflow: Storybook promotes a component-driven development workflow, where components are developed and tested in isolation before being integrated into applications. It allows developers to work on components independently, increasing productivity and collaboration. In contrast, styled-components is more suited for defining styles within components themselves. It allows developers to focus on the visual representation of components and style them directly alongside their logic.

  5. CSS Paradigm: Storybook does not dictate any specific CSS paradigm and allows developers to use any CSS-in-JS solution or traditional CSS approach within components. This flexibility allows developers to choose the CSS approach that best fits their project requirements. On the other hand, styled-components follows a CSS-in-JS approach, where component styles are defined using JavaScript. This approach offers benefits like scoped styles, theme support, and dynamic styling.

  6. Developer Experience: Storybook provides a rich development environment with features like hot reloading, interactive component preview, and various add-ons. It aims to enhance the developer experience by providing tools for efficient component development and testing. Styled-components also focuses on improving the developer experience by offering a streamlined way to style components. It provides a cleaner and more intuitive syntax for defining styles, reducing the complexity of traditional CSS styling.

In Summary, Storybook and styled-components differ in their purpose, with Storybook focusing on component development and testing, and styled-components focusing on styling components in a CSS-in-JS manner. These differences include integration capabilities, component structure, dependencies, workflow, CSS paradigms, and developer experience. Both tools have their own strengths and can be used in tandem to build robust and well-styled UI components.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

styled-components
styled-components
Storybook
Storybook

Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅

It is an open source tool for developing UI components in isolation for React, Vue, and Angular. It makes building stunning UIs organized and efficient.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
41.0K
GitHub Stars
88.6K
GitHub Forks
2.5K
GitHub Forks
9.8K
Stacks
2.6K
Stacks
1.9K
Followers
608
Followers
643
Votes
12
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Very easy to use and integrate
  • 1
    Huihui
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to styled-components, Storybook?

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Angular Universal

Angular Universal

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Angular Material

Angular Material

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

PrimeReact

PrimeReact

PrimeReact is a rich set of open source UI Components for React.

React Router

React Router

React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering.

Buefy

Buefy

We like to think that Buefy is the javascript layer for your Bulma interface, since it doesn't require for it to be a sophisticated Single-Page Application. You can import it completely or single components on a ordinary webpage and use Vue.js as a replacement for jQuery.

Mantine

Mantine

It is an MIT licensed open source React components and hooks library with a focus on usability, accessibility, and developer experience. You can build fully functional accessible web applications faster than ever – it includes more than 120 customizable components and hooks to cover you in any situation.

React Starter Kit

React Starter Kit

React Starter Kit is an opinionated boilerplate for web development built on top of Facebook's React library, Node.js / Express server and Flux architecture. Containing modern web development tools such as Webpack, Babel and BrowserSync.

Vuesax

Vuesax

Vuesax is a framework of components based on vue js, it is a framework that is designed from scratch to be incrementally adoptable. The framework is focused on facilitating the development of applications, improving the design of the same without removing the necessary functionality. we want all the components to be independent in colors, shapes and design for a freedom that we like all front-end but without losing the speed of creation and production.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase