AIOHTTP vs LoopBack

Overview

LoopBack

Stacks285

Followers556

Votes33

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks1.2K

AIOHTTP

Stacks125

Followers143

Votes0

GitHub Stars16.1K

Forks2.2K

AIOHTTP vs LoopBack: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AIOHTTP and LoopBack are two popular frameworks in the world of web development. While both serve the purpose of building web applications, they have distinct differences that set them apart from each other. Below are the key differences between AIOHTTP and LoopBack.

1. Performance: AIOHTTP is known for its high performance due to its asynchronous nature, making it a great choice for handling a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. On the other hand, LoopBack, being a more traditional framework, may not have the same level of performance when it comes to handling a high volume of requests.

2. Language Support: AIOHTTP is primarily based on Python, offering developers a Pythonic way of writing web applications. In contrast, LoopBack is built on Node.js, allowing developers to leverage the capabilities of JavaScript for backend development. This difference in language support can influence a developer's choice based on their familiarity and expertise in a particular language.

3. Flexibility: AIOHTTP provides more flexibility to developers in terms of customization and control over the implementation details of their web applications. Developers have the freedom to design the architecture of their applications according to their specific requirements. On the contrary, LoopBack follows more conventions and predefined structures, limiting the extent of customization developers can achieve.

4. Community and Ecosystem: AIOHTTP has a smaller community compared to LoopBack, which means there may be fewer resources, plugins, and community support available for developers using AIOHTTP. LoopBack, with its larger community and ecosystem, offers developers a wider range of tools and resources to expedite the development process and troubleshoot any issues that may arise.

5. Supported Protocols: AIOHTTP natively supports HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 protocols, allowing developers to take advantage of features like server push and parallelism. While LoopBack also supports HTTP/1.1, it may require additional plugins or configurations to support HTTP/2, depending on the specific use case.

6. Framework Philosophy: AIOHTTP emphasizes simplicity and minimalism in its design philosophy, focusing on providing essential tools for building web applications without unnecessary complexity. In contrast, LoopBack aims to offer a more comprehensive solution with built-in features for authentication, data modeling, and API documentation, catering to developers looking for a more all-in-one framework solution.

In Summary, AIOHTTP and LoopBack differ in performance, language support, flexibility, community, supported protocols, and framework philosophy, making each framework suitable for developers with distinct preferences and requirements in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

LoopBack	AIOHTTP
A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs.	It is an Async http client/server framework. It supports both client and server Web-Sockets out-of-the-box and avoids Callback. It provides Web-server with middlewares and pluggable routing.
A brand new core; OpenAPI spec driven REST API; GraphQL support	asyncio; client; server;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.2K	GitHub Stars 16.1K
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks 2.2K
Stacks 285	Stacks 125
Followers 556	Followers 143
Votes 33	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 11 Need a nodejs ReST-API, DB, AAA, Swagger? Then loopback 9 Easy Database Migration 6 Code generator 4 The future of API's 2 GraphQL Cons 7 Community is slow 1 Backward compatibility	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js TypeScript ExpressJS StrongLoop GraphQL	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to LoopBack, AIOHTTP?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

AIOHTTP vs LoopBack: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AIOHTTP vs LoopBack

Overview