Animate.css vs PostCSS

Overview

PostCSS

Stacks2.4K

Followers547

Votes49

GitHub Stars28.9K

Forks1.6K

Animate.css

Stacks11.4K

Followers3.1K

Votes0

Animate.css vs PostCSS: What are the differences?

Syntax: Animate.css is a library that provides ready-to-use animations with simple CSS classes, allowing easy integration into web projects. On the other hand, PostCSS is a tool that processes CSS with plugins, enabling developers to build custom transformations based on their specific needs.
Customization: Animate.css offers a set of predefined animations that can be applied by adding specific CSS classes, making it user-friendly but limiting customization options. In contrast, PostCSS allows for extensive customization through the use of plugins, giving developers more control over the CSS transformation process.
Browser Support: Animate.css is widely supported by most modern browsers, ensuring compatibility across different platforms without the need for additional configuration. PostCSS, however, may require additional setup and compatibility checks to ensure proper functioning in various browser environments.
Performance: Utilizing Animate.css for animations can sometimes lead to performance issues, especially when multiple complex animations are used simultaneously on a webpage. PostCSS, being a CSS processor, can help optimize stylesheets and improve performance by eliminating unnecessary code and reducing file sizes.
Community and Updates: Animate.css has a large community of users and contributors, frequently updating the library with new animations and bug fixes. PostCSS also benefits from an active community that continuously develops new plugins and updates to enhance the tool's functionality and performance.
Workflow Integration: Animate.css is straightforward to integrate into existing projects by simply linking the library's CSS file, while PostCSS requires setting up build tools like Gulp or Webpack for seamless integration into the development workflow.

In Summary, Animate.css provides easy-to-use preset animations, while PostCSS offers extensive customization and optimization capabilities for CSS processing in web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on PostCSS, Animate.css

Anonymous

CEO at ME!

Jun 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Sass

Stylus

PostCSS

Originally, I was going to start using @{Sass}|tool:1171| with Parcel, but then I learned about @{Stylus}|tool:1172|, which looked interesting because it can get the property values of something directly instead of through variables, and @{PostCSS}|tool:3339|, which looked interesting because you can customize your Pre/Post-processing. Which tool would you recommend?

547k views547k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

PostCSS	Animate.css
PostCSS is a tool for transforming CSS with JS plugins. These plugins can support variables and mixins, transpile future CSS syntax, inline images, and more.	It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.
-	Cross-browser animations; Usage with Javascript; Setting Delay and Speed
Statistics
GitHub Stars 28.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 2.4K	Stacks 11.4K
Followers 547	Followers 3.1K
Votes 49	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 21 The "babel" of CSS 15 Customizable 8 Autoprefixer 2 Variables 1 Mixins	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	CSS 3 HTML5

What are some alternatives to PostCSS, Animate.css ?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Related Comparisons

Animate.css vs PostCSS: What are the differences?

Syntax: Animate.css is a library that provides ready-to-use animations with simple CSS classes, allowing easy integration into web projects. On the other hand, PostCSS is a tool that processes CSS with plugins, enabling developers to build custom transformations based on their specific needs.
Customization: Animate.css offers a set of predefined animations that can be applied by adding specific CSS classes, making it user-friendly but limiting customization options. In contrast, PostCSS allows for extensive customization through the use of plugins, giving developers more control over the CSS transformation process.
Browser Support: Animate.css is widely supported by most modern browsers, ensuring compatibility across different platforms without the need for additional configuration. PostCSS, however, may require additional setup and compatibility checks to ensure proper functioning in various browser environments.
Performance: Utilizing Animate.css for animations can sometimes lead to performance issues, especially when multiple complex animations are used simultaneously on a webpage. PostCSS, being a CSS processor, can help optimize stylesheets and improve performance by eliminating unnecessary code and reducing file sizes.
Community and Updates: Animate.css has a large community of users and contributors, frequently updating the library with new animations and bug fixes. PostCSS also benefits from an active community that continuously develops new plugins and updates to enhance the tool's functionality and performance.
Workflow Integration: Animate.css is straightforward to integrate into existing projects by simply linking the library's CSS file, while PostCSS requires setting up build tools like Gulp or Webpack for seamless integration into the development workflow.

In Summary, Animate.css provides easy-to-use preset animations, while PostCSS offers extensive customization and optimization capabilities for CSS processing in web development projects.

Animate.css vs PostCSS

Overview