StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. ABP Commercial vs JHipster

ABP Commercial vs JHipster

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JHipster
JHipster
Stacks200
Followers327
Votes0
GitHub Stars22.2K
Forks4.1K
ABP Commercial
ABP Commercial
Stacks21
Followers63
Votes31

ABP Commercial vs JHipster: What are the differences?

# Introduction

ABP Commercial and JHipster are both popular development frameworks, but they have key differences that developers should consider before choosing one over the other.

1. **Architecture**: ABP Commercial is based on the Domain Driven Design (DDD) approach, providing a clean architecture with a focus on separation of concerns. JHipster, on the other hand, follows the microservices architecture, allowing for greater flexibility and scalability in larger and more complex projects.

2. **Code Generation**: ABP Commercial offers a code generation tool that automatically creates the necessary code based on the defined domain model. In contrast, JHipster also provides code generation capabilities, but it focuses more on generating the initial setup and scaffolding for the project, giving developers more control over the implementation details.

3. **Authentication and Authorization**: ABP Commercial comes with built-in support for authentication and authorization, including role-based permissions and security features. JHipster, while it does offer authentication options, may require additional configuration and customization to achieve the desired level of security in the application.

4. **Tech Stacks**: ABP Commercial is primarily built on the ASP.NET Core framework, which is well-suited for enterprise-level applications. JHipster, on the other hand, is based on Java Spring Boot and Angular/React/Vue for the frontend, offering a wider range of technology options for developers.

5. **Community Support**: JHipster has a large and active community of developers contributing to the project, providing resources, plugins, and support for users. ABP Commercial, being a commercial product, offers dedicated support and maintenance services, but may have limited community-driven resources available.

6. **Pricing**: ABP Commercial requires a subscription fee for access to the full range of features and support services. JHipster, being an open-source project, is free to use with no direct costs associated with it.

In Summary, ABP Commercial and JHipster differ in architecture, code generation, authentication, tech stacks, community support, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JHipster
JHipster
ABP Commercial
ABP Commercial

It is a free and open-source application generator used to quickly develop modern web applications and Microservices using Spring Boot + Angular / React / Vue.

It is a complete web development platform based on the ABP framework. It provides pre-built application modules, rapid application development tooling, professional UI themes, premium support and more.

-
ABP CLI; Modularity; Multi-Tenancy; Bootstrap Tag Helpers; Dynamic Forms; Authentication & Authorization; Cross-Cutting Concerns; Bundling & Minification; Virtual File System; Theming; Domain-Driven Design Infrastructure; Auto Rest Apis; Dynamic Client Proxies; Distributed Event Bus With RabbitMQ Integration; Test Infrastructure; Audit Logging & Entity Histories; Object To Object Mapping; Email & Sms Abstractions With Templating Support; Aspect-Oriented Programming; Dependency Injection By Conventions; Data Filtering
Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
200
Stacks
21
Followers
327
Followers
63
Votes
0
Votes
31
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Development productivity tools
  • 4
    Supports micro-service architecture
  • 3
    Enterprise ready, feature rich, pre-built modules
  • 3
    Professional UI themes
Integrations
No integrations available
Blazor
Blazor
.NET Core
.NET Core
MongoDB
MongoDB
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Hangfire
Hangfire
Chartbrew
Chartbrew

What are some alternatives to JHipster, ABP Commercial?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase