StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Static Site Generators
  5. 11ty vs React-Static

11ty vs React-Static

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React-Static
React-Static
Stacks46
Followers114
Votes3
11ty
11ty
Stacks107
Followers120
Votes15
GitHub Stars19.0K
Forks556

11ty vs React-Static: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare and contrast 11ty and React-Static, two popular tools for building websites. We will highlight the key differences between these two technologies to help you understand which one may be better suited for your specific needs.

  1. Configuration: One key difference between 11ty and React-Static lies in their configuration. 11ty uses a simple and flexible configuration approach, allowing developers to easily customize their static site generation process. On the other hand, React-Static offers a more opinionated configuration setup, providing a structured and guided approach to building static websites.

  2. Data Sources: Another crucial difference is how these tools handle data sources. With 11ty, developers have the flexibility to use various data sources such as JSON, markdown, or even JavaScript functions. This allows for dynamic content generation. In contrast, React-Static primarily relies on external data sources or APIs to fetch and display data on the website.

  3. Rendering: When it comes to rendering, 11ty takes a traditional server-side rendering (SSR) approach. This means that pages are pre-rendered and served to the client as static HTML files, providing fast loading times and good SEO compatibility. On the other hand, React-Static uses a hybrid rendering approach, where some pages are pre-rendered while others are rendered on the client-side using JavaScript. This can provide a more interactive user experience but may sacrifice some SEO benefits.

  4. Component Structure: The way components are structured also differs between the two tools. With 11ty, components are typically written in JavaScript or templating languages like Nunjucks or Handlebars. This makes it easier to reuse and share components across different pages. Whereas in React-Static, components are written in React, offering a more modern and powerful component architecture with features like JSX and hooks.

  5. Routing: The routing mechanisms of these technologies also differ. In 11ty, routing is file-based and follows the directory structure of the project, making it intuitive and easy to understand. React-Static, on the other hand, uses a configurable routing system, allowing developers to define routes explicitly in a dedicated configuration file.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Finally, the size and diversity of the communities and ecosystems surrounding these technologies vary. 11ty has gained popularity within the static site generation community, with a growing number of plugins and resources available. React-Static, being built on top of React, benefits from the vast React ecosystem and a larger community, providing access to a wider range of libraries and tools.

In summary, while both 11ty and React-Static offer solutions for building static websites, they differ in terms of configuration flexibility, data source handling, rendering approach, component structure, routing mechanisms, and community support. The choice between these tools depends on the specific requirements and preferences of your project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

React-Static
React-Static
11ty
11ty

React-Static is a next-gen static site generator for React. Finally, you can build a website like you do any other React App. There's no special CMS, query language, or crazy lifecycle hooks. Just good old React producing an amazing SEO-ready, user experience driven, progressively enhanced website. The effort is minimal, but the benefits are not!

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

React. Enough said;Blazing fast performance;Data Agnostic. Feed your site data from anywhere, however you want;Built for SEO, by SEO professionals;React-first developer experience;Painless project setup & migration;Supports 99.9% of the React ecosystem. Including CSS-in-JS libraries, custom Query layers like GraphQL, and even Redux!;Aggressive and flexible reloading
Uses independent template engines;Works with your project’s existing directory structure;Works with multiple template languages; Zero-config by default but has flexible configuration options;JavaScript alternative to Jekyll
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
19.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
556
Stacks
46
Stacks
107
Followers
114
Followers
120
Votes
3
Votes
15
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    GraphQL
  • 1
    All the benefits of a static website + React+GraphQL
Cons
  • 1
    GraphQL
Pros
  • 4
    Flexibility on choosing template
  • 3
    Great use of data files/sources
  • 3
    Content decoupled as much as possible from Eleventy
  • 3
    Flexible, allows progressive conversion of templates
  • 2
    Zero boilerplate client-side JavaScript
Integrations
React
React
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to React-Static, 11ty?

Jekyll

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hugo

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Hexo

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Pelican

Pelican

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

DocPad

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

MkDocs

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope