StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Ada vs C#

Ada vs C#

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

C#
C#
Stacks70.1K
Followers46.3K
Votes2.2K
Ada
Ada
Stacks36
Followers51
Votes8

Ada vs C#: What are the differences?

Introduction Ada and C# are both powerful programming languages used for various software development projects. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different purposes. In this article, we will explore six key differences between Ada and C#.

1. Memory Management: Ada is a statically typed language that provides fine-grained control over memory allocation and deallocation. It allows the programmer to manage memory explicitly, ensuring efficient memory usage. On the other hand, C# is a garbage-collected language where memory allocation and deallocation are automatically handled by the runtime. This makes C# easier to use for developers as they do not have to worry about manual memory management.

2. Exception Handling: Ada and C# have different approaches to exception handling. Ada uses exception handling as an integral part of the language, enforcing developers to handle exceptions explicitly. It provides structured exception handling mechanisms that ensure reliable error handling. In contrast, C# follows a similar approach but with a more flexible syntax and additional features such as exception filters. This allows C# developers to have more control and customization when handling exceptions.

3. Concurrency: Ada has built-in language-level support for concurrent programming. It provides tasking features that enable developers to write concurrent and parallel programs easily. Ada's tasking model allows fine-grained control over task execution and synchronization. In contrast, C# does not have built-in language-level support for concurrency, although it provides various libraries and frameworks to achieve concurrent programming. C# relies on features like tasks, threads, and synchronization primitives from the .NET framework to handle concurrency.

4. Language Paradigm: Ada is primarily a statically typed, strongly typed, and imperative language. It focuses on efficiency, reliability, and safety. Its strong typing helps catch errors early during compilation, reducing runtime bugs. C#, on the other hand, is a multi-paradigm language that combines elements of object-oriented, generic, functional, and imperative programming. C# provides developers with more flexibility and the ability to write code in different styles, depending on the requirements.

5. Platform Dependency: Ada is designed to be platform-independent, making it suitable for developing software that should run on multiple platforms. It offers a high level of portability, allowing Ada programs to be compiled and executed on various operating systems without modification. In contrast, C# is mainly used within the Microsoft ecosystem and relies on the .NET framework. While there are efforts to make C# more platform-independent through frameworks like .NET Core, it still has some platform dependencies.

6. Tooling and Ecosystem: Ada has a more focused and specialized tooling and ecosystem compared to C#. Ada compilers, development environments, and libraries are tailored towards safety-critical and high-assurance systems. It has integrated static analysis tools and formal verification support, ensuring high-quality software development. In contrast, C# has a broader tooling and ecosystem, supported by the extensive .NET framework and a large community. C# tools and libraries are available for a wide range of applications, from web development to game development.

In Summary, Ada and C# differ in memory management approaches, exception handling mechanisms, concurrency support, language paradigms, platform dependencies, and tooling/ecosystem characteristics. Understanding these differences is crucial in choosing the right language for a specific software development project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on C#, Ada

Andrew
Andrew

Chief Software Architect at Xelex Digital, LLC

Jun 27, 2020

Decided

In 2015 as Xelex Digital was paving a new technology path, moving from ASP.NET web services and web applications, we knew that we wanted to move to a more modular decoupled base of applications centered around REST APIs.

To that end we spent several months studying API design patterns and decided to use our own adaptation of CRUD, specifically a SCRUD pattern that elevates query params to a more central role via the Search action.

Once we nailed down the API design pattern it was time to decide what language(s) our new APIs would be built upon. Our team has always been driven by the right tool for the job rather than what we know best. That said, in balancing practicality we chose to focus on 3 options that our team had deep experience with and knew the pros and cons of.

For us it came down to C#, JavaScript, and Ruby. At the time we owned our infrastructure, racks in cages, that were all loaded with Windows. We were also at a point that we were using that infrastructure to it's fullest and could not afford additional servers running Linux. That's a long way of saying we decided against Ruby as it doesn't play nice on Windows.

That left us with two options. We went a very unconventional route for deciding between the two. We built MVP APIs on both. The interfaces were identical and interchangeable. What we found was easily quantifiable differences.

We were able to iterate on our Node based APIs much more rapidly than we were our C# APIs. For us this was owed to the community coupled with the extremely dynamic nature of JS. There were tradeoffs we considered, latency was (acceptably) higher on requests to our Node APIs. No strong types to protect us from ourselves, but we've rarely found that to be an issue.

As such we decided to commit resources to our Node APIs and push it out as the core brain of our new system. We haven't looked back since. It has consistently met our needs, scaling with us, getting better with time as continually pour into and expand our capabilities.

446k views446k
Comments
Erik
Erik

Chief Architect at LiveTiles

May 18, 2020

Decided

C# and .Net were obvious choices for us at LiveTiles given our investment in the Microsoft ecosystem. It enabled us to harness of the .Net framework to build ASP.Net MVC, WebAPI, and Serverless applications very easily. Coupled with the high productivity of Visual Studio, it's the native tongue of Microsoft technology.

614k views614k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

C#
C#
Ada
Ada

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

It is a structured, statically typed, imperative, and object-oriented high-level programming language, extended from Pascal and other languages. It has built-in language support for design by contract (DbC), extremely strong typing, explicit concurrency, tasks, synchronous message passing, protected objects, and non-determinism. Ada improves code safety and maintainability by using the compiler to find errors in favor of runtime errors.

-
Structured; Statically typed; Imperative; Object-oriented; High-level
Statistics
Stacks
70.1K
Stacks
36
Followers
46.3K
Followers
51
Votes
2.2K
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 351
    Cool syntax
  • 294
    Great lambda support
  • 267
    Great generics support
  • 212
    Language integrated query (linq)
  • 181
    Extension methods
Cons
  • 15
    Poor x-platform GUI support
  • 8
    Closed source
  • 7
    Fast and secure
  • 7
    Requires DllImportAttribute for getting stuff from unma
Pros
  • 1
    Strongly typed
  • 1
    Gnatmake
  • 1
    Information hiding, and real modularity
  • 1
    Ada Certification
  • 1
    Encapsulation
Cons
  • 1
    Difficult to learn
Integrations
.NET
.NET
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to C#, Ada?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Swift

Swift

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase