Alternatives to Tilda logo

Alternatives to Tilda

Readymag, Squarespace, Wix, WordPress, and Webflow are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Tilda.
69
54
+ 1
8

What is Tilda and what are its top alternatives?

Tilda is a website builder platform that offers a drag-and-drop interface for creating websites without the need for coding skills. It provides a variety of pre-designed blocks, templates, and themes to choose from, making it easy to create visually appealing websites. However, Tilda's customization options are limited compared to other website builders, and it may not be suitable for users looking for more advanced features.

  1. Wix: Wix is a popular website builder that offers a wide range of templates, customization options, and features such as an app market. Pros: Easy to use, vast template selection. Cons: Limited e-commerce capabilities on lower-tier plans.
  2. Squarespace: Squarespace is a user-friendly website builder known for its beautiful templates and design customization options. Pros: Modern templates, robust blogging features. Cons: Limited third-party integrations.
  3. WordPress: WordPress is a versatile content management system that allows for extensive customization through themes and plugins. Pros: Highly customizable, large community support. Cons: Learning curve for beginners.
  4. Weebly: Weebly is a drag-and-drop website builder with e-commerce capabilities and responsive themes. Pros: Intuitive interface, e-commerce features. Cons: Limited design flexibility.
  5. Webflow: Webflow is a design tool that allows for visually building websites with custom code export capabilities. Pros: Advanced design control, code export. Cons: Steep learning curve.
  6. Shopify: Shopify is an e-commerce platform with website building capabilities, specifically tailored for online stores. Pros: Robust e-commerce features, easy store management. Cons: Higher pricing plans.
  7. GoDaddy Website Builder: GoDaddy Website Builder is a beginner-friendly platform with simple drag-and-drop tools and a range of templates. Pros: Easy to use, domain registration included. Cons: Limited design flexibility.
  8. Elementor: Elementor is a WordPress plugin that offers advanced design and customization options for creating websites. Pros: Powerful design capabilities, live editing. Cons: Requires WordPress installation.
  9. Duda: Duda is a website builder catering to agencies and businesses, offering advanced design customization and client management features. Pros: White-labeling options, multi-site management. Cons: Higher pricing plans.
  10. Jimdo: Jimdo is a simple website builder with AI-powered tools for creating websites quickly. Pros: AI website creation, mobile editing capabilities. Cons: Limited design templates.

Top Alternatives to Tilda

  • Readymag
    Readymag

    Readymag—an online platform for website creation focused on design & creativity. Advanced typography. Powerful animations. Code injection & third-party tool integrations. ...

  • Squarespace
    Squarespace

    Whether you need simple pages, sophisticated galleries, a professional blog, or want to sell online, it all comes standard with your Squarespace website. Squarespace starts you with beautiful designs right out of the box — each handcrafted by our award-winning design team to make your content stand out. ...

  • Wix
    Wix

    Creating your stunning website for free is easier than ever. No tech skills needed. Just pick a template, change anything you want, add your images, videos, text and more to get online instantly. ...

  • WordPress
    WordPress

    The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family. ...

  • Webflow
    Webflow

    Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included! ...

  • Shopify
    Shopify

    Shopify powers tens of thousands of online retailers including General Electric, Amnesty International, CrossFit, Tesla Motors, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Foo Fighters, GitHub, and more. Our platform allows users to easily and quickly create their own online store without all the technical work involved in developing their own website, or the huge expense of having someone else build it. Shopify lets merchants manage all aspects of their shops: uploading products, changing the design, accepting credit card orders, and viewing their incoming orders and completed transactions. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

Tilda alternatives & related posts

Readymag logo

Readymag

21
14
Readymag is a browser-based design tool with unlimited possibilities for website creation.
21
14
PROS OF READYMAG
  • 4
    Design oriented
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 3
    No coding
  • 1
    Really powerful
  • 1
    Rapid website development
  • 1
    Clean designs
  • 1
    Live chat & 24/7 support team
CONS OF READYMAG
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Readymag posts

    Squarespace logo

    Squarespace

    2.1K
    84
    Everything You Need To Create An Exceptional Website
    2.1K
    84
    PROS OF SQUARESPACE
    • 35
      Easy setup
    • 31
      Clean designs
    • 8
      Beautiful responsive themes
    • 6
      Easy ongoing maintenance
    • 3
      Live chat & 24/7 support team
    • 1
      No coding necessary
    CONS OF SQUARESPACE
    • 1
      Hard to use custom code

    related Squarespace posts

    I am looking to make a website builder web app, where users can publish built websites with a custom or subdomain (much like Wix, Weebly, Squarespace, etc.), and I was wondering about any advice on which web framework to build it on? I currently know Node.js, but I would be excited to learn Laravel or Django if those would be better options. Any advice would be much appreciated!

