StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Terminal Emulators
  5. Alacritty vs Windows Terminal

Alacritty vs Windows Terminal

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Windows Terminal
Windows Terminal
Stacks155
Followers175
Votes6
GitHub Stars100.8K
Forks8.9K
Alacritty
Alacritty
Stacks27
Followers33
Votes2
GitHub Stars60.9K
Forks3.2K

Alacritty vs Windows Terminal: What are the differences?

Introduction

Alacritty and Windows Terminal are two popular terminal emulators that offer a variety of features for developers and power users. While both provide similar functionalities, there are key differences that set them apart. This article will outline six main differences between Alacritty and Windows Terminal.

  1. Customizability: Alacritty offers a high level of customization, allowing users to tweak various aspects of the terminal such as colors, fonts, and keybindings. It provides a YAML-based configuration file that allows users to easily modify the terminal to their preferences. On the other hand, Windows Terminal has limited customization options, with a focus on providing a consistent experience across different platforms and devices.

  2. Cross-Platform Support: Alacritty is built to be cross-platform and can be used on various operating systems, including macOS, Linux, and Windows. This makes it a versatile choice for developers who work on multiple platforms. In contrast, Windows Terminal is specifically designed for Windows and is not available for other operating systems.

  3. Performance: Alacritty is known for its exceptional performance and speed. It utilizes GPU acceleration and takes advantage of modern hardware to deliver a snappy and responsive terminal experience. Windows Terminal, while performant, may not match the speed of Alacritty in certain scenarios.

  4. Extensions and Plugins: Alacritty does not support extensions or plugins, aiming to keep the terminal lightweight and efficient. On the other hand, Windows Terminal has an extension system that allows users to enhance its functionality by adding plugins. This can be advantageous for users who require additional features beyond the core terminal functionalities.

  5. Clipboard Integration: Alacritty provides seamless clipboard integration, allowing users to easily copy and paste text between the terminal and other applications. It supports the system clipboard and provides keyboard shortcuts for efficient copying and pasting. Windows Terminal also offers clipboard integration but may not have the same level of flexibility and convenience as Alacritty.

  6. GPU Acceleration: Alacritty leverages hardware acceleration through the GPU to render the terminal, resulting in smooth scrolling and improved performance. Windows Terminal also supports GPU acceleration, but the extent of its utilization may vary depending on the user's system configuration.

In summary, Alacritty stands out with its extensive customization options, cross-platform support, and exceptional performance, while Windows Terminal offers a more consistent experience on Windows with support for extensions and plugins. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the user's specific needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Windows Terminal
Windows Terminal
Alacritty
Alacritty

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

Tabs; Rich text; Rlobalization; Configurability; Theming; Styling
Vi Mode; Motion; Selection; Opening URLs
Statistics
GitHub Stars
100.8K
GitHub Stars
60.9K
GitHub Forks
8.9K
GitHub Forks
3.2K
Stacks
155
Stacks
27
Followers
175
Followers
33
Votes
6
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Can be highly customized by using terminal preview
  • 2
    Add almost any cli tool using profiles
  • 2
    Free
Pros
  • 2
    Fast
  • 0
    Minmal
Integrations
GNU Bash
GNU Bash
Linux
Linux
Windows
Windows
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Windows Terminal, Alacritty?

iTerm2

iTerm2

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

Putty

Putty

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

Hyper Terminal

Hyper Terminal

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

Cmder

Cmder

It is a software package created out of pure frustration over the absence of nice console emulators on Windows. It is based on amazing software, and spiced up with the Monokai color scheme and a custom prompt layout.

ConEmu

ConEmu

It aims to be handy, comprehensive, fast and reliable terminal window where you may host any console application developed either for WinAPI (cmd, powershell, far) or Unix PTY (cygwin, msys, wsl bash).

SecureCRT

SecureCRT

It provides rock-solid terminal emulation for computing professionals, raising productivity with advanced session management and a host of ways to save time and streamline repetitive tasks. It provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organization.

Wave Terminal

Wave Terminal

It is an open-source, AI-native terminal that streamlines developer workflows with inline rendering, a modern UI, and persistent sessions. It offers plugins for rendering various file types, a powerful code editor, seamless local and remote session management, and native AI integration.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope