StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. AIOHTTP vs Grape

AIOHTTP vs Grape

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Grape
Grape
Stacks101
Followers106
Votes10
AIOHTTP
AIOHTTP
Stacks125
Followers143
Votes0
GitHub Stars16.1K
Forks2.2K

AIOHTTP vs Grape: What are the differences?

AIOHTTP: Asynchronous HTTP Client/Server for asyncio and Python. It is an Async http client/server framework. It supports both client and server Web-Sockets out-of-the-box and avoids Callback It provides Web-server with middlewares and pluggable routing.; Grape: An opinionated micro-framework for creating REST-like APIs in Ruby. Grape is a REST-like API micro-framework for Ruby. It's designed to run on Rack or complement existing web application frameworks such as Rails and Sinatra by providing a simple DSL to easily develop RESTful APIs. It has built-in support for common conventions, including multiple formats, subdomain/prefix restriction, content negotiation, versioning and much more.

AIOHTTP and Grape can be categorized as "Microframeworks (Backend)" tools.

Grape is an open source tool with 8.89K GitHub stars and 1.09K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Grape's open source repository on GitHub.

DivShot, TaxJar, and Master Of Code Global are some of the popular companies that use Grape, whereas AIOHTTP is used by Uploadcare, Hotjar, and Hivestack. Grape has a broader approval, being mentioned in 14 company stacks & 50 developers stacks; compared to AIOHTTP, which is listed in 10 company stacks and 12 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Grape
Grape
AIOHTTP
AIOHTTP

Grape is a REST-like API micro-framework for Ruby. It's designed to run on Rack or complement existing web application frameworks such as Rails and Sinatra by providing a simple DSL to easily develop RESTful APIs. It has built-in support for common conventions, including multiple formats, subdomain/prefix restriction, content negotiation, versioning and much more.

It is an Async http client/server framework. It supports both client and server Web-Sockets out-of-the-box and avoids Callback. It provides Web-server with middlewares and pluggable routing.

-
asyncio; client; server;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
16.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.2K
Stacks
101
Stacks
125
Followers
106
Followers
143
Votes
10
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Open source
  • 4
    Well documented
  • 2
    Can be used to apply good security to the whole API
Cons
  • 1
    Code structure makes reuse difficult
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Grape, AIOHTTP?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase