AIOHTTP vs Lumen

Overview

Lumen

Stacks429

Followers673

Votes161

GitHub Stars7.6K

Forks992

AIOHTTP

Stacks125

Followers143

Votes0

GitHub Stars16.1K

Forks2.2K

AIOHTTP vs Lumen: What are the differences?

Introduction: AIOHTTP and Lumen are two popular frameworks used in web development. They are known for their specific features and functionalities, which distinguish them from each other.

HTTP Client Support: AIOHTTP is primarily designed for building web servers, whereas Lumen is used for developing web applications. AIOHTTP provides a robust HTTP client that allows making asynchronous HTTP requests easily, while Lumen focuses more on server-side development and doesn't offer the same level of HTTP client support.
Async Support: AIOHTTP is asynchronous by nature, making it suitable for handling a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. On the other hand, Lumen is not inherently asynchronous and may not perform as well when dealing with high levels of parallel requests.
Layer of Abstraction: Lumen provides a simple and elegant syntax for building RESTful APIs quickly, abstracting away many complex configurations and settings. In contrast, AIOHTTP offers more flexibility and control over lower-level details, making it suitable for developers who need fine-grained control over their applications.
Community and Ecosystem: Lumen is part of the Laravel ecosystem, which is known for its extensive community support, rich documentation, and various packages. AIOHTTP, on the other hand, has a smaller community compared to Laravel, leading to potentially fewer resources and plugins available for developers.
Performance Optimization: AIOHTTP is known for its high-performance capabilities, especially in handling I/O-bound tasks efficiently. Lumen, while being fast and lightweight, may not offer the same level of optimization for specific use cases that require high-performance levels.
Learning Curve: AIOHTTP may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its asynchronous nature and lower-level approach. In comparison, Lumen's simplicity and similarity to Laravel make it more accessible to developers who are already familiar with the Laravel framework.

In Summary, AIOHTTP and Lumen differ in terms of HTTP client support, async support, layer of abstraction, community and ecosystem, performance optimization, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Lumen	AIOHTTP
Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.	It is an Async http client/server framework. It supports both client and server Web-Sockets out-of-the-box and avoids Callback. It provides Web-server with middlewares and pluggable routing.
-	asyncio; client; server;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.6K	GitHub Stars 16.1K
GitHub Forks 992	GitHub Forks 2.2K
Stacks 429	Stacks 125
Followers 673	Followers 143
Votes 161	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 38 API 28 Microframework 19 MVC 16 PHP 12 Open source Cons 3 Not fast 2 PHP 1 Not fast with MongoDB	No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Lumen, AIOHTTP?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

AIOHTTP vs Lumen: What are the differences?

Introduction: AIOHTTP and Lumen are two popular frameworks used in web development. They are known for their specific features and functionalities, which distinguish them from each other.

HTTP Client Support: AIOHTTP is primarily designed for building web servers, whereas Lumen is used for developing web applications. AIOHTTP provides a robust HTTP client that allows making asynchronous HTTP requests easily, while Lumen focuses more on server-side development and doesn't offer the same level of HTTP client support.
Async Support: AIOHTTP is asynchronous by nature, making it suitable for handling a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. On the other hand, Lumen is not inherently asynchronous and may not perform as well when dealing with high levels of parallel requests.
Layer of Abstraction: Lumen provides a simple and elegant syntax for building RESTful APIs quickly, abstracting away many complex configurations and settings. In contrast, AIOHTTP offers more flexibility and control over lower-level details, making it suitable for developers who need fine-grained control over their applications.
Community and Ecosystem: Lumen is part of the Laravel ecosystem, which is known for its extensive community support, rich documentation, and various packages. AIOHTTP, on the other hand, has a smaller community compared to Laravel, leading to potentially fewer resources and plugins available for developers.
Performance Optimization: AIOHTTP is known for its high-performance capabilities, especially in handling I/O-bound tasks efficiently. Lumen, while being fast and lightweight, may not offer the same level of optimization for specific use cases that require high-performance levels.
Learning Curve: AIOHTTP may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its asynchronous nature and lower-level approach. In comparison, Lumen's simplicity and similarity to Laravel make it more accessible to developers who are already familiar with the Laravel framework.

In Summary, AIOHTTP and Lumen differ in terms of HTTP client support, async support, layer of abstraction, community and ecosystem, performance optimization, and learning curve.