StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Animate.css vs Milligram

Animate.css vs Milligram

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Milligram
Milligram
Stacks38
Followers81
Votes50
GitHub Stars10.2K
Forks738
Animate.css
Animate.css
Stacks11.4K
Followers3.1K
Votes0

Animate.css vs Milligram: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown code compares the key differences between Animate.css and Milligram for website development.

1. **Animation effects: Animate.css provides a wide range of pre-designed animation effects that can be easily applied to website elements, making them more dynamic and engaging. In contrast, Milligram focuses more on providing a lightweight and minimalistic CSS framework with a focus on typography and layout, rather than extensive animation effects.**
2. **Customization options: Animate.css offers limited customization options for animation effects, primarily allowing users to specify the duration and delay of the animations. On the other hand, Milligram provides more extensive customization options for typography, layout, and grid system, allowing users to create unique and personalized designs for their websites.**
3. **File size: Animate.css has a larger file size compared to Milligram due to the extensive library of animation effects it offers. This could impact the loading time of the website, especially on devices with slower internet connections. In contrast, Milligram has a smaller file size, making it more lightweight and faster to load.**
4. **Community support: Animate.css has a larger and more active community of users, making it easier to find resources, tutorials, and examples online. This can be helpful for developers looking to use and customize the animation effects in their projects. Milligram, while also having a community of users, may not have as extensive resources available due to its focus on minimalism.**
5. **Compatibility: Animate.css is compatible with a wide range of browsers and devices, ensuring consistency in the rendering of animation effects across different platforms. Milligram also strives for browser compatibility, but its focus on modern browsers may lead to potential issues for users with older browser versions.**
6. **Purpose: Animate.css is primarily used for adding visual effects and animations to websites, making them more interactive and engaging for users. In contrast, Milligram is designed as a CSS framework for building responsive and clean websites with a focus on typography and layout, catering to users looking for a minimalistic design approach without extensive animations.**

In Summary, Animate.css is more focused on providing animated effects for websites with limited customization options, while Milligram prioritizes minimalistic design, customization flexibility, and quick loading times.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Milligram
Milligram
Animate.css
Animate.css

Milligram provides a minimal setup of styles for a fast and clean starting point. Specially designed for better performance and higher productivity with fewer properties to reset resulting in cleaner code.

It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.

-
Cross-browser animations; Usage with Javascript; Setting Delay and Speed
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
738
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
38
Stacks
11.4K
Followers
81
Followers
3.1K
Votes
50
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Minimalist
  • 6
    Weightless
  • 6
    Flexbox
  • 4
    Responsiveness
  • 4
    Grids
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
CSS 3
CSS 3
HTML5
HTML5

What are some alternatives to Milligram, Animate.css ?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Sass

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase