.NET vs Android SDK

Overview

Android SDK

Stacks27.6K

Followers20.7K

Votes800

.NET

Stacks15.3K

Followers5.9K

Votes1.9K

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

.NET vs Android SDK: What are the differences?

Key Differences between .NET and Android SDK

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between .NET and Android SDK in terms of their key differences.

Language Support: .NET primarily uses C# as the programming language, while the Android SDK uses Java as the primary language. While .NET supports multiple languages, including C#, VB.NET, and F#, Android SDK's main focus is on Java.
Platform Compatibility: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft and primarily aimed at Windows-based platforms. On the other hand, the Android SDK is specifically designed for developing applications for the Android operating system.
IDE Compatibility: .NET offers a wide range of integrated development environments (IDEs) to choose from, including Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code. Android SDK, on the other hand, is mainly supported by Android Studio, an IDE specifically built for Android app development.
Native vs Cross-Platform Development: While .NET allows for both native and cross-platform development, Android SDK focuses on native development for the Android platform. .NET provides Xamarin, a cross-platform development tool, but it is not as tightly integrated as Android Studio and the Android SDK for native Android app development.
Code Execution: .NET compiles code into Intermediate Language (IL) and then uses the Common Language Runtime (CLR) to execute the code. In contrast, Android SDK and Java compile code into bytecode, which is then executed by the Java Virtual Machine (JVM).
Community and Support: .NET has a strong developer community and is well-supported by Microsoft with regular updates and documentation. The Android SDK also has a large community of developers, but it is mainly supported by Google, which provides frequent updates and comprehensive documentation.

In summary, .NET and Android SDK differ in terms of language support, platform compatibility, IDE compatibility, native vs cross-platform development, code execution, and community/support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Android SDK, .NET

Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

Nov 28, 2020

Decided

I was considering focusing on learning RoR and looking for a work that uses those techs.

After some investigation, I decided to stay with C# .NET:

It is more requested on job positions (7 to 1 in my personal searches average).
It's been around for longer.
it has better documentation and community.
One of Ruby advantages (its amazing community gems, that allows to quickly build parts of your systems by merely putting together third party components) gets quite complicated to use and maintain in huge applications, where building and reusing your own components may become a better approach.
Rail's front end support is starting to waver.
C# .NET code is far easier to understand, debug and maintain. Although certainly not easier to learn from scratch.
Though Rails has an excellent programming speed, C# tends to get the upper hand in long term projects.

I would avise to stick to rails when building small projects, and switching to C# for more long term ones.

Opinions are welcome!

399k views399k

Comments

beinoriusju

Feb 25, 2022

Review

Whatever you do don't go WordPress path. Developers over-there tend to ignore system limitations and hardcode and overengineer their solutions so as to please their clients. If you are a beginner probably you'll get to work on someone else's shitty code and will be asked by your boss to do "yet another impossible thing with Wordpress". And... Probably... You'll do it.

My suggestion is: think in stacks and don't start too low. Starting with HTML, CSS3 and JavaScript is too low. Start on higher levels and with something practical. You'll have time for basics some time later and it would be much easier, because you'll see those technologies are compliment to what you do and not your main objective.

My suggestion for you:

Android Mobile App Development path (complex enough so you won't get bored)
All things web3 crypto, nft, virtual reality, blockchain path (has tons of computing web development tasks)
Cloud computing setup and administration path (good, because you say you're not good at programming)
Artificial intelligence and automation (this is future, people need this)

I've also found it helpful to think of each stack as a surface (find Google Images "radar chart") . Every time you try to learn something new you start in the center, with all technology-points overlapping. You are as low as you can get and you know nothing. Your job is to expand outwards each technology so as to make a stack-surace. The more surface the better. You'll see that some technological-aspects are easier to expand than others and plan your time accordingly.

Have a good start!

107k views107k

Comments

Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Android SDK	.NET
Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.	.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.
-	Multiple languages: You can write .NET apps in C#, F#, or Visual Basic.; Cross Platform: Whether you're working in C#, F#, or Visual Basic, your code will run natively on any compatible OS.; Consistent API & Libraries: To extend functionality, Microsoft and others maintain a healthy package ecosystem built on .NET Standard.; Application models for web, mobile, games and more: You can build many types of apps with .NET. Some are cross-platform, and some target a specific OS or .NET implementation.; Choose your tools: The Visual Studio product family provides a great .NET development experience on Windows, Linux, and macOS. Or if you prefer, there are .NET command line tools and plugins.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 21.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 4.9K
Stacks 27.6K	Stacks 15.3K
Followers 20.7K	Followers 5.9K
Votes 800	Votes 1.9K
Pros & Cons
Pros 289 Android development 156 Necessary for android 128 Android studio 86 Mobile framework 82 Backed by google	Pros 273 Tight integration with visual studio 262 Stable code 191 Great community 184 Reliable and strongly typed server side language. 141 Microsoft Cons 13 C# 12 Too expensive to deploy and maintain 8 Microsoft dependable systems 8 Microsoft itself 5 Hard learning curve
Integrations
Java	C# Microsoft Azure F# Xamarin Visual Basic

What are some alternatives to Android SDK, .NET?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

MEAN

MEAN (Mongo, Express, Angular, Node) is a boilerplate that provides a nice starting point for MongoDB, Node.js, Express, and AngularJS based applications. It is designed to give you a quick and organized way to start developing MEAN based web apps with useful modules like Mongoose and Passport pre-bundled and configured.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

.NET vs Android SDK: What are the differences?

Key Differences between .NET and Android SDK

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between .NET and Android SDK in terms of their key differences.

Language Support: .NET primarily uses C# as the programming language, while the Android SDK uses Java as the primary language. While .NET supports multiple languages, including C#, VB.NET, and F#, Android SDK's main focus is on Java.
Platform Compatibility: .NET is a framework developed by Microsoft and primarily aimed at Windows-based platforms. On the other hand, the Android SDK is specifically designed for developing applications for the Android operating system.
IDE Compatibility: .NET offers a wide range of integrated development environments (IDEs) to choose from, including Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code. Android SDK, on the other hand, is mainly supported by Android Studio, an IDE specifically built for Android app development.
Native vs Cross-Platform Development: While .NET allows for both native and cross-platform development, Android SDK focuses on native development for the Android platform. .NET provides Xamarin, a cross-platform development tool, but it is not as tightly integrated as Android Studio and the Android SDK for native Android app development.
Code Execution: .NET compiles code into Intermediate Language (IL) and then uses the Common Language Runtime (CLR) to execute the code. In contrast, Android SDK and Java compile code into bytecode, which is then executed by the Java Virtual Machine (JVM).
Community and Support: .NET has a strong developer community and is well-supported by Microsoft with regular updates and documentation. The Android SDK also has a large community of developers, but it is mainly supported by Google, which provides frequent updates and comprehensive documentation.

In summary, .NET and Android SDK differ in terms of language support, platform compatibility, IDE compatibility, native vs cross-platform development, code execution, and community/support.