Alternatives to Zoho Cliq logo

Alternatives to Zoho Cliq

Slack, Skype, Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and HipChat are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Zoho Cliq.
8
16
+ 1
0

What is Zoho Cliq and what are its top alternatives?

It is a business communication app that includes real-time messaging, task management and automation. You can share files and make audio or video calls, right from within your chat channels. it is loaded with features to keep teams productive and cohesive.
Zoho Cliq is a tool in the Group Chat & Notifications category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Zoho Cliq

  • Slack

    Slack

    Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together. ...

  • Skype

    Skype

    Skype’s text, voice and video make it simple to share experiences with the people that matter to you, wherever they are. ...

  • Microsoft Teams

    Microsoft Teams

    See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations. ...

  • Zoom

    Zoom

    Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems. ...

  • HipChat

    HipChat

    HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business. ...

  • Telegram

    Telegram

    Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices. ...

  • Mattermost

    Mattermost

    Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

  • RocketChat

    RocketChat

    Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms. ...

Zoho Cliq alternatives & related posts

Slack logo

Slack

87.9K
67.4K
6K
Bring all your communication together in one place
87.9K
67.4K
+ 1
6K
PROS OF SLACK
  • 1.2K
    Easy to integrate with
  • 877
    Excellent interface on multiple platforms
  • 848
    Free
  • 694
    Mobile friendly
  • 690
    People really enjoy using it
  • 330
    Great integrations
  • 315
    Flexible notification preferences
  • 197
    Unlimited users
  • 184
    Strong search and data archiving
  • 155
    Multi domain switching support
  • 81
    Easy to use
  • 40
    Beautiful
  • 27
    Hubot support
  • 22
    Unread/read control
  • 21
    Slackbot
  • 19
    Permalink for each messages
  • 17
    Text snippet with highlighting
  • 15
    Quote message easily
  • 14
    Per-room notification
  • 13
    Awesome integration support
  • 12
    IRC gateway
  • 12
    Star for each message / attached files
  • 11
    Good communication within a team
  • 11
    Dropbox Integration
  • 10
    Jira Integration
  • 10
    Slick, search is great
  • 9
    New Relic Integration
  • 8
    Asana Integration
  • 8
    Great communication tool
  • 8
    Combine All Services Quickly
  • 7
    XMPP gateway
  • 7
    Awesomeness
  • 7
    This tool understands developers
  • 7
    Google Drive Integration
  • 6
    Replaces email
  • 6
    Twitter Integration
  • 6
    BitBucket integration
  • 6
    Google Docs Integration
  • 5
    GREAT Customer Support / Quick Response to Feedback
  • 5
    Jenkins Integration
  • 5
    Guest and Restricted user control
  • 4
    Gathers all my communications in one place
  • 4
    GitHub integration
  • 4
    Excellent multi platform internal communication tool
  • 4
    Mention list view
  • 3
    Easy to start working with
  • 3
    Visual Studio Integration
  • 3
    Perfect implementation of chat + integrations
  • 3
    Easy
  • 3
    Easy to add a reaction
  • 3
    Clean UI
  • 3
    Timely while non intrusive
  • 3
    Great on-boarding
  • 3
    Threaded chat
  • 2
    Intuitive, easy to use, great integrations
  • 2
    Simplicity
  • 2
    Great interface
  • 2
    So much better than email
  • 2
    Great Channel Customization
  • 2
    Message Actions
  • 2
    Eases collaboration for geographically dispersed teams
  • 2
    It's basically an improved (although closed) IRC
  • 2
    Android app
  • 1
    Great API
  • 1
    Very customizable
  • 1
    API
  • 1
    Easy remote communication
  • 1
    Get less busy
  • 1
    Targetprocess integration
  • 1
    Better User Experience
  • 1
    Finally with terrible "threading"—I miss Flowdock
  • 1
    Archive Importing
  • 1
    Great Support Team
  • 1
    Complete with plenty of Electron BLOAT
  • 1
    Markdown
  • 1
    Multi work-space support
  • 1
    Flexible and Accessible
  • 1
    Travis CI integration
  • 1
    It's the coolest IM ever
  • 1
    I was 666 star :D
  • 1
    Community
  • 1
    Dev communication Made Easy
  • 1
    Integrates with just about everything
  • 0
    Easy to useL
  • 0
    Platforms
CONS OF SLACK
  • 12
    Can be distracting depending on how you use it
  • 6
    Requires some management for large teams
  • 5
    Limit messages history
  • 4
    Too expensive
  • 4
    You don't really own your messages
  • 3
    Too many notifications by default

related Slack posts

Lucas Litton
Founder & CEO at Macombey · | 24 upvotes · 121.9K views

Sentry has been essential to our development approach. Nobody likes errors or apps that crash. We use Sentry heavily during Node.js and React development. Our developers are able to see error reports, crashes, user's browsers, and more, all in one place. Sentry also seamlessly integrates with Asana, Slack, and GitHub.

See more
Yonas Beshawred

Using Screenhero via Slack was getting to be pretty horrible. Video and sound quality was often times pretty bad and worst of all the service just wasn't reliable. We all had high hopes when the acquisition went through but ultimately, the product just didn't live up to expectations. We ended up trying Zoom after I had heard about it from some friends at other companies. We noticed the video/sound quality was better, and more importantly it was super reliable. The Slack integration was awesome (just type /zoom and it starts a call)

You can schedule recurring calls which is helpful. There's a G Suite (Google Calendar) integration which lets you add a Zoom call (w/dial in info + link to web/mobile) with the click of a button.

Meeting recordings (video and audio) are really nice, you get recordings stored in the cloud on the higher tier plans. One of our engineers, Jerome, actually built a cool little Slack integration using the Slack API and Zoom API so that every time a recording is processed, a link gets posted to the "event-recordings" channel. The iOS app is great too!

#WebAndVideoConferencing #videochat

See more
Skype logo

Skype

13.2K
10K
652
Voice calls, instant messaging, file transfer, and video conferencing
13.2K
10K
+ 1
652
PROS OF SKYPE
  • 258
    Free, widespread
  • 147
    Desktop and mobile apps
  • 110
    Because i have to :(
  • 57
    Low cost international calling
  • 56
    Good for international calls
  • 10
    Best call quality anywhere, generally
  • 5
    Beautiful emojis
  • 4
    Chat bots
  • 2
    Translator
  • 1
    User
  • 1
    Skype for business integration with Outlook
  • 1
    Not the Best, but get the job done
CONS OF SKYPE
  • 5
    Really high CPU utilization during video/screenshare
  • 3
    Not always reliable
  • 3
    Outdated UI
  • 3
    Birthday notifications are annoying
  • 3
    The worst indicator noises of any app ever
  • 2
    Finding/adding people isn't easy

related Skype posts

Dmitry Mukhin

Uploadcare is mostly remote team and we're using video conferencing all the time both for internal team meetings and for external sales, support, interview, etc. calls. I think we've tried every solution there is on the market before we've decided to stop with Zoom.

Tools just plainly don't work (Skype), are painful to install for external participants (Webex and other "enterprise" solutions) can't properly handle 10+ participants calls (Google Hangouts Chat).

Zoom just works. It has all required features and even handles bad connections very graciously. One of the best tool decisions we've ever made :)

See more
Mark Nelissen

I use Slack because it offers the best experience, even on the free tier (which we're still using). As a comparison, I have had in depth experience with HipChat, Stride, Skype, Google Chat (the new service), Google Hangouts (the old service). For self hosted, Mattermost is open source and claims to support most Slack integrations, but I have not extensively investigated this claim.

See more
Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

1.6K
1.3K
138
Chat-based workspace in Office 365
1.6K
1.3K
+ 1
138
PROS OF MICROSOFT TEAMS
  • 28
    Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow
  • 23
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Free
  • 12
    Great integrations
  • 11
    Well-thought Design
  • 10
    Channels
  • 8
    Easy setup
  • 6
    Unlimited users
  • 5
    Strong search and data archiving
  • 4
    Easy to integrate with
  • 4
    Multi domain switching support
  • 3
    Same interface on multiple platforms
  • 3
    Web interface
  • 2
    Great voice quality
CONS OF MICROSOFT TEAMS
  • 16
    Confusing UI
  • 12
    Bad performance on init and after quite a use
  • 9
    Bad Usermanagement
  • 6
    Can't see all members in a video meeting
  • 6
    No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)
  • 5
    No Markdown Support
  • 5
    Unable to Mute users
  • 4
    Forced WYSIWYG
  • 4
    MIssing public channels
  • 4
    You don't really own your messages
  • 3
    Challenging Onboarding
  • 3
    Is bad
  • 3
    Stubborn, unused friendly
  • 3
    No linux support

related Microsoft Teams posts

Jon Waite
Scrum Master at Costco Wholsale · | 3 upvotes · 41.9K views

Looking for the pros and cons for a tool we can use best for cross-team collaboration (software development). Has anyone compared Google Hangouts Chat with Microsoft Teams? What were the advantages of either??

See more
Jack Graves
Head of Product Development at Automation Consultants · | 2 upvotes · 189.7K views

We use Microsoft Teams as our primary workplace collaboration tool. It enables our team to work remotely and still collaborate on projects - with integration to JIRA and Confluence, the tool enables us to create War Rooms when problems occur and also provides information-sharing capabilities. Replaced HipChat.

See more
Zoom logo

Zoom

1.4K
1.7K
155
Video Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen Sharing
1.4K
1.7K
+ 1
155
PROS OF ZOOM
  • 25
    Web conferencing made easy
  • 16
    Remote control option
  • 13
    Draw on screen
  • 12
    Very reliable
  • 11
    In-meeting chat is pretty good
  • 9
    Free
  • 9
    Pair programming sessions with shared controls
  • 8
    Easy to share meeting links/invites
  • 7
    Good Sound Quality
  • 6
    Cloud recordings for meetings
  • 5
    Great mobile app
  • 4
    Recording Feature
  • 4
    Virtual backgrounds
  • 4
    Other people use it
  • 4
    User Friendly actions
  • 2
    Different options for blocking chat
  • 2
    Auto reconnecting
  • 2
    Chrome extension is great to easily create meetings
  • 2
    While sharing screen, you can still see your video
  • 2
    Mute all participants at once
  • 2
    When ending the videocall, everybody gets kicked
  • 2
    Reactions (emoticons)
  • 1
    Easily share video with audio
  • 1
    /zoom on Slack
  • 1
    Registration form
  • 1
    Meant for business and education
  • 0
    Zoom
CONS OF ZOOM
  • 20
    Limited time if you are a basic member
  • 14
    Limited Storage
  • 11
    Hate how sharing your screen defaults to Full Screen
  • 10
    Quality isn't great (Free)
  • 9
    No cursor highlight on screenshare.
  • 8
    Potential security flaws
  • 7
    Onboarding process for new users is not intuitive
  • 5
    Virtual background quality isn't good
  • 5
    Security
  • 4
    Editing can be improved
  • 4
    Doesn't handle switching audio sources well
  • 4
    The native calendar is buggy
  • 4
    Dashboard can be improved
  • 3
    Pornographic material displayed
  • 3
    Any body can get in it
  • 3
    Not many emojis
  • 3
    Past chat history is not saved
  • 3
    Recording Feature
  • 3
    En In reality,the chat in the meet not is excelent,noo
  • 3
    Zoom lags a lot

related Zoom posts

Dmitry Mukhin

Uploadcare is mostly remote team and we're using video conferencing all the time both for internal team meetings and for external sales, support, interview, etc. calls. I think we've tried every solution there is on the market before we've decided to stop with Zoom.

Tools just plainly don't work (Skype), are painful to install for external participants (Webex and other "enterprise" solutions) can't properly handle 10+ participants calls (Google Hangouts Chat).

Zoom just works. It has all required features and even handles bad connections very graciously. One of the best tool decisions we've ever made :)

See more
Shared insights
on
ZoomZoomDiscordDiscord

I want to host an online Jeopardy game with less than 30 participants. During each round of the game, I'll stream some videos. The point is to gather friends together to play the Jeopardy game and watch random stuff. Please let me know if there's a more suitable platform other than Discord and Zoom. Thanks, everyone!

See more
HipChat logo

HipChat

1.3K
882
683
Supercharge team collaboration with group chat and IM
1.3K
882
+ 1
683
PROS OF HIPCHAT
  • 144
    Integrates well with a lot of developer tools
  • 96
    Developer-friendly
  • 85
    Clients for every major platform
  • 70
    Mobile-friendly
  • 70
    Free unlimited users
  • 40
    Extremely easy to use for non-tech guys
  • 39
    Good api integration
  • 38
    Irc-like
  • 28
    Reliable
  • 26
    Feature rich
  • 13
    Affordable at $2/user
  • 6
    Email notifications
  • 6
    Text Messages
  • 4
    More developer-friendly than Skype
  • 3
    JIRA integration
  • 3
    Integrates with Atlassian products
  • 2
    Team Chat Rooms
  • 2
    Full text search
  • 1
    Intergration with all the things
  • 1
    gitlab
  • 1
    tagia
  • 1
    salt
  • 1
    Fast
  • 1
    On-Premise deployment
  • 1
    Trello integration
  • 1
    256-bit SSL encryption to transmit your data
CONS OF HIPCHAT
  • 1
    Purchased by and merged with Slack
  • 1
    Discontinued with the Atlassian Stack

related HipChat posts

Mark Nelissen

I use Slack because it offers the best experience, even on the free tier (which we're still using). As a comparison, I have had in depth experience with HipChat, Stride, Skype, Google Chat (the new service), Google Hangouts (the old service). For self hosted, Mattermost is open source and claims to support most Slack integrations, but I have not extensively investigated this claim.

See more
Jack Graves
Head of Product Development at Automation Consultants · | 2 upvotes · 189.7K views

We use Microsoft Teams as our primary workplace collaboration tool. It enables our team to work remotely and still collaborate on projects - with integration to JIRA and Confluence, the tool enables us to create War Rooms when problems occur and also provides information-sharing capabilities. Replaced HipChat.

See more
Telegram  logo

Telegram

566
464
29
A cloud-based instant messaging and voice over IP service
566
464
+ 1
29
PROS OF TELEGRAM
  • 11
    Lightweight
  • 5
    Great bot API
  • 5
    Unlimited history
  • 5
    Free
  • 1
    Can hide phone number
  • 1
    Media editor
  • 1
    Delete without a trace
CONS OF TELEGRAM
  • 2
    Notification customisation is limited
  • 2
    Requires phone number
  • 1
    No video call

related Telegram posts

Mattermost logo

Mattermost

410
500
275
Open-source, self-hosted, Slack alternative
410
500
+ 1
275
PROS OF MATTERMOST
  • 54
    Open source
  • 38
    On-premise deployment
  • 25
    Free
  • 22
    Built using golang
  • 19
    Fast and easy to use
  • 14
    Full text search
  • 13
    Docker image provided for easy setup
  • 12
    Built using react
  • 11
    Search and data archiving
  • 9
    Very professional
  • 9
    Supports multiple teams
  • 8
    Keeps us focused, effective, concise
  • 7
    Webhooks support
  • 6
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 6
    Clean and simple look
  • 5
    Well documented
  • 5
    Use #Hashtags like Twitter
  • 3
    Import Slack logs
  • 3
    Reactive community and ease of use
  • 2
    Self managed data
  • 1
    Easy webhook integration
  • 1
    On-premises Deployment
  • 1
    Secure
  • 1
    Slack-compatible integrations
  • 0
    On premise installation
CONS OF MATTERMOST
  • 1
    Not compatible with Telegram keys, which used by FSB
  • 1
    Basic permissions only in enterprise edition
  • 1
    Custom sidewide themes only in enterprise
  • 1
    Many basic features are enterprise only
  • 1
    Less integrations and plugins than slack

related Mattermost posts

Mark Nelissen

I use Slack because it offers the best experience, even on the free tier (which we're still using). As a comparison, I have had in depth experience with HipChat, Stride, Skype, Google Chat (the new service), Google Hangouts (the old service). For self hosted, Mattermost is open source and claims to support most Slack integrations, but I have not extensively investigated this claim.

See more
rishig
Head of Product at Zulip · | 5 upvotes · 133.2K views

I use Zulip instead of Slack, Mattermost, or RocketChat because of its first class threading. One week after switching to Gmail (in 2004) I realized I was never (willingly) going to use an unthreaded email product again. I had that same experience the first time I saw Zulip.

Zulip is also fully open-source, with a well-maintained (e.g. 90+% test coverage, fully static python), easily extensible code-base. In many companies, your communication platform (chat or email) is the center of the workplace -- no one asks for a chat integration into their calendar, they ask for a calendar integration into their chat. A fully open-source codebase means you can customize Zulip to your needs, and are never at the whim of a corporate maintainer who can't or won't fix simple bugs, or who will charge you tens of thousands of dollars for making minor customizations.

See more
RocketChat logo

RocketChat

345
486
322
Open source slack alternative
345
486
+ 1
322
PROS OF ROCKETCHAT
  • 71
    Open source
  • 38
    Can be deployed on premise
  • 32
    Byos (bring your own server)
  • 30
    Faster than Slack
  • 21
    Mobile app for iphone, ipad, and ipod touch
  • 19
    Desktop client for mac and windows
  • 19
    Built using meteor
  • 13
    Easily deployed on Cloud Services (Heroku, etc)
  • 10
    Screen Sharing
  • 9
    Excellent support & service, bar-none
  • 8
    Video and audio
  • 6
    Web client
  • 5
    Mobile app for android phone, tablet, and tv stick
  • 5
    Docker Image for easy setup
  • 5
    Open source
  • 5
    Multiple Security integrations - LDAP etc
  • 5
    Amazing product, fast moving development, and BYOS
  • 4
    Great development team
  • 4
    Free
  • 4
    Datacontrol
  • 2
    Love it - running on R Pi 2
  • 2
    Open source server
  • 1
    Linux Client Support
  • 1
    Flexible Integrations
  • 1
    Ldap integration
  • 1
    Slack bridge
  • 1
    Broadcast & Readonly channels
  • 0
    Threading model
CONS OF ROCKETCHAT
  • 1
    Not as well-known as others like it

related RocketChat posts

rishig
Head of Product at Zulip · | 5 upvotes · 133.2K views

I use Zulip instead of Slack, Mattermost, or RocketChat because of its first class threading. One week after switching to Gmail (in 2004) I realized I was never (willingly) going to use an unthreaded email product again. I had that same experience the first time I saw Zulip.

Zulip is also fully open-source, with a well-maintained (e.g. 90+% test coverage, fully static python), easily extensible code-base. In many companies, your communication platform (chat or email) is the center of the workplace -- no one asks for a chat integration into their calendar, they ask for a calendar integration into their chat. A fully open-source codebase means you can customize Zulip to your needs, and are never at the whim of a corporate maintainer who can't or won't fix simple bugs, or who will charge you tens of thousands of dollars for making minor customizations.

See more
Pradeep Sreeram
Shared insights
on
MattermostMattermostRocketChatRocketChat

We need to develop a social media like chat in which users can message each other or create a channel. We are planning to use RocketChat or Mattermost under the hood to develop a custom UI. How do notifications work in that case? Has anyone done it? Or is there any better way to implement it.

See more