StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. Angular 2 vs Breeze.js

Angular 2 vs Breeze.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Angular
Angular
Stacks3.8K
Followers4.8K
Votes499
GitHub Stars99.2K
Forks26.7K
Breeze.js
Breeze.js
Stacks11
Followers18
Votes0

Angular 2 vs Breeze.js: What are the differences?

<Angular 2 and Breeze.js are both popular technologies used in web development. Here are the key differences between Angular 2 and Breeze.js.>

  1. Architecture: Angular 2 is a front-end framework used for building dynamic web applications, while Breeze.js is a data management library designed to work with client-side JavaScript applications.

  2. Features: Angular 2 provides features such as two-way data binding, dependency injection, and routing, whereas Breeze.js focuses on providing client-side caching, change tracking, and data synchronization with the server.

  3. Use Cases: Angular 2 is commonly used to create single-page applications (SPAs) with complex user interfaces, while Breeze.js is more suitable for applications that require efficient data management and synchronization with a back-end server.

  4. Community Support: Angular 2 has a large and active community that offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party plugins, whereas Breeze.js has a smaller community base with limited resources and support available.

  5. Learning Curve: Angular 2 has a steeper learning curve due to its complex architecture and various concepts, while Breeze.js is relatively easier to learn and implement for developers familiar with JavaScript and data manipulation.

  6. Integration: Angular 2 can be easily integrated with other libraries and frameworks, offering flexibility in application development, whereas Breeze.js is primarily used in conjunction with frameworks like Angular or React for enhanced data management capabilities.

In Summary, Angular 2 is a front-end framework for building dynamic web applications, while Breeze.js is a data management library focused on client-side data management and synchronization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Angular, Breeze.js

Dennis
Dennis

CTO at Prepaid-Hoster

May 17, 2020

Decided

I was first sceptical about using Angular over AngularJS. That's because AngularJS was so easy to integrate in existing websites. But building apps from scratch with Angular is so much easier. Of course, you have to build and boilerplate them first, but after that - you save a ton of time. Also it's very cozy to write code in TypeScript.

181k views181k
Comments
Kyle
Kyle

Web Application Developer at Fortinet

Oct 16, 2019

Decided

When deciding on a front end framework to build my bitcoin faucet project, I knew I needed something battle hardened, dependedable, but also feature filled and ready to go out of the box.

While I've written some smaller apps with ng2+, I've never gone full tilt with it so I knew there were still some things to learn, and most importantly: how to do them properly, such as proper component architecture and breaking old habbits from ng1.

I didn't opt for React in this case, simply due to the need to stack more and more things on top of it to do what I'd need it to do. I wanted a framework that was going to take over routing and execution of complex UI controls, and keep items outside of a component's scope updated and react to events. This framework needed a comprehensive event emission system, data acquisition and handling, bi-directional data binding, state, and a series of things that you'd need to install separately for React to match up to what's already in the box with Angular.

I opted to stick to Angular instead of Vue for the fact that Angular also already has it's entire build system ready to go and comprehensivly built to deliver the tiniest version of it's deliverable. I was hosting this thing in a google cloud instance, so I needed to make sure the app stayed as small as possible, and could automatically trim out the cruft. This is where Angular's built in Tree Shaking took precedence for me.

Vue is more than capable of handling everything I'd need, and it was something I took serious considerion of. For instance, Vue poweres Cointiply, another bitcoin faucet application that's highly reactive and high componentized just like I wanted.

But I'd still need to learn Vue, I'd still need to configure it's build system, and I still wanted to use SCSS and TypeScript.

So Angular it was. ng8 is a great platform for building very complex user interfaces, and has many of the problems you'd inevitably face integrating a user interface to an application already figured out, and complete with a best practice recommendation.

React and Vue, given enough time and energy, are super capable platforms. No one can deny that. Angular's "A-Z Batteries Included" approach to the whole development process is what made it especially enticing this time.

55.4k views55.4k
Comments
Julius
Julius

PHP Engineer

Jan 31, 2020

Decided

It is a complete waste of time and life to learn a different framework to solve the same problem (Both AngularJS and Angular build A+ UI's, but both require a lot of time to learn). It's dumb to spend 200 hours learning AngularJS, then 200 hours learning Angular when you could spend 200 hours learning AngularJS and 200 hours learning how to solve a different problem (like AI/ML, Data Science, AR/VR, Digital Marketing, etc.)

115k views115k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Angular
Angular
Breeze.js
Breeze.js

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

It is a JavaScript library that helps you manage data in rich client applications. If you store data in a database, query and save those data as complex object graphs, and share these graphs across multiple screens of your JavaScript client, Breeze...

Progressive Web Apps; Native; Code Generation; Code Splitting
Write simple and complex queries using a LINQ-like query syntax; Query a remote service with a full OData-compliant URL; Merges query results into cache; Adding new entities and updating others while preserving unsaved changes.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
99.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
26.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.8K
Stacks
11
Followers
4.8K
Followers
18
Votes
499
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 109
    It's a powerful framework
  • 53
    Straight-forward architecture
  • 48
    TypeScript
  • 45
    Great UI and Business Logic separation
  • 40
    Powerful, maintainable, fast
Cons
  • 9
    Overcomplicated
  • 9
    Large overhead in file size and initialization time
  • 2
    CLI not open to other test and linting tools
  • 2
    Ugly code
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
Firebase
Firebase
Sentry
Sentry
Socket.IO
Socket.IO
Java
Java
Node.js
Node.js
JavaScript
JavaScript
MongoDB
MongoDB
ASP.NET
ASP.NET

What are some alternatives to Angular, Breeze.js?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Mithril

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Marionette

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase