Amazon ECR vs Google Container Registry

Overview

Google Container Registry

Stacks52

Followers19

Votes0

Amazon ECR

Stacks355

Followers166

Votes5

Amazon ECR vs Google Container Registry: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this article, we will compare the key differences between Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) and Google Container Registry. Both ECR and Google Container Registry are container image registries that allow users to store, manage, and deploy container images.

Pricing Model: Amazon ECR charges for storage and data transfer separately, where storage costs are based on the amount of data stored in the registry and data transfer costs are based on the amount of data transferred out of the registry. On the other hand, Google Container Registry offers a simplified pricing model with a single cost for storage and data transfer combined.
Integration with Cloud Providers: Amazon ECR is tightly integrated with the Amazon Web Services (AWS) ecosystem, enabling seamless integration with other AWS services like Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) and AWS Fargate. In contrast, Google Container Registry is optimized for use with Google Cloud Platform (GCP) services, such as Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and Cloud Run.
Registry Accessibility: Amazon ECR provides both public and private registries, allowing users to choose whether their container images are publicly accessible or restricted to specific users and accounts. Google Container Registry, on the other hand, only supports private registries, ensuring that container images are accessible only to authorized users and projects.
Cross-Region Replication: Amazon ECR offers cross-region replication, which allows users to automatically replicate container images across different AWS regions for improved availability and disaster recovery. Google Container Registry, however, does not currently provide built-in cross-region replication functionality.
Custom Domain Mapping: Amazon ECR supports custom domain mapping, allowing users to associate their own domain names with their container registries, providing a more personalized experience. Google Container Registry does not have native support for custom domain mapping, making it more difficult to use custom domain names.
Image Vulnerability Scanning: Amazon ECR integrates with services like AWS Security Hub and AWS Fargate to provide built-in image vulnerability scanning for container images stored in the registry. Google Container Registry also offers image vulnerability scanning through the integration with Google Cloud Security Command Center.

In Summary, Amazon ECR offers a more comprehensive integration with AWS services, supports public and private registries, provides cross-region replication, allows custom domain mapping, and offers built-in image vulnerability scanning. On the other hand, Google Container Registry has a simplified pricing model, optimized integration with GCP services, and focuses on private registries security.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Container Registry	Amazon ECR
It is a single place for your team to manage Docker images, perform vulnerability analysis, and decide who can access what with fine-grained access control.	It is a fully managed container registry that makes it easy to store, manage, share, and deploy your container images and artifacts anywhere. It eliminates the need to operate your own container repositories or worry about scaling the underlying infrastructure.
Secure, private Docker registry; Build and deploy automatically; In-depth vulnerability scanning	Reduce your effort with a fully managed registry; Securely share and download container images; Provide fast and highly available access; Simplify your deployment workflow
Statistics
Stacks 52	Stacks 355
Followers 19	Followers 166
Votes 0	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 2 Highly secure as policies can be configured to manage p 1 Tight integration with Amazon ECS and the Docker CLI, a 1 Familiar to AWS users and easy to use 1 No upfront fees or commitments. You pay only for the am Cons 1 Potentially expensive if the containers being deployed 1 Difficult to use with docker client as it requires crea 1 Lack of insight into registry usage
Integrations
No integrations available	Kubernetes Docker Amazon EKS AWS IAM

What are some alternatives to Google Container Registry, Amazon ECR?

Harbor

Harbor is an open source cloud native registry that stores, signs, and scans container images for vulnerabilities. Harbor solves common challenges by delivering trust, compliance, performance, and interoperability. It fills a gap for organ

Quay.io

Simply upload your Dockerfile (and any additional files it needs) and we'll build your Dockerfile into an image and push it to your repository.

Kraken by Uber

A P2P-powered Docker registry that focuses on scalability and availability. It is designed for Docker image management, replication and distribution in a hybrid cloud environment.

Amazon Elastic Container Registry Public

It is a fully managed registry that makes it easy for a developer to publicly share container software worldwide for anyone to download. Anyone (with or without an AWS account) can use it to pull container software for use. Amazon ECR Public Gallery is a website that allows anyone to browse and search for public container images, view developer-provided details, and see pull commands. Developers no longer need to use different private and public registries when building and sharing their public container artifacts.

Gandalf

We provide a secure private registry where users can host their docker images and share them privately and securely within teams.

Related Comparisons

Amazon ECR vs Google Container Registry: What are the differences?

Pricing Model: Amazon ECR charges for storage and data transfer separately, where storage costs are based on the amount of data stored in the registry and data transfer costs are based on the amount of data transferred out of the registry. On the other hand, Google Container Registry offers a simplified pricing model with a single cost for storage and data transfer combined.
Integration with Cloud Providers: Amazon ECR is tightly integrated with the Amazon Web Services (AWS) ecosystem, enabling seamless integration with other AWS services like Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) and AWS Fargate. In contrast, Google Container Registry is optimized for use with Google Cloud Platform (GCP) services, such as Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and Cloud Run.
Registry Accessibility: Amazon ECR provides both public and private registries, allowing users to choose whether their container images are publicly accessible or restricted to specific users and accounts. Google Container Registry, on the other hand, only supports private registries, ensuring that container images are accessible only to authorized users and projects.
Cross-Region Replication: Amazon ECR offers cross-region replication, which allows users to automatically replicate container images across different AWS regions for improved availability and disaster recovery. Google Container Registry, however, does not currently provide built-in cross-region replication functionality.
Custom Domain Mapping: Amazon ECR supports custom domain mapping, allowing users to associate their own domain names with their container registries, providing a more personalized experience. Google Container Registry does not have native support for custom domain mapping, making it more difficult to use custom domain names.
Image Vulnerability Scanning: Amazon ECR integrates with services like AWS Security Hub and AWS Fargate to provide built-in image vulnerability scanning for container images stored in the registry. Google Container Registry also offers image vulnerability scanning through the integration with Google Cloud Security Command Center.

Amazon ECR vs Google Container Registry

Overview