    See more
    Niall Geoghegan
    at experiential psychotherapy institute · | 8 upvotes · 106.7K views

    I created a Squarespace website with multiple blog pages. I discovered that the native Squarespace commenting tool is not currently capable of letting people subscribe to my blog pages if they are using Google Chrome or Safari! I then discovered that Disqus email verification doesn't work with Yahoo Mail. I also hate that there's no way to turn off that email verification (which I don't need since I moderate all comments anyway). So I want to use a different commenting system. I've read some good things about Commento. Three questions: (1) will it work on a Squarespace site? (I'll pay a developer to integrate it for me) (2) Does it have its own issues/elements that don't work smoothly, similar to the other two? (3) Is there another plugin I should be considering for my Squarespace site?

    See more
    Wix logo

    Wix

    621
    12
    Wix.com is a web development platform enabling anyone to build a stunning online presence using simple cloud-based creation...
    621
    12
    PROS OF WIX
    • 12
      WYSIWYG
    CONS OF WIX
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Wix posts

      I am looking to make a website builder web app, where users can publish built websites with a custom or subdomain (much like Wix, Weebly, Squarespace, etc.), and I was wondering about any advice on which web framework to build it on? I currently know Node.js, but I would be excited to learn Laravel or Django if those would be better options. Any advice would be much appreciated!

      See more

      Hi,

      I'm a graphic designer and an acting teacher, and I want to build websites for each of my activities. A few months ago, I created, a Wix website, but it's not responsive. So, I plan to build one from scratch, as I want to host the content and not leave it to Wix or such companies. I was pretty decided to use WordPress to build my website (with "Local" macOS app), but I came across Bootstrap (via "blocs" macOS app).

      I'm now wondering which of these two options I should consider building my website? I want something clean, easy to customize, aesthetic, and easy to update. I read about the lack of SEO with Bootstrap, but I guess there's a way to compensate and promote the website anyway.

      Any piece of advice welcome! Thanks.

      See more
      WordPress logo

      WordPress

      99.4K
      2.1K
      A semantic personal publishing platform with a focus on aesthetics, web standards, and usability.
      99.4K
      2.1K
      PROS OF WORDPRESS
      • 417
        Customizable
      • 368
        Easy to manage
      • 356
        Plugins & themes
      • 259
        Non-tech colleagues can update website content
      • 248
        Really powerful
      • 145
        Rapid website development
      • 78
        Best documentation
      • 51
        Codex
      • 44
        Product feature set
      • 35
        Custom/internal social network
      • 18
        Open source
      • 8
        Great for all types of websites
      • 7
        Huge install and user base
      • 5
        Perfect example of user collaboration
      • 5
        Most websites make use of it
      • 5
        Best
      • 5
        It's simple and easy to use by any novice
      • 5
        I like it like I like a kick in the groin
      • 5
        Open Source Community
      • 4
        Community
      • 4
        API-based CMS
      • 3
        Easy To use
      • 2
        <a href="https://secure.wphackedhel">Easy Beginner</a>
      • 1
        Flexibility
      CONS OF WORDPRESS
      • 13
        Hard to keep up-to-date if you customize things
      • 13
        Plugins are of mixed quality
      • 10
        Not best backend UI
      • 2
        Complex Organization
      • 1
        Forced to use LAMP stack
      • 1
        Great Security
      • 1
        Do not cover all the basics in the core

      related WordPress posts

      Shared insights
      on
      ElementorElementorWordPressWordPress

      hello guys, I need your help. I created a website, I've been using Elementor forever, but yesterday I bought a template after I made the purchase I knew I made a mistake, cause the template was in HTML, can anyone please show me how to put this HTML template in my WordPress so it will be the face of my website, thank you in advance.

      See more
      Dale Ross
      Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.8M views

      I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

      I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

      Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

      See more
      Webflow logo

      Webflow

      797
      52
      Build responsive websites visually
      797
      52
      PROS OF WEBFLOW
      • 13
        Interactions and Animations
      • 7
        Builds clean code in the background
      • 7
        Fast development of html and css layouts/design
      • 6
        Free plan
      • 6
        Fully Customizable
      • 5
        Simple
      • 4
        Prototype
      • 2
        Built on web standards
      • 2
        Next Gen
      CONS OF WEBFLOW
      • 1
        Freemium
      • 1
        No Audio Support

      related Webflow posts

      David Yap
      CEO at Zensite Pte. Ltd. · | 10 upvotes · 14.6K views
      Shared insights
      on
      WordPressWordPressWebflowWebflow

      Hey, ive been developing my website on Webflow for more than 4 years now and constantly having issue with the Eliminate render-blocking resources issue on mobile in PSI. What can I do to resolve this as it is the only red item in optimizing the site. We didnt had this issue on WordPress earlier.

      For reference: Here's my website, Zensite

      See more
      Roman Eaton
      Product Manager at Carrrot · | 9 upvotes · 79K views

      We chose Webflow to build up websites faster and to make possible for particular employees to fix some misspellings or add an easy element to the page on their own - it is like Adobe Photoshop. To work with the incoming traffic we use our own product, that I can't pin here. It helps to make nurture visitors from the first session into the signing up and further activation into the product. In addition to @Carrrot we use Google Analytics to traffic source awareness, to monitor customers inside the product FullStory helps is a lot with its fury clicking and abandoned links. Activation and retention are done by our own product through the pop-ups, live chat, and emails that all based on customer behavior.

      See more
      Shopify logo

      Shopify

      12.5K
      76
      Quickly and easily create a beautiful online store with Shopify.
      12.5K
      76
      PROS OF SHOPIFY
      • 23
        Affordable yet comprehensive
      • 14
        Great API & integration options
      • 11
        Business-friendly
      • 10
        Intuitive interface
      • 9
        Quick
      • 3
        Liquid
      • 3
        Awesome customer support
      • 2
        POS & Mobile
      • 1
        Dummy Proof
      • 0
        Nopcommerce
      CONS OF SHOPIFY
      • 1
        User is stuck with building a site from a template

      related Shopify posts

      Simon Block
      Founder at Der Mainbauer · | 11 upvotes · 94.4K views

      Hi folks

      We want to move on from Shopify to a headless commerce system. We want to be able to manage multiple storefronts and integrate alternative order solutions like Whats App and social commerce etc. Same time we want to avoid full blown systems with a lot of unnecessary weight. My idea for the stack, so far:

      • Spree Commerce (Shop System),
      • Bloomreach (CMS),
      • Vue Storefront (Frontend)

      I will have to integrate billing solution (like Invoice Ninja), LexOffice for accounting, Optimoroute for the salesman problem, and some more. So flexibility and "easy expandability" is a core demand. Having said that I came across Medusa. It looks promising and seems to check all the boxes. Any thoughts? Basically, it's a decision between Ruby and JavaScript, is it? Can you name me pros and cons of one or both of the systems? What are the serious challenges that I will face going down either one of the roads? Is there another solution that you would highly recommend?

      I've linked our shop, currently running with Shopify.

      Thanks

      See more
      Deal Salt
      Shared insights
      on
      WordPressWordPressShopifyShopify

      Currently, I am using Shopify, and it's working fine somehow. I need to check the access and error logs I am able to do it. That's why thinking set up a WordPress instance on my server. I need a suggestion whether it is good or not. My current website is www.dealsalt.com, please advise.

