Overview

Next.js

Stacks8.0K

Followers5.1K

Votes330

GitHub Stars135.4K

Forks29.7K

AdonisJS

Stacks210

Followers456

Votes122

AdonisJS vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AdonisJS and Next.js

AdonisJS and Next.js are both popular frameworks used for web development, but they have several key differences that set them apart from each other.

Architecture: AdonisJS is a full-stack MVC framework written in JavaScript or TypeScript, while Next.js is a React framework that focuses more on server-side rendering (SSR) and static site generation (SSG). AdonisJS follows a traditional MVC architecture, while Next.js follows a component-based architecture.
Language: AdonisJS is built with JavaScript or TypeScript as its primary language, while Next.js is built using JavaScript and specifically designed for React applications.
Routing: AdonisJS provides an expressive and powerful routing system with support for named routes, route parameters, route groups, and route resources. On the other hand, Next.js uses file-based routing, where each page is a React component and the file structure determines the routing.
Backend Integration: AdonisJS comes with built-in tools and features for backend development, such as ORM, database migration, and authentication, making it a suitable choice for building full-stack applications. Next.js, on the other hand, is primarily focused on the frontend and requires additional setups or integrations to work with backend technologies.
Server-side Rendering (SSR) vs Client-side Rendering (CSR): AdonisJS performs server-side rendering by default, meaning that the server generates the HTML content before sending it to the client. Next.js, on the other hand, supports both server-side rendering and client-side rendering, allowing developers to choose the rendering strategy based on their specific requirements.
Component Reusability: Next.js leverages React's component-based architecture, which promotes component reusability and modularity. This makes it easier to build complex UIs by reusing components. AdonisJS also supports component reusability but in a different context, mainly for server-side rendering and backend development.

In summary, AdonisJS is a full-stack MVC framework designed for backend development, while Next.js is a React framework focused on server-side rendering and frontend development. AdonisJS provides a robust backend infrastructure, while Next.js offers flexibility in rendering strategies and component reusability.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Node.js Frameworks

A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

566

165k

Advice on Next.js, AdonisJS

Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js	AdonisJS
Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.	It is a Node.js Framework which is highly focused on developer ergonomics, stability and confidence.
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment	mvc, orm, service provider, router
Statistics
GitHub Stars 135.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 29.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 8.0K	Stacks 210
Followers 5.1K	Followers 456
Votes 330	Votes 122
Pros & Cons
Pros 51 Automatic server rendering and code splitting 44 Built with React 34 Easy setup 26 TypeScript 24 Universal JavaScript Cons 9 Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)	Pros 25 Laravel like 24 Easy to learn 23 MVC 21 Beautiful code 10 ORM Mapper Cons 5 Small community 1 Poor documentation
Integrations
React	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Next.js, AdonisJS?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.