      Thanks DealSalt

      See more
      Postman logo

      Postman

      96.3K
      1.8K
      Only complete API development environment
      96.3K
      1.8K
      PROS OF POSTMAN
      • 490
        Easy to use
      • 369
        Great tool
      • 276
        Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
      • 156
        Easy setup, looks good
      • 144
        The best api workflow out there
      • 53
        It's the best
      • 53
        History feature
      • 44
        Adds real value to my workflow
      • 43
        Great interface that magically predicts your needs
      • 35
        The best in class app
      • 12
        Can save and share script
      • 10
        Fully featured without looking cluttered
      • 8
        Collections
      • 8
        Option to run scrips
      • 8
        Global/Environment Variables
      • 7
        Shareable Collections
      • 7
        Dead simple and useful. Excellent
      • 7
        Dark theme easy on the eyes
      • 6
        Awesome customer support
      • 6
        Great integration with newman
      • 5
        Documentation
      • 5
        Simple
      • 5
        The test script is useful
      • 4
        Saves responses
      • 4
        This has simplified my testing significantly
      • 4
        Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
      • 4
        Easy as pie
      • 3
        API-network
      • 3
        I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
      • 3
        Mocking API calls with predefined response
      • 2
        Now supports GraphQL
      • 2
        Postman Runner CI Integration
      • 2
        Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
      • 2
        Continuous integration using newman
      • 2
        Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
      • 2
        Runner
      • 2
        Graph
      • 1
        <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
      CONS OF POSTMAN
      • 10
        Stores credentials in HTTP
      • 9
        Bloated features and UI
      • 8
        Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
      • 7
        Poor GraphQL support
      • 5
        Expensive
      • 3
        Not free after 5 users
      • 3
        Can't prompt for per-request variables
      • 1
        Import swagger
      • 1
        Support websocket
      • 1
        Import curl

      related Postman posts

      Noah Zoschke
      Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3.2M views

      We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

      Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

      Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

      This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

      Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

      Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

      Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

      See more
      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.9M views

      Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

      • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
      • npm as package manager
      • NestJS as Node.js framework
      • TypeScript as programming language
      • ExpressJS as web server
      • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
      • Postman as a tool for API development
      • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
      • JSON Web Token for access token management

      The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

      • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
      • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
      • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
      • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
      See more
      Postman logo

      Postman

      96.3K
      1.8K
      Only complete API development environment
      96.3K
      1.8K
      PROS OF POSTMAN
      • 490
        Easy to use
      • 369
        Great tool
      • 276
        Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
      • 156
        Easy setup, looks good
      • 144
        The best api workflow out there
      • 53
        It's the best
      • 53
        History feature
      • 44
        Adds real value to my workflow
      • 43
        Great interface that magically predicts your needs
      • 35
        The best in class app
      • 12
        Can save and share script
      • 10
        Fully featured without looking cluttered
      • 8
        Collections
      • 8
        Option to run scrips
      • 8
        Global/Environment Variables
      • 7
        Shareable Collections
      • 7
        Dead simple and useful. Excellent
      • 7
        Dark theme easy on the eyes
      • 6
        Awesome customer support
      • 6
        Great integration with newman
      • 5
        Documentation
      • 5
        Simple
      • 5
        The test script is useful
      • 4
        Saves responses
      • 4
        This has simplified my testing significantly
      • 4
        Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
      • 4
        Easy as pie
      • 3
        API-network
      • 3
        I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
      • 3
        Mocking API calls with predefined response
      • 2
        Now supports GraphQL
      • 2
        Postman Runner CI Integration
      • 2
        Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
      • 2
        Continuous integration using newman
      • 2
        Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
      • 2
        Runner
      • 2
        Graph
      • 1
        <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
      CONS OF POSTMAN
      • 10
        Stores credentials in HTTP
      • 9
        Bloated features and UI
      • 8
        Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
      • 7
        Poor GraphQL support
      • 5
        Expensive
      • 3
        Not free after 5 users
      • 3
        Can't prompt for per-request variables
      • 1
        Import swagger
      • 1
        Support websocket
      • 1
        Import curl

      related Postman posts

      Noah Zoschke
      Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3.2M views

      We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

      Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

      Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

      This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

      Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

      Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

      Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

      See more
      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.9M views

      Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

      • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
      • npm as package manager
      • NestJS as Node.js framework
      • TypeScript as programming language
      • ExpressJS as web server
      • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
      • Postman as a tool for API development
      • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
      • JSON Web Token for access token management

      The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

      • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
      • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
      • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
      • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
      See more